In May I discovered that there was a typo in math-eul.tex rendering
the lower-case 'd' an 'e'. Amazingly, the same problem occurs also for
the upper-case 'D', and requires changing the line
\definemathcharacter [D] [nothing] [mr] [45]
into
\definemathcharacter [D] [nothing] [mr] [44]
Johan Sandblom wrote:
In May I discovered that there was a typo in math-eul.tex rendering
the lower-case 'd' an 'e'. Amazingly, the same problem occurs also for
the upper-case 'D', and requires changing the line
\definemathcharacter [D] [nothing] [mr] [45]
into
\definemathcharacter [D]
In the math-eul.tex shown in the contextgarden.net source browser
dated 2003.02.03, which is the only one I have found, the following lines
occur
...
\definemathcharacter [c] [nothing] [mr] [63]
\definemathcharacter [d] [nothing] [mr] [65]
\definemathcharacter [e] [nothing] [mr] [65]
Johan Sandblom said this at Mon, 9 May 2005 09:14:29 +0200:
making 'd' and 'D' print as 'e' and 'E'. I suppose this is a
mistake?
Huh? I think those hex values are correct.
Do you have a test case that doesn't work for you? This works for me (I
have the EulerVM fonts installed):
is not the will to believe, but the
will to find out, which is the exact opposite
-- Bertrand Russell
- Original Message -
From: Adam Lindsay [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Monday, May 9, 2005 10:05 am
Subject: Re: [NTG-context] no 'd' in math-eul.tex
Johan Sandblom said this at Mon, 9 May 2005 09:14:29
-- Bertrand Russell
- Original Message -
From: Adam Lindsay [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Monday, May 9, 2005 10:05 am
Subject: Re: [NTG-context] no 'd' in math-eul.tex
Johan Sandblom said this at Mon, 9 May 2005 09:14:29 +0200:
making 'd' and 'D' print as 'e' and 'E'. I suppose
Johan Sandblom wrote:
In the math-eul.tex shown in the contextgarden.net source browser
dated 2003.02.03, which is the only one I have found, the following lines
occur
...
\definemathcharacter [c] [nothing] [mr] [63]
\definemathcharacter [d] [nothing] [mr] [65]
\definemathcharacter [e]
OKAY!
Ignore my last two messages! :| Sorry, I've been distracted by this EU
project meeting where I'm sitting.
You're absolutely right. This is a stupid, stupid bug. You can fix this
with a patch like the following, in your favourite patch-putting-place:
\starttypescript[math][euler][special]
-- Bertrand Russell
- Original Message -
From: Adam Lindsay [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Monday, May 9, 2005 11:50 am
Subject: Re: [NTG-context] no 'd' in math-eul.tex
OKAY!
Ignore my last two messages! :| Sorry, I've been distracted by
this EU
project meeting where I'm sitting
