[NTG-context] no 'D' in math-eul.tex
In May I discovered that there was a typo in math-eul.tex rendering the lower-case 'd' an 'e'. Amazingly, the same problem occurs also for the upper-case 'D', and requires changing the line \definemathcharacter [D] [nothing] [mr] [45] into \definemathcharacter [D] [nothing] [mr] [44] Apparently this beautiful font is severely underused to allow this typo to survive! Regards, Johan -- Johan Sandblom N8, MRC, Karolinska sjh t +46851776108 17176 Stockholm m +46735521477 Sweden What is wanted is not the will to believe, but the will to find out, which is the exact opposite - Bertrand Russell ___ ntg-context mailing list ntg-context@ntg.nl http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
Re: [NTG-context] no 'D' in math-eul.tex
Johan Sandblom wrote: In May I discovered that there was a typo in math-eul.tex rendering the lower-case 'd' an 'e'. Amazingly, the same problem occurs also for the upper-case 'D', and requires changing the line \definemathcharacter [D] [nothing] [mr] [45] into \definemathcharacter [D] [nothing] [mr] [44] ok, fixed, Apparently this beautiful font is severely underused to allow this typo to survive! or maybe the D is not used that much (those chars are only used alone, not in words, so if one can do with A-C the D is never hit) Hans ___ ntg-context mailing list ntg-context@ntg.nl http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
[NTG-context] no 'd' in math-eul.tex
In the math-eul.tex shown in the contextgarden.net source browser dated 2003.02.03, which is the only one I have found, the following lines occur ... \definemathcharacter [c] [nothing] [mr] [63] \definemathcharacter [d] [nothing] [mr] [65] \definemathcharacter [e] [nothing] [mr] [65] \definemathcharacter [f] [nothing] [mr] [66] ... and ... \definemathcharacter [C] [nothing] [mr] [43] \definemathcharacter [D] [nothing] [mr] [45] \definemathcharacter [E] [nothing] [mr] [45] \definemathcharacter [F] [nothing] [mr] [46] ... making 'd' and 'D' print as 'e' and 'E'. I suppose this is a mistake? Regards, Johan -- Johan Sandblom N8, MRC, Karolinska sjh t +46851776108 17176 Stockholm m +46735521477 Sweden What is wanted is not the will to believe, but the will to find out, which is the exact opposite -- Bertrand Russell ___ ntg-context mailing list ntg-context@ntg.nl http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
Re: [NTG-context] no 'd' in math-eul.tex
Johan Sandblom said this at Mon, 9 May 2005 09:14:29 +0200:
making 'd' and 'D' print as 'e' and 'E'. I suppose this is a
mistake?
Huh? I think those hex values are correct.
Do you have a test case that doesn't work for you? This works for me (I
have the EulerVM fonts installed):
\definetypeface[cheu][rm][serif][charter][default][encoding=ec]
\definetypeface[cheu][mm][math][euler][euler][rscale=1.05]
\setupbodyfont[cheu]
\starttext
\startformula
A + B + C = A^{B^C}
\stopformula
\startformula
a + b + c = a^{b^c}
\stopformula
\stoptext
--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Adam T. Lindsay, Computing Dept. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Lancaster University, InfoLab21+44(0)1524/510.514
Lancaster, LA1 4WA, UK Fax:+44(0)1524/510.492
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
___
ntg-context mailing list
ntg-context@ntg.nl
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
Re: [NTG-context] no 'd' in math-eul.tex
If 'c' and 'C' in your example are changed to
'd' and 'D', it illustrates the point. I also have
the fonts installed following your excellent guide.
Johan
--
Johan Sandblom N8, MRC, Karolinska sjh
t +46851776108 17176 Stockholm
m +46735521477 Sweden
What is wanted is not the will to believe, but the
will to find out, which is the exact opposite
-- Bertrand Russell
- Original Message -
From: Adam Lindsay [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Monday, May 9, 2005 10:05 am
Subject: Re: [NTG-context] no 'd' in math-eul.tex
Johan Sandblom said this at Mon, 9 May 2005 09:14:29 +0200:
making 'd' and 'D' print as 'e' and 'E'. I suppose this is a
mistake?
Huh? I think those hex values are correct.
Do you have a test case that doesn't work for you? This works for
me (I
have the EulerVM fonts installed):
\definetypeface[cheu][rm][serif][charter][default][encoding=ec]
\definetypeface[cheu][mm][math][euler][euler][rscale=1.05]
\setupbodyfont[cheu]
\starttext
\startformula
A + B + C = A^{B^C}
\stopformula
\startformula
a + b + c = a^{b^c}
\stopformula
\stoptext
--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Adam T. Lindsay, Computing Dept. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Lancaster University, InfoLab21+44(0)1524/510.514
Lancaster, LA1 4WA, UK Fax:+44(0)1524/510.492
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
___
ntg-context mailing list
ntg-context@ntg.nl
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
___
ntg-context mailing list
ntg-context@ntg.nl
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
Re: [NTG-context] no 'd' in math-eul.tex
Hmm, disturbing.
What system/engine are you using?
Could you email me with your output (off-list is best), and include
\showfont[zeurm10] as well?
cheers,
adam
Johan Sandblom said this at Mon, 9 May 2005 11:01:51 +0200:
If 'c' and 'C' in your example are changed to
'd' and 'D', it illustrates the point. I also have
the fonts installed following your excellent guide.
Johan
--
Johan Sandblom N8, MRC, Karolinska sjh
t +46851776108 17176 Stockholm
m +46735521477 Sweden
What is wanted is not the will to believe, but the
will to find out, which is the exact opposite
-- Bertrand Russell
- Original Message -
From: Adam Lindsay [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Monday, May 9, 2005 10:05 am
Subject: Re: [NTG-context] no 'd' in math-eul.tex
Johan Sandblom said this at Mon, 9 May 2005 09:14:29 +0200:
making 'd' and 'D' print as 'e' and 'E'. I suppose this is a
mistake?
Huh? I think those hex values are correct.
Do you have a test case that doesn't work for you? This works for
me (I
have the EulerVM fonts installed):
\definetypeface[cheu][rm][serif][charter][default][encoding=ec]
\definetypeface[cheu][mm][math][euler][euler][rscale=1.05]
\setupbodyfont[cheu]
\starttext
\startformula
A + B + C = A^{B^C}
\stopformula
\startformula
a + b + c = a^{b^c}
\stopformula
\stoptext
--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Adam T. Lindsay, Computing Dept. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Lancaster University, InfoLab21+44(0)1524/510.514
Lancaster, LA1 4WA, UK Fax:+44(0)1524/510.492
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
___
ntg-context mailing list
ntg-context@ntg.nl
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
___
ntg-context mailing list
ntg-context@ntg.nl
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Adam T. Lindsay, Computing Dept. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Lancaster University, InfoLab21+44(0)1524/510.514
Lancaster, LA1 4WA, UK Fax:+44(0)1524/510.492
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
___
ntg-context mailing list
ntg-context@ntg.nl
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
Re: [NTG-context] no 'd' in math-eul.tex
Johan Sandblom wrote: In the math-eul.tex shown in the contextgarden.net source browser dated 2003.02.03, which is the only one I have found, the following lines occur ... \definemathcharacter [c] [nothing] [mr] [63] \definemathcharacter [d] [nothing] [mr] [65] \definemathcharacter [e] [nothing] [mr] [65] \definemathcharacter [f] [nothing] [mr] [66] ... and ... \definemathcharacter [C] [nothing] [mr] [43] \definemathcharacter [D] [nothing] [mr] [45] \definemathcharacter [E] [nothing] [mr] [45] \definemathcharacter [F] [nothing] [mr] [46] ... making 'd' and 'D' print as 'e' and 'E'. I suppose this is a mistake? indeed, should be 64 and 44 hans - Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl - ___ ntg-context mailing list ntg-context@ntg.nl http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
Re: [NTG-context] no 'd' in math-eul.tex
OKAY! Ignore my last two messages! :| Sorry, I've been distracted by this EU project meeting where I'm sitting. You're absolutely right. This is a stupid, stupid bug. You can fix this with a patch like the following, in your favourite patch-putting-place: \starttypescript[math][euler][special] \startmathcollection [eul] \definemathcharacter [d] [nothing] [mr] [64] \definemathcharacter [D] [nothing] [mr] [44] \stopmathcollection \stoptypescript I don't have anything against the letter 'd'. Honest! aeam linesay Johan Sandblom said this at Mon, 9 May 2005 09:14:29 +0200: In the math-eul.tex shown in the contextgarden.net source browser dated 2003.02.03, which is the only one I have found, the following lines occur ... \definemathcharacter [c] [nothing] [mr] [63] \definemathcharacter [d] [nothing] [mr] [65] \definemathcharacter [e] [nothing] [mr] [65] \definemathcharacter [f] [nothing] [mr] [66] ... and ... \definemathcharacter [C] [nothing] [mr] [43] \definemathcharacter [D] [nothing] [mr] [45] \definemathcharacter [E] [nothing] [mr] [45] \definemathcharacter [F] [nothing] [mr] [46] ... making 'd' and 'D' print as 'e' and 'E'. I suppose this is a mistake? Regards, Johan -- Johan Sandblom N8, MRC, Karolinska sjh t +46851776108 17176 Stockholm m +46735521477 Sweden What is wanted is not the will to believe, but the will to find out, which is the exact opposite -- Bertrand Russell ___ ntg-context mailing list ntg-context@ntg.nl http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Adam T. Lindsay, Computing Dept. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Lancaster University, InfoLab21+44(0)1524/510.514 Lancaster, LA1 4WA, UK Fax:+44(0)1524/510.492 -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- ___ ntg-context mailing list ntg-context@ntg.nl http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
Re: [NTG-context] no 'd' in math-eul.tex
Thanks, I already repaired it, I just thought it should not be propagated further ... -- Johan Sandblom N8, MRC, Karolinska sjh t +46851776108 17176 Stockholm m +46735521477 Sweden What is wanted is not the will to believe, but the will to find out, which is the exact opposite -- Bertrand Russell - Original Message - From: Adam Lindsay [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Monday, May 9, 2005 11:50 am Subject: Re: [NTG-context] no 'd' in math-eul.tex OKAY! Ignore my last two messages! :| Sorry, I've been distracted by this EU project meeting where I'm sitting. You're absolutely right. This is a stupid, stupid bug. You can fix thiswith a patch like the following, in your favourite patch- putting-place: \starttypescript[math][euler][special] \startmathcollection [eul] \definemathcharacter [d] [nothing] [mr] [64] \definemathcharacter [D] [nothing] [mr] [44] \stopmathcollection \stoptypescript I don't have anything against the letter 'd'. Honest! aeam linesay Johan Sandblom said this at Mon, 9 May 2005 09:14:29 +0200: In the math-eul.tex shown in the contextgarden.net source browser dated 2003.02.03, which is the only one I have found, the following lines occur ... \definemathcharacter [c] [nothing] [mr] [63] \definemathcharacter [d] [nothing] [mr] [65] \definemathcharacter [e] [nothing] [mr] [65] \definemathcharacter [f] [nothing] [mr] [66] ... and ... \definemathcharacter [C] [nothing] [mr] [43] \definemathcharacter [D] [nothing] [mr] [45] \definemathcharacter [E] [nothing] [mr] [45] \definemathcharacter [F] [nothing] [mr] [46] ... making 'd' and 'D' print as 'e' and 'E'. I suppose this is a mistake? Regards, Johan -- Johan Sandblom N8, MRC, Karolinska sjh t +46851776108 17176 Stockholm m +46735521477 Sweden What is wanted is not the will to believe, but the will to find out, which is the exact opposite -- Bertrand Russell ___ ntg-context mailing list ntg-context@ntg.nl http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Adam T. Lindsay, Computing Dept. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Lancaster University, InfoLab21+44(0)1524/510.514 Lancaster, LA1 4WA, UK Fax:+44(0)1524/510.492 -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- ___ ntg-context mailing list ntg-context@ntg.nl http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context ___ ntg-context mailing list ntg-context@ntg.nl http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
