Re: [NTG-context] handling fonts with missing math (was: math signs in itemize)
On 26-9-2011 08:46, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 11:29, R. Ermers wrote:
Snippets from log file:
! Math error: parameter \Umathquad\displaystyle is not set.
Independent of everything else that has been said in that thread:
wouldn't it be nice to simply fall back on Latin Modern for math when
some font doesn't provide accompanying math glyphs instead of giving
up in the middle of the run? Of course that will give suboptimal
result (in particular everything inside $math$ will be in LM as
opposed to original font), but at least it won't complain about a
missing $\bullet$ and one can always use $\frac{\text{1}}{\text{2}}$
or something similar :).
there is some fall back mechanism that does that but as soon as one
defined his/her own typescript that can interfere
Hans
-
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
| www.pragma-pod.nl
-
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___
Re: [NTG-context] handling fonts with missing math (was: math signs in itemize)
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 19:44, Hans Hagen wrote: there is some fall back mechanism that does that but as soon as one defined his/her own typescript that can interfere How should we define trypescripts to avoid interference then? Mojca ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
[NTG-context] handling fonts with missing math (was: math signs in itemize)
On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 11:29, R. Ermers wrote:
Snippets from log file:
! Math error: parameter \Umathquad\displaystyle is not set.
Independent of everything else that has been said in that thread:
wouldn't it be nice to simply fall back on Latin Modern for math when
some font doesn't provide accompanying math glyphs instead of giving
up in the middle of the run? Of course that will give suboptimal
result (in particular everything inside $math$ will be in LM as
opposed to original font), but at least it won't complain about a
missing $\bullet$ and one can always use $\frac{\text{1}}{\text{2}}$
or something similar :).
Mojca
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___
