Re: [NTG-context] Spacing around integrals

2012-11-07 Thread Jeong Dal
Dear Otared, Thank you for the sample files. I may miss the follow-ups. I'll check your samples and choose a good one for me. Thank you again. Best regards, Dalyoung ___ If your question is of interest to others

Re: [NTG-context] Spacing around integrals

2012-11-07 Thread Hans Hagen
On 11/6/2012 5:22 PM, Otared Kavian wrote: Dear Dalyoung, I can confirm that there is still a serious issue with the way mkiv handles the bounds of integral signs, and this has been reported several times by Aditya, myself and others. In particular the latest beta (version 2012.11.06 09:56)

[NTG-context] Spacing around integrals

2012-11-06 Thread Jeong Dal
Dear Aditya, In ntg-context Digest, Vol 99, Issue 59, you mention about \int_a^b, but I could't find the follow-up for that. I also have a similar problem when using \int_a^b. a and b are located at the bottom and top of the integral sign respectively. Also there is a somewhat big space

[NTG-context] Spacing around integrals

2012-09-19 Thread Aditya Mahajan
Hi, The spacing around the integrals is wrong in the current version when using latin modern or xits (but correct when using cambria or euler). Is this due to wrong parameters in the font, or something wrong at the ConTeXt end? Minimal example: \setupbodyfont[xits]