[NTG-context] beta / pdftex

2003-11-27 Thread Hans Hagen
The latest version assumes the most recent pdftex, i'll fix this; if you run into troubles, add this to cont-new.tex: \ifx\pdfoptionpdfinclusionerrorlevel\undefined \newcount\pdfoptionpdfinclusionerrorlevel \fi \pdfoptionpdfinclusionerrorlevel=0 \ifx\pdfoptionpdfminorversion\undefined

Re: [NTG-context] news / bold math

2003-11-27 Thread Mikael Persson
News: http://www.pragma-ade.com/general/magazines/mag-0005.pdf bold math and mixed bold math; only defined for lucida (dunno other bold math fonts yet) I also uploaded new versions. Hans Hi everyone, this looks fine. I have used Wolfram's Mathematica fonts for a while, and they

Re: [NTG-context] news / bold math

2003-11-27 Thread Mikael Persson
At 20:47 27/11/2003, you wrote: this looks fine. I have used Wolfram's Mathematica fonts for a while, and they have, among others, bold math. I give a link to two pdfs with some examples. One can download the fonts from Wolframs site. can you give a pointer to those fonts? Hans Yes, I

Re: [NTG-context] `Standard' vs `Beta'?

2003-11-27 Thread Bob Kerstetter
Thanks, Hans. On Nov 27, 2003, at 3:26 AM, Hans Hagen wrote: At 03:14 27/11/2003, you wrote: what is the difference between the distributed and the beta versions of context? How current is my version? Does it have all of the cool stuff for doing column sets? in most cases recent versions of