Re: [NTG-context] packed items not working in latest from 2020.09.03 12:08

2020-09-03 Thread Pablo Rodriguez
On 9/3/20 8:09 PM, Hans Hagen wrote: > On 9/3/2020 4:52 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote: >> [...] >> I’m afraid that packed item lists are misbehaving. >> >> Could anyone confirm this? > can you check again (new lmtx) Many thanks for the new upload, Hans. Now packed

Re: [NTG-context] packed items not working in latest from 2020.09.03 12:08

2020-09-03 Thread Hans Hagen
On 9/3/2020 4:52 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote: Dear list, I have the following sample: \starttext \startitemize[n] \startitem Item\stopitem \startitem Item\stopitem \startitem Item\stopitem \startitem Item\stopitem \stopitemize \startitemize[a, packed

Re: [NTG-context] packed items not working in latest from 2020.09.03 12:08

2020-09-03 Thread Hans Hagen
On 9/3/2020 4:52 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote: Dear list, I have the following sample: \starttext \startitemize[n] \startitem Item\stopitem \startitem Item\stopitem \startitem Item\stopitem \startitem Item\stopitem \stopitemize \startitemize[a, packed

[NTG-context] packed items not working in latest from 2020.09.03 12:08

2020-09-03 Thread Pablo Rodriguez
Dear list, I have the following sample: \starttext \startitemize[n] \startitem Item\stopitem \startitem Item\stopitem \startitem Item\stopitem \startitem Item\stopitem \stopitemize \startitemize[a, packed] \startitem Item\stopitem \startitem Item\stopitem

Re: [NTG-context] something between packed and "small"??

2020-07-01 Thread Wolfgang Schuster
Mike Cooper schrieb am 01.07.2020 um 22:30: -Original Message- From: ntg-context [mailto:ntg-context-boun...@ntg.nl] On Behalf Of Henning Hraban Ramm Sent: Wednesday, July 01, 2020 1:30 PM To: mailing list for ConTeXt users Subject: Re: [NTG-context] something between packed and "

Re: [NTG-context] something between packed and "small"??

2020-07-01 Thread Mike Cooper
> -Original Message- > From: ntg-context [mailto:ntg-context-boun...@ntg.nl] On Behalf Of Henning > Hraban Ramm > Sent: Wednesday, July 01, 2020 1:30 PM > To: mailing list for ConTeXt users > Subject: Re: [NTG-context] something between packed and "small"?? &

Re: [NTG-context] something between packed and "small"??

2020-07-01 Thread Henning Hraban Ramm
inch onto the next page. But > if I use packed, the list is way too crammed together and there’s about 2.5 > inches of extra space on the page! > > How do I go smaller than small? Is there a “lightly packed”? Or other > degrees? > > I’ve tried \blank[1mm] and othe

[NTG-context] something between packed and "small"??

2020-07-01 Thread Mike Cooper
Me again... I've got an itemize that needs to fit on one page. I've been using inbetween={\blank[small]} for all the other analogous lists but this one is longer and with that spacing, it goes about one inch onto the next page. But if I use packed, the list is way too crammed together

Re: [NTG-context] packed list only if items > 5

2019-11-15 Thread Hans Hagen
On 11/14/2019 9:07 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote: Dear list, I have the following sample: \starttext \startitemize[\ifnum\currentnofitems>5 packed\fi] \dorecurse{7} {\startitem\currentitemnumber/\currentnofitems\stopitem} \stopitemize \stoptext Is there any

Re: [NTG-context] packed list only if items > 5

2019-11-14 Thread Tomas Hala
] {\def\startitem##1\stopitem{\incrementcounter[mycounter]}#1} \ifnum \rawcountervalue[mycounter]>\rawcountervalue[minforpacked] \setupitemize[packed]\fi \startitemize#1\stopitemize} \starttext \mystartitemize %normal \dorecurse{2}{\startitem text\stopitem} \stopitem

[NTG-context] packed list only if items > 5

2019-11-14 Thread Pablo Rodriguez
Dear list, I have the following sample: \starttext \startitemize[\ifnum\currentnofitems>5 packed\fi] \dorecurse{7} {\startitem\currentitemnumber/\currentnofitems\stopitem} \stopitemize \stoptext Is there any way to get a packed list if and only if it contains m

[NTG-context] packed slashes and hyphenate after slash in urls

2017-08-12 Thread Pablo Rodriguez
the line with "/," Would it be possible that both options were available: packed slashes and hyphenation after (or before) the slash, both in urls? Many thanks for your help, Pablo -- http://www.ousia.tk _

Re: [NTG-context] packed lists in XML

2015-03-23 Thread Hans Hagen
\xmlregistersetup{xml:initialize} \startxmlsetups xml:ul \startitemize \xmlflush{#1} \stopitemize \stopxmlsetups \startxmlsetups xml:ul:packed \startitemize[packed] \xmlflush{#1} \stopitemize \stopxmlsetups \startxmlsetups

Re: [NTG-context] packed lists in XML

2015-03-23 Thread Pablo Rodriguez
On 03/23/2015 01:01 PM, Hans Hagen wrote: On 3/22/2015 1:39 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote: [...] Standard lists are defined in XML code with ul/li/p and packed lists remove the final /p from the path. How can I associate the each XML list to its right ConTeXt code? \startxmlsetups xml:ul

[NTG-context] packed lists in XML

2015-03-22 Thread Pablo Rodriguez
\xmlflush{#1} \stopitemize \stopxmlsetups \startxmlsetups xml:ul:packed \startitemize[packed] \xmlflush{#1} \stopitemize \stopxmlsetups \startxmlsetups xml:li \startitem \xmlflush{#1} \stopitem

Re: [NTG-context] Problem with setupitemize, columns, and packed?

2014-01-30 Thread Hans Hagen
On 1/30/2014 1:03 AM, Casey Jones wrote: The following MWE doesn't print item two when using the packed option with three columns. \starttext % correct \startitemize[columns, three] \startitem one \stopitem \startitem two \stopitem \startitem three \stopitem \startitem four \stopitem \startitem

[NTG-context] Problem with setupitemize, columns, and packed?

2014-01-29 Thread Casey Jones
The following MWE doesn't print item two when using the packed option with three columns. \starttext % correct \startitemize[columns, three] \startitem one \stopitem \startitem two \stopitem \startitem three \stopitem \startitem four \stopitem \startitem five \stopitem \stopitemize % item two

[NTG-context] packed itemize and beforehead

2010-04-20 Thread Honza Pohanka
Following construction does not work for me. \setupitemize[each][packed][beforehead={}] Is there any possibility to suppress the vertical space around \head in packed itemize? (latest MKII) greetings Jan -- Tato zpráva byla vytvořena převratným poštovním klientem Opery: http

[NTG-context] Problem with packed and \space / broad and /nospace

2009-02-23 Thread Bernd Kosubek
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hallo all! The following lines demonstrates my problem: { \setupspacing[packed] \startalignment[right] . . . . .\space{}

Re: [NTG-context] Problem with packed and \space / broad and /nospace

2009-02-23 Thread Wolfgang Schuster
Am 23.02.2009 um 21:52 schrieb Bernd Kosubek: If I run texexec over this, the last three line are longer than the first line AND they have the same lengths. What have I not understand -- or is it a known problem or a bug? You get what you write. 2. Sentence: \space{} = 2 spaces because of

Re: [NTG-context] Problem with packed and \space / broad and /nospace

2009-02-23 Thread Bernd Kosubek
the first \space produce NO space (that is not what I wish) I suppose, that the empty group has no effect. The following space will be printed and THIS space should be smaller in an broad-environment if I use \nospace or larger in an packed-environment if I use \space. - -- Bernd Kosubek

Re: [NTG-context] Problem with packed and \space / broad and /nospace

2009-02-23 Thread Wolfgang Schuster
now one space from the \space command and another one from the whitespace in the output. I suppose, that the empty group has no effect. The following space will be printed and THIS space should be smaller in an broad-environment if I use \nospace or larger in an packed-environment if I use \space

Re: [NTG-context] Problem with packed and \space / broad and /nospace

2009-02-23 Thread Bernd Kosubek
in an packed-environment if I use \space. You need a empty group to get a space after commands like \TeX because the command gobbles otherwise all following whitespace. Try the following example: text\relax text\space text\space{}\space{}\space{}\space text Wolfgang Thank you I

[NTG-context] \setupitemize[packed,paragraph]

2005-07-07 Thread Mojca Miklavec
Why does \setupitemize[packed,paragraph] ignore the packed option? Another way would probably be to say \setupitemize[packed,joinedup], but I would only like some additional space after the itemization and none before. \setupitemize[joinedup] produces the same result as \setupitemize