Re: [NTG-context] Re: wrong patch

At 23:33 01/06/2004, you wrote: * Hans Hagen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [Jun 01, 2004 21:30]: > if ($ENV["TEMP"] && -e $ENV["TEMP"]) { > $RunPath = $ENV["TEMP"] ; > } elsif ($ENV["TMP"] && -e $ENV["TMP"]) { > $RunPath = $ENV["TMP"] ; > } Just checking, aren't the []'s supposed

Re: [NTG-context] %%BoundingBox: (atend)

On Tue, 1 Jun 2004, Hans Hagen wrote: At 14:24 30/05/2004, you wrote: Hello, ConTeXt does not find the EPS-BoundingBox in EPS files generated by xmgrace. Such a file begins like this: %!PS-Adobe-3.0 EPSF-3.0 %%BoundingBox: (atend) [...] If not, I'm going to write a script, that converts the file.

Re: [NTG-context] %%BoundingBox: (atend)

Hi, A one-line patch to texutil.pl is enough to handle most cases of (atend). The method is far from waterproof, but neither is a Korn Shell script, and the added complexity to texutil.pl is neglible. Greetings, Taco --- texutil.pl.org 2004-06-02 15:36:03.610266871 +0200 +++ texutil.pl 2

Re: [NTG-context] wrong patch

Am Mittwoch, 02.06.04, um 10:09 Uhr (Europe/Zurich) schrieb Hans Hagen: > if ($ENV["TEMP"] && -e $ENV["TEMP"]) { > $RunPath = $ENV["TEMP"] ; > } elsif ($ENV["TMP"] && -e $ENV["TMP"]) { > $RunPath = $ENV["TMP"] ; > } interestingly perl does not complain, which is one more

Re: [NTG-context] %%BoundingBox: (atend)

On Wed, 2 Jun 2004, Taco Hoekwater wrote: > + { if ($SomeLine =~ /^%%BoundingBox:(?!\s+\(atend\))/io) Yes, this seems to be good. But how is texutil used in this situation? I've tried "texexec test" and "texexec --texutil test", but texutil is never called. test.tex is a file wi

Re: [NTG-context] Re: pdfTeX questions

On Tue, 1 Jun 2004, Hans Hagen wrote: > At 14:53 31/05/2004, Patrick Gundlach wrote > > >a quick test shows that > >/Author (M,nster) is put in the pdf file, where the Character after > >the M is 0xfc. Dunno if this is right. > > dunno either but it is supposed to be in the proper encoding (unic

Re: [NTG-context] SciTE Mac

Am Dienstag, 01.06.04, um 13:13 Uhr (Europe/Zurich) schrieb Adam Lindsay: The dependency diagram (with the two main tricks I could remember) are up at: Thank you - I thought one must fix SciTE, not GTK. Did you try SciTE installation via Fin

Re: [NTG-context] \=i

Hans Hagen said this at Tue, 1 Jun 2004 21:04:49 +0200: > >take a look at font-ini and search for the definition of \em; but since you >suffered already a lot: Hey Hans, I like this one a lot. It's more of what I imaged when you mentioned "fonts" and "parameters". (But I managed something intere

Re: [NTG-context] SciTE Mac

Henning Hraban Ramm said this at Wed, 2 Jun 2004 20:25:39 +0200: >Thank you - I thought one must fix SciTE, not GTK. SciTE is pretty straightforward, once you have everything else in place. I did have to explicitly 'make GTK2=true' though. >Did you try SciTE installation via Fink (unstable tree)

Re: [NTG-context] SciTE Mac

Am Mittwoch, 02.06.04, um 21:55 Uhr (Europe/Zurich) schrieb Adam Lindsay: Did you try SciTE installation via Fink (unstable tree)? Works perfectly! (But needed a whole night to compile everything...) Does it? I've always been a bit dubious about Fink (I've used it in 10.0 and 10.1), and I think i