Hi,
I think it is not appropriate to have a smaller left than right margin
at a cover page. But my tries to achieve this are not successful.
My relevant expressions:
\setuplayout[header=0mm,location=middle]
\definelayer[bild][x=0mm, y=0mm, width=\paperwidth,
height=\paperheight]
Idris Samawi Hamid wrote:
On Mon, 21 May 2007 04:43:07 -0600, Taco Hoekwater [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Idris Samawi Hamid wrote:
Dear syndicate,
This is an ugly bug; The right kerning of the the numeral '1' is really
bad:
The latin-modern-os typescript uses the widths of the table
2007/5/22, Gerhard Kugler [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
I think it is not appropriate to have a smaller left than right margin
at a cover page. But my tries to achieve this are not successful.
My relevant expressions:
\setuplayout[header=0mm,location=middle]
\definelayer[bild][x=0mm, y=0mm,
Hi Gerhard,
I do not know whtherr I understand your problem correctly. However,
if you want total control of the typesetting area on your paper one
should use more options in the settuplayout command. Think about
topspace, backspace, margins, margindistance, which all do have a
predefined
Hi Taco,
On Tue, 22 May 2007 01:39:55 -0600, Taco Hoekwater [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
This is an ugly bug; The right kerning of the the numeral '1' is
really
bad:
The latin-modern-os typescript uses the widths of the table figures
with the oldstyle shapes, because latin modern does not
On Sun, 20 May 2007 15:45:33 -0600, Hans Hagen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
=
pdfTeX warning: pdftex.exe (file
c:/ConTeXt/tex/texmf/fonts/type1/public/lm/lmt
t10.pfb): glyph `eight.oldstyle' undefined
=
maybe lmtt has no oldstyle
No, the maintainers changed the
Hi Jacko,
On the ConTeXT mailing list, Idris posted some messages because he was
trying to use oldstyle numerals in the latest Latin Modern release,
and was experiencing two pretty big problems:
* really bad kerning around the oldstyle numerals
* pdftex generated errors for the typewriter