Re: [NTG-context] If a Font Has Ligature Glyphs But No Feature?

2022-07-21 Thread Hans Hagen via ntg-context
On 7/20/2022 9:40 PM, Bruce Horrocks via ntg-context wrote: On 20 Jul 2022, at 05:31, Michael Urban via ntg-context wrote: Aside from purchasing a real font product from Linotype at enormous expense and hoping it is better equipped, is there a way to coerce ConTeXt into using the

Re: [NTG-context] If a Font Has Ligature Glyphs But No Feature?

2022-07-20 Thread Bruce Horrocks via ntg-context
> On 20 Jul 2022, at 22:11, Henning Hraban Ramm via ntg-context > wrote: > > Am 20.07.22 um 21:40 schrieb Bruce Horrocks via ntg-context: > >> \definefontfeature [venetian-301-demi-ligatures] [v1=yes,v3=yes] >> \definefontfeature [venetian-301-BT-ligatures] [v2=yes,v3=yes] >> Note that the

Re: [NTG-context] If a Font Has Ligature Glyphs But No Feature?

2022-07-20 Thread Henning Hraban Ramm via ntg-context
Am 20.07.22 um 21:40 schrieb Bruce Horrocks via ntg-context: \definefontfeature [venetian-301-demi-ligatures] [v1=yes,v3=yes] \definefontfeature [venetian-301-BT-ligatures] [v2=yes,v3=yes] Note that the names v1, v2 and v3 are entirely arbitrary. Also, the \starttypescript section sets the

Re: [NTG-context] If a Font Has Ligature Glyphs But No Feature?

2022-07-20 Thread Bruce Horrocks via ntg-context
> On 20 Jul 2022, at 05:31, Michael Urban via ntg-context > wrote: > > Aside from purchasing a real font product from Linotype at enormous expense > and hoping it is better equipped, is there a way to coerce ConTeXt into using > the ligature glyphs for fi and fl? Yes - I had to do the same

Re: [NTG-context] If a Font Has Ligature Glyphs But No Feature?

2022-07-20 Thread Hans Hagen via ntg-context
On 7/20/2022 6:31 AM, Michael Urban via ntg-context wrote: I downloaded something that purports to be Century Expanded from fontsgeek.com. Although the font has fi and fl ligature glyphs, it does not have a ligature font feature and ConTeXt does not use those glyphs. Aside from purchasing a