And I don't have a solution, but another bug in registers: if you
modify my example like so:
\starttext
This \index{This} and \index{And} that \index{That}.
\placeindex
\stoptext
you'll see one interesting detail in the pdf: This and That are in
the index under h, And under n == capital
Idris Samawi Hamid wrote:
But you should also explore DocBook-in-ConTeXt, which
uses ConTeXt's native XML processing capabilities.
Is it possible to create a Word template that is isomorphic with a DocBook
format?
You can write a Word template isomorphic to a (pretty large) subset of
Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:
And I don't have a solution, but another bug in registers: if you
modify my example like so:
\starttext
This \index{This} and \index{And} that \index{That}.
\placeindex
\stoptext
you'll see one interesting detail in the pdf: This and That are in
the index under
Idris Samawi Hamid wrote:
Ok, you guys have lost me now-) Maybe the best thing to do is try something
Just ignore the detail of what xslt can and can't do for the moment.
That just influences the choice of tools for one particular step and we
all agree that there are tools for this step.
it
OK, I have to modify my last mail: the bizarre sorting bug only
occurs when I use newtexexec. The bug with /seeindex occurs both in
newtexexec and old texexec. Thanks luigi, for looking at this!
Thomas
On Sep 28, 2005, at 9:40 AM, luigi.scarso wrote:
hmm, not for me.
This and That are
No need for rtf. That would loose lots of information anyway, wouldn't it?
RTF can capture everything that .doc can (MS update it every time they
rev the .doc format), and it has the advantage that it is defined in a
spec with a grammar, which means that importing routines (like the one
in
Hans Hagen wrote:
Christopher Creutzig wrote:
Is there a way of having \installprogram for only for after the *last*
run? (I don't think there could be a systemmode for the last run, but
another option is to use --final in texexec and test for:
\startmode[*last]
... \stopmode
Duncan Hothersall wrote:
RTF can capture everything that .doc can (MS update it every time they
rev the .doc format), and it has the advantage that it is defined in a
spec with a grammar, which means that importing routines (like the one
Oh, yes, the RTF spec. It really makes you wonder
Michal Kvasnička wrote:
Good evening.
After some time I tried to install the newest ConTeXt over my old teTeX
in SuSE Linux 9.2. Everything seems to work. I use texexec version 5.4.3
with ConTeXt version 2005.08.31. ConTeXt gives this warning:
systems : pdfTeX version 110 -
Many thanks. I tried it, but make-process failed. It is a long time
since I last compiled something, so I'm completely lost. Isn't the
binary package for SuSE 9.2 somewhere on the net? My attempts to find it
out failed. :-( It looks I will have to upgrade my system. :-(((
This page might
On 9/28/05, Michal Kvasnička [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Many thanks. I tried it, but make-process failed. It is a long time
since I last compiled something, so I'm completely lost. Isn't the
binary package for SuSE 9.2 somewhere on the net? My attempts to find it
out failed. :-( It looks I will
Is there a general way to double-space the text of footnotes using
\setupfootnotes or some other ConTeXt command? I have checked the
manuals, core-not.text, and the wiki but have not seen one yet.
\baselineskip=2/bodyfontsize works well with the body text, but does
not affect the
Solved the problem for now by using
\setupinterlinespace[line=2\bodyfontsize]
As most often, the ConTeXt way is better!
Sorry for the bother.
Alan
On Sep 28, 2005, at 12:16 PM, Alan Bowen wrote:
Is there a general way to double-space the text of footnotes using
\setupfootnotes or some
Taco,
just so you don't think nobody is interested in your new beta: I
dlded it today and played with it, but had to revert to the old
version because it somehow did not honor the modifications I made to
\setuppublicationlayout (I was getting some default instead of my own
version, and
On Wed, 28 Sep 2005 22:46:32 +0200, Thomas A.Schmitz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Taco,
just so you don't think nobody is interested in your new beta:
The bib module is crucial for me as well. I've been using an ancient
version (the stand-alone version) but I'll be trying out the new one soon,
15 matches
Mail list logo
