Re: [NTG-context] startMPpage..stopMPpage written to a separate PDF?

2020-04-06 Thread Wolfgang Schuster
Gerben Wierda schrieb am 05.04.2020 um 12:27: On 5 Apr 2020, at 11:34, Hans Hagen wrote: On 4/5/2020 12:29 AM, Gerben Wierda wrote: I have a series of startMPpage—stopMPpage pairs (with MP code inbetween). These now become separate pages in a single PDF. But I need them to become separate

Re: [NTG-context] startMPpage..stopMPpage written to a separate PDF?

2020-04-06 Thread Taco Hoekwater
> On 5 Apr 2020, at 12:27, Gerben Wierda wrote: > > Alternatively, I could have a step before this to turn the input XML into > many separate XMLs and have many ConTeXt runs. Probably that is the best way > to do it. Each generated XML would have all of the original XML except it > would

Re: [NTG-context] startMPpage..stopMPpage written to a separate PDF?

2020-04-05 Thread Gerben Wierda
> On 5 Apr 2020, at 11:34, Hans Hagen wrote: > > On 4/5/2020 12:29 AM, Gerben Wierda wrote: >> I have a series of startMPpage—stopMPpage pairs (with MP code inbetween). >> These now become separate pages in a single PDF. But I need them to become >> separate PDF’s each during my ConTeXt run,

Re: [NTG-context] startMPpage..stopMPpage written to a separate PDF?

2020-04-05 Thread Hans Hagen
On 4/5/2020 12:29 AM, Gerben Wierda wrote: I have a series of startMPpage—stopMPpage pairs (with MP code inbetween). These now become separate pages in a single PDF. But I need them to become separate PDF’s each during my ConTeXt run, with a name of my own choosing. Is this possible? I guess

[NTG-context] startMPpage..stopMPpage written to a separate PDF?

2020-04-04 Thread Gerben Wierda
I have a series of startMPpage—stopMPpage pairs (with MP code inbetween). These now become separate pages in a single PDF. But I need them to become separate PDF’s each during my ConTeXt run, with a name of my own choosing. Is this possible? I guess this will be problematic, but one can hope