Re[2]: [NTG-context] indentnext question

2005-11-15 Thread Giuseppe Bilotta
Tuesday, November 15, 2005 Hans Hagen wrote:

> Giuseppe Bilotta wrote:

>>BTW, could you please consider adding the indentnext=auto
>>option to all places that support indentnext? This is a very
>>simple patch I already offered in the list, see for example
>>http://www.mail-archive.com/ntg-context@ref.ntg.nl/msg01739.html
>>http://www.mail-archive.com/ntg-context@ref.ntg.nl/msg01744.html
>>  
>>
> interesting link ... watch the latex advertisements on the right -)

LOL. I only got generic TeX ads :)

-- 
Giuseppe "Oblomov" Bilotta

___
ntg-context mailing list
ntg-context@ntg.nl
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context


Re[2]: [NTG-context] indentnext question

2005-11-14 Thread Giuseppe Bilotta
Monday, November 14, 2005 Hans Hagen wrote:

> not 'anymore', more 'not as you expected' -)

> this feature is not supported at the specific item group level, only for
> all itemgroups (took me a while to see that one, after entering
> panic-bug mode);

BTW, could you please consider adding the indentnext=auto
option to all places that support indentnext? This is a very
simple patch I already offered in the list, see for example
http://www.mail-archive.com/ntg-context@ref.ntg.nl/msg01739.html
http://www.mail-archive.com/ntg-context@ref.ntg.nl/msg01744.html

Of course it needs to be updated to new code. It's an
important for those of us that (like me) have displayed
material that terminates the paragraph, and displayed
material that doesn't (displayed material = itemgroups,
formulas, quotations etc). In this case, the blank
lines/\pars after the displayed material are significant,
since they tell if the subsequent text is still part of the
previous paragraph or not.

Can you please consider it for inclusion in the main tree?

-- 
Giuseppe "Oblomov" Bilotta

___
ntg-context mailing list
ntg-context@ntg.nl
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context