[NTG-context] Integrating Metapost

2003-10-30 Thread Lutz Haseloff
Hallo all, Running texexec on a ConTeXt-file with integrated METAPOST-Graphics METAPOST complains about: --- local_multi_par_area false ! Equation cannot be performed (numeric=boolean). ; l.218 local_multi_par_area:=false; ? ---

Re: [NTG-context] Integrating Metapost

2003-10-30 Thread Nigel King
> l.218 local_multi_par_area:=false; Presuming that the line is in your file as written I think you need a line earlier which says boolean local_multi_par_area; -- Nigel ___ ntg-context mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/

[NTG-context] Kerning pairs for Optima-Italic

2003-10-30 Thread Steffen Wolfrum
Hi, after I converted MacOSX's Optima.dfont for usage with TeX I experienced that this Adobe Optima (Regular, Italic, Bold, BoldItalic, ExtraBold) doesn't have extra kerning pairs. (And I don't have any idea how to create these on my own.) So I had a look at WalterSchmidt's page (home.vr-web.d

[NTG-context] Re: Integrating Metapost

2003-10-30 Thread Patrick Gundlach
Lutz Haseloff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > What can the error be? anything. Perhaps an out of sync ConTeXt and metafun version. Please regenerate metafun and ConTeXt formats, make a simple test file, run it, double check that the versions are OK and if the error persist, please post a minimal (b

[NTG-context] Re: another itemize question

2003-10-30 Thread Patrick Gundlach
Hi, >> > TeXshow, but unfortunately the \setupitemize command is not listed >> > there. - In the english manual I could find the use of this command, >> >> it is listed as \setupitemgroup > > are they synonyms? why two names? For those, who still wonder: \setupitemize is a command generated by

Re: [NTG-context] Integrating Metapost

2003-10-30 Thread Hans Hagen
At 08:44 30/10/2003, you wrote: Hallo all, Running texexec on a ConTeXt-file with integrated METAPOST-Graphics METAPOST complains about: --- local_multi_par_area false ! Equation cannot be performed (numeric=boolean). looks like an old version of metafun with a ne

Re: [NTG-context] Integrating Metapost

2003-10-30 Thread Andres Loeh
> > local_multi_par_area > > false > > > >! Equation cannot be performed (numeric=boolean). > > looks like an old version of metafun with a new version of context; make > sure that the metafun macros are in metapost/context/base (and not in one > of the parent directories) and regenerat

Re: [NTG-context] Re: another itemize question

2003-10-30 Thread Gary Pajer
> >> it is listed as \setupitemgroup > > > > are they synonyms? why two names? > > For those, who still wonder: \setupitemize is a command generated by > \defineitemgroup. > > \defineitemgroup [\v!itemize] [\c!niveaus=6] > > in core-itm.tex Good idea to clear that up. Now back to our regularly s