Re: [NTG-context] Bug in \placeformula

2016-09-02 Thread Otared Kavian
Hi Henri, Your are right there is an issue with \startmathcases…\stopmathcases: the equations are not numbered when using this structure. As a temporary solution you can use \startmatrix…\stopmatrix as in the following, or you can define your own \startalignedcases. \starttext \placeformula

[NTG-context] Bug in \placeformula

2016-09-02 Thread Henri Menke
Dear list, this formula is not numbered even though it should be. Please fix. \starttext \placeformula \startformula \startmathcases \NC 0 \NC $\mu > 2t$ \NR \NC \pi/2 \NC $\mu = 2t$ \NR \NC \pi \NC $\mu < 2t$ \NR \stopmathcases \stopformula \stoptext Cheers,

Re: [NTG-context] Bug in placeformula with framed text

2016-07-05 Thread Otared Kavian
Hi Hans, Thanks a lot for having fixed the issue I was reporting. Unfortunately I found another issue related to placeformula and alignment in math mode. In the following example the use of \startalign in a \placeformula triggers a weird behavior in the sense that the following instance

Re: [NTG-context] Bug in placeformula with framed text

2016-07-05 Thread Hans Hagen
On 7/4/2016 11:11 AM, Otared Kavian wrote: Below is an example (sorry if it is not absolutely minimal: I ran into this bug when updating a lecture notes which uses a left frame around \proclaim stuff). I attach the PDF showing the problem. I wonder whether this is related to the new features

[NTG-context] Bug in placeformula with framed text

2016-07-04 Thread Otared Kavian
Hi Hans, It seems that there is a bug in the latest beta (ConTeXt vesion: 2016.07.01 16:28) when using \placeformula with a framed text environment. The numbers for the formulas are placed incorrectly, on the left as well as on the right. Also, as one may see in the example below the numbering

Re: [NTG-context] \placeformula

2010-12-01 Thread Hans Hagen
On 30-11-2010 8:10, Wolfgang Schuster wrote: Hi Hans, a fix for strc-mat.mkiv \unexpanded\def\placeformula - {\doglobal\settrue\insideplaceformula + {\global\settrue\insideplaceformula \settrue\incrementformulanumber \dodoubleempty\doplaceformula} \unexpanded\def\placesubformula

[NTG-context] \placeformula

2010-11-30 Thread Wolfgang Schuster
Hi Hans, a fix for strc-mat.mkiv \unexpanded\def\placeformula - {\doglobal\settrue\insideplaceformula + {\global\settrue\insideplaceformula \settrue\incrementformulanumber \dodoubleempty\doplaceformula} \unexpanded\def\placesubformula - {\doglobal\settrue\insideplacesubformula + {\global

[NTG-context] formula: placeformula messes with margins

2010-09-14 Thread Peter Schorsch
Hi, I also ran into a problem with placeformula and margins. The attached example runs fine with the margins. But as soon the placeformula is uncommented the left and right margins are messed up. And if not all paragraphs have at both side a marginnote is get worse. Is there a way to solve

Re: [NTG-context] \placeformula and $$ doesn't work anymore

2006-12-21 Thread Aditya Mahajan
On Sat, 16 Dec 2006, Taco Hoekwater wrote: Hubertus wrote: Hello again, I've been offline for the last week, so I could'nd write. Thanks for your answers! Well my problem is, that I'm just some kind of ordinary user. I've no clue about tex. I've had a look into the conre-mat.tex

Re: [NTG-context] \placeformula and $$ doesn't work anymore

2006-12-16 Thread Taco Hoekwater
Hubertus wrote: Hello again, I've been offline for the last week, so I could'nd write. Thanks for your answers! Well my problem is, that I'm just some kind of ordinary user. I've no clue about tex. I've had a look into the conre-mat.tex and tried to compare it with your posts. But, alas,

Re: [NTG-context] \placeformula and $$ doesn't work anymore

2006-12-15 Thread Hubertus
Hello again, I've been offline for the last week, so I could'nd write. Thanks for your answers! Well my problem is, that I'm just some kind of ordinary user. I've no clue about tex. I've had a look into the conre-mat.tex and tried to compare it with your posts. But, alas, no success. Is this a

Re: [NTG-context] \placeformula and $$ doesn't work anymore

2006-12-05 Thread Aditya Mahajan
On Mon, 4 Dec 2006, Hubertus Schmidt wrote: Hi all, for some weeks I need to tex formulas again and tried the way I used to do it: \placeformula $$ f(t)={1\over2\pi}\int_0^\infty e^{i(\omega t-kx)} dx $$ It didn't work anymore?!? It doesn't place a number nor does it do the spacing

Re: [NTG-context] \placeformula and $$ doesn't work anymore

2006-12-05 Thread Aditya Mahajan
On Tue, 5 Dec 2006, Aditya Mahajan wrote: On Mon, 4 Dec 2006, Hubertus Schmidt wrote: Hi all, for some weeks I need to tex formulas again and tried the way I used to do it: \placeformula $$ f(t)={1\over2\pi}\int_0^\infty e^{i(\omega t-kx)} dx $$ It didn't work anymore

Re: [NTG-context] \placeformula and $$ doesn't work anymore

2006-12-05 Thread Taco Hoekwater
Aditya Mahajan wrote: This is a bug in doplaceformula. I do not know how to avoid it, but the next code illustrates what is happening. \def\dotest{ \def\nextnext{$}% \ifx\next\nextnext Inside dispplaceformula\ldots % This always fails \else Inside