Re: [NTG-context] Absolute position in table cell

On 02/16/2016 10:49 PM, Hans Hagen wrote: > On 2/16/2016 10:29 PM, Volker Mische wrote: >> On 02/16/2016 05:40 PM, Wolfgang Schuster wrote: Volker Mische 16. Februar 2016 um 17:21 Thanks a lot that works. I've a follow up question. I'd

Re: [NTG-context] Deprecated $…$ for inline math?

On 2/17/2016 8:31 AM, Otared Kavian wrote: I agree totally with Alan in saying that the inline math signals $\cdots$ should NEVER be left out from ConTeXt, or even become deprecated. that was never the intention (as one can always run in asciimode) but what's being discussed here is more

[NTG-context] new error in Context-Metapost

Some code that worked ok but hasn't been used for some time, now gives an error: missing $. It is working fine in ConTeXt, but putting it inside an MPpage goes wrong. Here a minimal example, the output of the ConTeXt run and the error on the MPpage run. Has something changed I missed? Hans van

[NTG-context] Buffer with syntax highlighting

Hello, is it possible to \typebuffer with a syntax highlighting? \typefile allows to specific syntax highlighter, e.g. \typefile[TEX]{file.tex}; \typebuffer does not (AFAIK). It would be useful to have: \startbuffer[demo] \startitemize \item Hello! \stopitemize \stopbuffer which

Re: [NTG-context] new error in Context-Metapost

On 2/17/2016 11:27 AM, Meer, Hans van der wrote: Some code that worked ok but hasn't been used for some time, now gives an error: missing $. It is working fine in ConTeXt, but putting it inside an MPpage goes wrong. That was a tricky one to nail down ... it related to the fact that have \{

Re: [NTG-context] Buffer with syntax highlighting

On 2/17/2016 1:16 PM, Procházka Lukáš Ing. wrote: Hello, is it possible to \typebuffer with a syntax highlighting? \typefile allows to specific syntax highlighter, e.g. \typefile[TEX]{file.tex}; \typebuffer does not (AFAIK). It would be useful to have: \startbuffer[demo] \startitemize

Re: [NTG-context] Buffer with syntax highlighting

On Wed, 17 Feb 2016 13:16:03 +0100 Procházka Lukáš Ing. wrote: > is it possible to \typebuffer with a syntax highlighting? \typebuffer [demo] [option=context] Also have a look at Aditya's vim syntax highlighter module which is great. Marco

Re: [NTG-context] new error in Context-Metapost

Thanks for the quick answer. This error looks tricky indeed. I haven't the faintest illusion I could have found out by myself... Hans van der Meer On 17 Feb 2016, at 13:34, Hans Hagen > wrote: That was a tricky one to nail down ... it related to the fact

[NTG-context] Titles numbering

The following file used to give me numbered titles (and still gives numbered titles in TeXLive): \setuphead[part][ placehead=yes, page=yes, % number=yes ] \setuphead[chapter][ page=yes, % number=yes ] \starttext \startpart[title={Part one}] \startchapter[title={Fancy chapter

Re: [NTG-context] Titles numbering

Michał Goliński 17. Februar 2016 um 14:32 The following file used to give me numbered titles (and still gives numbered titles in TeXLive): \setuphead[part][ placehead=yes, page=yes, % number=yes ] \setuphead[chapter][ page=yes, % number=yes ] \starttext

Re: [NTG-context] Buffer with syntax highlighting

That's it, thank you! Lukas On Wed, 17 Feb 2016 13:39:47 +0100, Marco Patzer wrote: On Wed, 17 Feb 2016 13:16:03 +0100 Procházka Lukáš Ing. wrote: is it possible to \typebuffer with a syntax highlighting? \typebuffer [demo] [option=context] Also

Re: [NTG-context] two issues with xtables

On 02/16/2016 09:07 PM, Wolfgang Schuster wrote: >> Pablo Rodriguez 16. Februar 2016 um 20:59 >> [...] >> MetaPost is unknown to me. How would it be with this minimal sample? > > There is a second method which let you create your own argument for the > leftframe, > rightframe etc. keys. Many

Re: [NTG-context] two issues with xtables

On Wed, 17 Feb 2016, Pablo Rodriguez wrote: On 02/16/2016 09:07 PM, Wolfgang Schuster wrote: Pablo Rodriguez 16. Februar 2016 um 20:59 [...] MetaPost is unknown to me. How would it be with this minimal sample? There is a second method which let you create your own argument for the leftframe,

Re: [NTG-context] two issues with xtables

On 02/17/2016 03:08 PM, Aditya Mahajan wrote: > On Wed, 17 Feb 2016, Pablo Rodriguez wrote: >> [..] >> I’m afraid that only leftframe seems to work with latest beta: >> >>\installleftframerenderer{big}{\blackrule[height=\overlayheight, >>width=3\linewidth]} > > You need to add

Re: [NTG-context] two issues with xtables

On 02/17/2016 03:22 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote: > [...] > I wonder whether a common \installframerenderer would make sense here. > It would simplify code writing. Or at least I think it may be useful. Excuse my nonsense. I have just realized that lines must be different for top/bottom and

[NTG-context] applying properties to columns / rows in xtables

Dear list, having this basic xtable (adapted from xtables-mkiv.pdf): \starttext \startxtable[option=stretch] \startxrow \startxcell one \stopxcell \startxcell two \stopxcell \stopxrow \startxrow \startxcell alpha \stopxcell

Re: [NTG-context] applying properties to columns / rows in xtables

Pablo Rodriguez 17. Februar 2016 um 15:48 Dear list, having this basic xtable (adapted from xtables-mkiv.pdf): \starttext \startxtable[option=stretch] \startxrow \startxcell one \stopxcell \startxcell two \stopxcell \stopxrow \startxrow \startxcell alpha \stopxcell

Re: [NTG-context] applying properties to columns / rows in xtables

On 02/17/2016 04:01 PM, Wolfgang Schuster wrote: >> Pablo Rodriguez 17. Februar 2016 um 15:48 >> In this sample, it would be easy. In a longer xtable, I would like to >> avoid it :-). > > What do you want to do? Sorry, Wolfgang. You’re right, I forgot to tell- I want to avoid tagging each cell

Re: [NTG-context] applying properties to columns / rows in xtables

Pablo Rodriguez 17. Februar 2016 um 16:12 Sorry, Wolfgang. You’re right, I forgot to tell- I want to avoid tagging each cell to get this: \starttext \startxtable[option=stretch] \startxrow \startxcell[align=left] one \stopxcell \startxcell[align=center] two \stopxcell

Re: [NTG-context] applying properties to columns / rows in xtables

On 02/17/2016 04:22 PM, Wolfgang Schuster wrote: > [...] > \setupxtable[align=\ifcase\currentxtablecolumn\or flushright\else middle\fi] Many thanks for your fast reply, Wolfgang. This is exactly what I need. I wouldn’t have found out myself in centuries. Many thanks for your help, Pablo --

Re: [NTG-context] Deprecated $…$ for inline math?

On Wed, 17 Feb 2016 10:44:43 +0100 Hans Hagen wrote: > also, but don't tell alan, there is this: > > \m[i:tight]{} > > i:default, i:tight, i:half, i:fixed I spy... I would suggest that one would set (inline) math spacing and other options (like \mathscriptsmode) globally

Re: [NTG-context] Deprecated $…$ for inline math?

On Wed, 17 Feb 2016, Alan BRASLAU wrote: However, I can see situations where one might want to tighten spacing in order to fit a particular expression within a line or in a table, for example. Here, \math[options]{expression} is a reasonable syntax, yet I cannot foresee ever using the very

Re: [NTG-context] Deprecated $…$ for inline math?

I use $…$. And for copying text from one TeX to another (e.g. ConTeXt <—> PlainTex/Latex/Markdown/Jax), it would be a pain if I couldn't. Michael > On Feb 17, 2016, at 1:24 PM, Aditya Mahajan wrote: > > On Wed, 17 Feb 2016, Alan BRASLAU wrote: > >> However, I can see

Re: [NTG-context] Deprecated $…$ for inline math?

On Wed, 17 Feb 2016 13:24:53 -0500 Aditya Mahajan wrote: > I am curious to know if there is ANYONE who types in a lot of math > and regularly uses \m{...} or \math{...}. I still use $$ and use > \math{..} or \mathematics{...} only when generating output from lua > code:

Re: [NTG-context] Deprecated $…$ for inline math?

On 02/17/2016 11:18 PM, Alan BRASLAU wrote: > On Wed, 17 Feb 2016 20:08:31 +0100 Hans Hagen wrote: > >> you're an american citizen who likes $x^2$ but to call if >> beautiful ... €x^2€ nor £x^2£ (in 8 bit encodings / local keyboards >> times) all look bad ... > > Hans, you forgot: ¥x^2¥, ₽x^2₽,

Re: [NTG-context] Deprecated $…$ for inline math?

On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 00:40:39 +0100 Pablo Rodriguez wrote: > Excuse me, Alan, this is exclamation in Spanish (and only in Spanish). Bigre ! Of course, I know that. > Just out of curiosity, why do you think he should have chosen that? I was attempting to make some fun with this