[NTG-context] getmarking does not use mark?

2010-09-27 Thread Steffen Wolfrum
Hi, did I misunderstood something ... or is this simply a bug?! In that example below \getmarking uses the value of title ... and not of mark! (is there an other command to access the value of mark?) Steffen --- \def\KolumneL{\headnumber[chapter]\enskip\getmarking[chapter]}

Re: [NTG-context] getmarking does not use mark?

2010-09-27 Thread Wolfgang Schuster
Am 27.09.2010 um 17:36 schrieb Steffen Wolfrum: Hi, did I misunderstood something ... or is this simply a bug?! In that example below \getmarking uses the value of title ... and not of mark! The name of the key is marking”. Wolfgang

Re: [NTG-context] getmarking does not use mark?

2010-09-27 Thread Steffen Wolfrum
Am 27.09.2010 um 17:50 schrieb Wolfgang Schuster: Am 27.09.2010 um 17:36 schrieb Steffen Wolfrum: Hi, did I misunderstood something ... or is this simply a bug?! In that example below \getmarking uses the value of title ... and not of mark! The name of the key is marking”.

Re: [NTG-context] getmarking does not use mark?

2010-09-27 Thread Wolfgang Schuster
Am 27.09.2010 um 18:16 schrieb Steffen Wolfrum: In that example below \getmarking uses the value of title ... and not of mark! The name of the key is marking”. I don't understand. In context-excursion it says ... After the definition texts can be marked by: \marking[.1.]{.2.}

Re: [NTG-context] getmarking does not use mark?

2010-09-27 Thread Steffen Wolfrum
Am 27.09.2010 um 18:21 schrieb Wolfgang Schuster: Am 27.09.2010 um 18:16 schrieb Steffen Wolfrum: In that example below \getmarking uses the value of title ... and not of mark! The name of the key is marking”. I don't understand. In context-excursion it says ... After the