[NTG-context] Problem with integral sign

2014-02-09 Thread Jaroslav Hajtmar 

Hello ConTeXist.

I googled a long time, but did not come across anything relevant.

How can type big integral sign to result looked good?

Here is my example:

\startformula
\int \frac{P_n(x)}{Q_m(x)} \, \mathrm{d}x, \quad nm
\stopformula


Thanx
Jaroslav Hajtmar


___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___

Re: [NTG-context] Problem with integral sign

2014-02-09 Thread Marco Patzer 
On 2014–02–09 Jaroslav Hajtmar wrote:

 How can type big integral sign to result looked good?
 
 Here is my example:
 
 \startformula
 \int \frac{P_n(x)}{Q_m(x)} \, \mathrm{d}x, \quad nm
 \stopformula

I don't know how to reduce the space between the integral sign and
the fraction (I assume that's what you meant, by “not looking good”)
except using a manual correction (e.g. \!, or
\edef\int{\int\mskip-10mu}).

As a side note: \mathrm is a font switch, it doesn't take an
argument. Use {\mathrm d}x instead of \mathrm{d}x.

Marco


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___