Thank you for the solution, Wolfgang. But it seems rather painful to
have to replace every occurrence of _ in my definitions module with
the very verbose \normalsubscript just because it's a module. The new
default catcode for _ introduces extra difficulty when defining math
macros. Would it be
Am 14.01.2011 um 10:15 schrieb Mathieu Boespflug:
Thank you for the solution, Wolfgang. But it seems rather painful to
have to replace every occurrence of _ in my definitions module with
the very verbose \normalsubscript just because it's a module. The new
default catcode for _ introduces
Hi Wolfgang,
thank you for the explanation and the solution.
Best,
Mathieu
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 10:32 AM, Wolfgang Schuster
schuster.wolfg...@googlemail.com wrote:
Am 14.01.2011 um 10:15 schrieb Mathieu Boespflug:
Thank you for the solution, Wolfgang. But it seems rather painful to
On 14-1-2011 10:15, Mathieu Boespflug wrote:
Thank you for the solution, Wolfgang. But it seems rather painful to
have to replace every occurrence of _ in my definitions module with
the very verbose \normalsubscript just because it's a module. The new
default catcode for _ introduces extra
Am 14.01.2011 um 12:01 schrieb Hans Hagen:
just add a space before the _ when it directly follows a \cs, so
... $\cs _2$ ...
but regular text like
... $x_2$ ...
can be left as it is
He put the definitions in a external file which he loads with \usemodule and
then this won’t work
Am 13.01.2011 um 17:18 schrieb Mathieu Boespflug:
Hi all,
today's beta introduced a really strange problem. Consider two source files:
definitions.tex:
\startmodule[definitions]
\def\lambdax{\lambda_x}
\stopmodule[definitions]
main.tex:
\usemodule[definitions]
\starttext
blah
On Thu, 13 Jan 2011, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Am 13.01.2011 um 17:18 schrieb Mathieu Boespflug:
Hi all,
today's beta introduced a really strange problem. Consider two source files:
definitions.tex:
\startmodule[definitions]
\def\lambdax{\lambda_x}
\stopmodule[definitions]
main.tex:
Am 13.01.2011 um 23:43 schrieb Aditya Mahajan:
Untested:
\def\lambdax{\math{\lambda_x}}
should also work.
Not, this won’t work in a module because _ has catcode 11 when you define
the \lambdax command and it doesn’t matter whether you use \math, $ or
\Ustartmath. What happens is that TeX
