Hi,
In reply to Hans, I am using the latest beta (ConTeXt version 2010.02.25
19:46.
mkiv, LuaTeX version 50, LuaTeX revision 0, (LuaTeX date stamp 2009122521))
As Hans requested a small test file,
\setupnumbering[way=bysection] % --- this used to work, but does not
Hi,
in MkII I set \setupcolors[state=start] to activate defined colors (for text,
numbers etc.),
and \setupcolors[state=stop] to set these colors to black.
Now, in MkIV \setupcolors[state=stop] does set these colors to gray. Not to
black.
[Log: color : system gray is global
Hi Steffen,
Am 01.03.2010 13:41, schrieb Steffen Wolfrum:
Hi,
in MkII I set \setupcolors[state=start] to activate defined colors (for text,
numbers etc.),
and \setupcolors[state=stop] to set these colors to black.
Now, in MkIV \setupcolors[state=stop] does set these colors to gray. Not
Am 01.03.10 09:39, schrieb gummybears:
Hi,
In reply to Hans, I am using the latest beta (ConTeXt version
2010.02.25 19:46.
mkiv, LuaTeX version 50, LuaTeX revision 0, (LuaTeX date stamp
2009122521))
As Hans requested a small test file,
\setupnumbering[way=bysection] % --- this used to
Hi again,
Another METAPOST problem. For the sake of curiosity, I've been looking at
and playing with the superellipse() function in plain METAPOST. This is all
fine and dandy until I try values of 'superness' less than 0.5, in which
case it generates shapes that are seemingly not
On 1-3-2010 15:02, Peter Rolf wrote:
Hi Steffen,
Am 01.03.2010 13:41, schrieb Steffen Wolfrum:
Hi,
in MkII I set \setupcolors[state=start] to activate defined colors (for text,
numbers etc.),
and \setupcolors[state=stop] to set these colors to black.
Now, in MkIV \setupcolors[state=stop]
I should say that the vertices of the superellipse are calculated
correctly. The problem, it seems, is that for the vertices at right, top,
left, and bottom, the angles of entry and exit need to be explicitly
defined, rather than just relying on the '...' which coincidentally works
for s=0.5.
I
James's explanation appears to be right.
On p 126 of the METAFONTbook Knuth says that the superness should be
between 0.5 (when you get a diamond) and 1.0 (when you get a square).
Exercise 14.6 asks the reader to Try superellimpse with superness
values less than 0.5 or greater than 1.0; explain
Hi, I got some time today and checked some symbols of hlcra.tfm
(LucidaNewMath-Arrows), and got this table:
fonts.enc.math[lucida-ma] = {
[0x025CB] = 0x00, -- circle
[0x025CF] = 0x01, -- blackcircle
[0x025A1] = 0x02, -- square
Correction:
[0x021D5] = 0x65, -- Downrightarrow
It's wrong, should be:
[0x021D8] = 0x65, -- Downrightarrow
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 12:26 AM, Zhichu Chen zhichu.c...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, I got some time today and checked some symbols of hlcra.tfm
(LucidaNewMath-Arrows), and got this table:
At Wolfgang
Tried
\definestructureprefixset[section][section-3][]
\setupformulas[numbercolor=blue,numberstyle=bold,prefixset=section]
alas it doesn't work.
What version of Context are you using ?
Thanks
___
If your
Hello,
I checked out context minimals and ran context on your sample file(OS
X Leopard), it worked. The formula is numbered 1.1.
context jh.tex
MTXrun | run 1: luatex
--fmt=/Users/yanger/mystuff/context/tex/texmf-cache/luatex-cache/context/6260f85025788ae8cf4a5735589294e1/formats/cont-en
Am 01.03.10 18:17, schrieb gummybears:
At Wolfgang
Tried
\definestructureprefixset[section][section-3][]
\setupformulas[numbercolor=blue,numberstyle=bold,prefixset=section]
alas it doesn't work.
What version of Context are you using ?
MTXrun | current version: 2010.02.26 10:57
Wolfgang
At saptarshi
With MK-II the formula numbers came out (1.1.1), (1.1.2), numbered by
section.
Chapter 1, section 1, formula 1 - (1.1.1)
Chapter 1, section 1, formula 2 - (1.1.2)
The above is what I want.
Now in MK-IV they come out numbered like
Chapter 1, section 1, formula 1 - (1.1)
Chapter 1,
Am 01.03.10 18:32, schrieb gummybears:
At saptarshi
With MK-II the formula numbers came out (1.1.1), (1.1.2), numbered by
section.
Chapter 1, section 1, formula 1 - (1.1.1)
Chapter 1, section 1, formula 2 - (1.1.2)
The above is what I want.
Now in MK-IV they come out numbered like
Chapter
Thanks Wolfgang, this worked for me.
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 12:47 PM, Wolfgang Schuster
schuster.wolfg...@googlemail.com wrote:
Am 01.03.10 18:32, schrieb gummybears:
At saptarshi
With MK-II the formula numbers came out (1.1.1), (1.1.2), numbered by
section.
Chapter 1, section 1, formula
I've come up with a crude function that's doing more like what I want. I
have two problems with it:
1. The most important: I need to differentiate the equations that generate a
superellipse, in order to find the tangent at the defined vertices. I have
failed to do this and so use a crude
Wolfgang, works for me too. Thanks for your time.
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
For 2: I think Metafont makes more sense if you don't think of a macro
as a function that does some work in its own context and returns a
value, but as something that expands textually in place. So there
isn't any concept of return as there aren't separate stack frames to
return from or to.
So
Hi,
in MKIV, the long dash (--) seems to be broken.
Example:
\starttext
some -- text
\stoptext
Outputs with literal -- instead of a longer - as it used to do before.
It still worked ~2 weeks ago. I tested it with the minimals (beta) under
Linux and Windows.
Best Regards,
Andreas Schneider.
To all interested
I found a simpler solution, not knowing how prefixsegments really work, but
mainly understand
from this example, is
\setupformulas[prefixsegments=chapter:section]
instead of using
\setupformulas[prefixsegments=1:100]
Both setups gives the same numbering scheme of the formula
Am 01.03.10 22:40, schrieb gummybears:
To all interested
I found a simpler solution, not knowing how prefixsegments really
work, but mainly understand
from this example, is
\setupformulas[prefixsegments=chapter:section]
instead of using
\setupformulas[prefixsegments=1:100]
interesting
On 1-3-2010 22:40, gummybears wrote:
To all interested
I found a simpler solution, not knowing how prefixsegments really work, but
mainly understand
from this example, is
\setupformulas[prefixsegments=chapter:section]
instead of using
\setupformulas[prefixsegments=1:100]
Both setups gives
With the help of Wolfgang (thanks) the solution is (tested)
\setupformulas[prefix=yes,prefixsegments=chapter:section,way=bysection]
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 10:40 PM, gummybears oracle...@gmail.com wrote:
To all interested
I found a simpler solution, not knowing how prefixsegments really
Thank you Aditya and Wolfgang,
I will try it both:
No page breaks possible:
\defineframedtext[tablebox][frame=off,width=\hsize,offset=0pt,before
=,after=]
\starttext
vorher
\startnarrower
text
\starttablebox
\starttable[s0|l|]
\NC table entry \NC\AR
\stoptable
On 1-3-2010 20:43, Andreas Schneider wrote:
Hi,
in MKIV, the long dash (--) seems to be broken.
Example:
\starttext
some -- text
\stoptext
Outputs with literal -- instead of a longer - as it used to do before.
It still worked ~2 weeks ago. I tested it with the minimals (beta) under
Linux and
Hans Hagen wrote:
fixed in next beta ...
Awesome, fast as usual :-)
Thanks a lot!
Andreas.
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl /
2010/2/28 Vedran Miletić wrote:
2010/2/26 Mojca Miklavec wrote:
I suspect (though I don't really know) that the difference comes from
different versions of TeX Gyre. There's a quick experiment you can do:
rsync -av \
/usr/local/texlive/2009/texmf-dist/fonts/tfm/public/tex-gyre/ \
28 matches
Mail list logo
