Hi, I have asked this question on tex.stackexchange.com
http://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/113592/formulas-in-context-are-different-from-those-in-plain-tex/113609?noredirect=1#comment250549_113609
as the title said, formulas typeset by ConTeXt are different from those by
plain TeX. The minimal examples are here: % plain luatex in ConTeXt standalone
$$\int_a^bf(x)dx=F(b)-F(a)$$
\bye % context \starttext
\startformula
\int\nolimits_a^bf(x)dx=F(b)-F(a)
\stopformula
\stoptext Marco said to me that that's because the fonts used by LuaTeX and
ConTeXt are different. This can be seen from the pdf produced by them pdffonts
context.pdf
name type emb sub uni object ID
- --- --- ---
-OLAZTU+LMRoman12-Regular CID Type 0C yes yes yes
18 0
RXHAAY+LatinModernMath-Regular CID Type 0C yes yes yes 19
0JTHTZJ+LatinModernMath-Regular CID Type 0C yes yes yes 20 0
pdffonts plain.pdf
name type emb sub uni object
ID - --- --- --- -
APMHZE+LMMathExtension10-Regular Type 1yes yes no 4 0
AWBTPY+LMMathItalic7-Regular Type 1yes yes no 5 0
ITITNI+LMMathItalic10-RegularType 1yes yes no 6 0
DMNVHT+LMRoman10-Regular Type 1yes yes no 7 0
MGKPYK+LMMathSymbols10-Regular Type 1yes yes no 8 0
even if using the `modern-designsize-virtual` typescript(advice from Marco), I
still get the different outputs. Now, I get confused about this qustion. If
ConTeXt uses LuaTeX as its engine, how can I tune ConTeXt so that it can
produce the same formulas with those in plain TeX? Tim
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___
