Re: [NTG-context] MetaPost 1.004 announcement

2008-05-04 Thread luigi scarso
On Sun, May 4, 2008 at 7:46 AM, Peter Münster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, May 03 2008, luigi scarso wrote: 1. for my linux box, I just grabbed the linux tarball, but the binaries in there still declare they're version 1.003. Is that an oversight, or are those indeed old binaries (and

Re: [NTG-context] MetaPost 1.004 announcement

2008-05-04 Thread Mojca Miklavec
On Sun, May 4, 2008 at 10:38 AM, Taco Hoekwater wrote: Thomas A. Schmitz wrote: 1. general architecture specification: CFLAGS -arch ppc (for powerpc) CFLAGS -arch ppc64(for the new 64bit binaries on powerpc) CFLAGS -arch i386 (for intel) I did not check the ppc64 (not

Re: [NTG-context] MetaPost 1.004 announcement

2008-05-04 Thread Taco Hoekwater
Thomas A. Schmitz wrote: I have two questions/problems with the new release: 1. for my linux box, I just grabbed the linux tarball, but the binaries in there still declare they're version 1.003. Is that an oversight, or are those indeed old binaries (and you forgot to pack the new

Re: [NTG-context] reference manual for cont-en.lua

2008-05-04 Thread Peter Münster
On Tue, Apr 29 2008, luigi scarso wrote: On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 8:25 AM, Peter Münster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is there a reference manual for the functions in cont-en.lua? Are you talking about l-table.lua ? No, about cont-en.lua. But l-table.lua is integrated in that file. It's a merge

[NTG-context] some bugs in tracker can be closed

2008-05-04 Thread Peter Münster
Hello, Perhaps these bugs can be closed now: 53, 56, 60, 61, 65, 82 and 84 Cheers, Peter -- http://pmrb.free.fr/contact/ ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

Re: [NTG-context] MetaPost 1.004 announcement

2008-05-04 Thread Thomas A. Schmitz
On May 4, 2008, at 10:38 AM, Taco Hoekwater wrote: Thomas A. Schmitz wrote: I have two questions/problems with the new release: 1. for my linux box, I just grabbed the linux tarball, but the binaries in there still declare they're version 1.003. Is that an oversight, or are those indeed

Re: [NTG-context] reference manual for cont-en.lua

2008-05-04 Thread luigi scarso
On Sun, May 4, 2008 at 5:14 PM, Peter Münster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, Apr 29 2008, luigi scarso wrote: On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 8:25 AM, Peter Münster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is there a reference manual for the functions in cont-en.lua? Are you talking about l-table.lua ? No,

Re: [NTG-context] reference manual for cont-en.lua

2008-05-04 Thread Peter Münster
On Sun, May 04 2008, luigi scarso wrote: Search on http://source.contextgarden.net for cont-en.lua gives only luat-tmp.lua mtxrun.lua luatools.lua Also my last distro 2008-04-18 has not this file. Maybe a svn trunk ? No, it's a generated file (merge of several lua-files). It should

Re: [NTG-context] reference manual for cont-en.lua

2008-05-04 Thread luigi scarso
No, it's a generated file (merge of several lua-files). It should be on your hard drive at the same place as the format file cont-en.fmt. Ah yes, now I see it; it's in the cache dir -- luigi it's new . it's powerful . it's luatex . http://www.luatex.org