On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 03:01, Kip Warner wrote:
On Tue, 2012-03-20 at 18:22 -0400, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
Anything else will leave to undersirable behaviour (or segfaults :) ) As I
had said in one of my earlier emails, this is the case for ALL context
macros that take both options and
On 22-3-2012 11:38, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
- The fact that assignments and simple options have to be separated is
not a limitation of TeX, but the way how ConTeXt is programmed. Hans
uses a single command that takes all options inside brackets at once
that defines (results in) something similar
On 22-3-2012 11:38, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
- The fact that assignments and simple options have to be separated is
not a limitation of TeX, but the way how ConTeXt is programmed. Hans
uses a single command that takes all options inside brackets at once
that defines (results in) something similar
On 2012-03-22 11:38, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 03:01, Kip Warner wrote:
On Tue, 2012-03-20 at 18:22 -0400, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
Anything else will leave to undersirable behaviour (or segfaults :) ) As I
had said in one of my earlier emails, this is the case for ALL
On 2012-03-22 12:21, Philipp Gesang wrote:
Therefore the difference to Context deserves mention at least
somewhere in
http://wiki.contextgarden.net/From_LaTeX_to_ConTeXt
which said migrators are most likely to consult first.
Fyi I just added a couple words to the article:
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 3:01 AM, Kip Warner k...@thevertigo.com wrote:
What's probably happening is eventually the system runs out of memory,
the swap gets depleted as well, and as a last act of desperation, the
kernel finally denies an allocation request to luatex which is pretty
rare. The
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 1:05 PM, luigi scarso luigi.sca...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 3:01 AM, Kip Warner k...@thevertigo.com wrote:
What's probably happening is eventually the system runs out of memory,
the swap gets depleted as well, and as a last act of desperation, the
kernel
On Thu, 2012-03-22 at 11:38 +0100, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
- Maybe it could be more explicit, but if you ever take a look at
documentation
Sorry, but which documentation should one obviously be looking at? The
half a dozen PDFs, the several versions of the wiki, the mailing list,
one of the
On Thu, 2012-03-22 at 12:21 +0100, Philipp Gesang wrote:
You’re right, it can cause confusion to people migrating from
Latex where package options, afair, allows mixed key-value/list
syntax (like e.g. Lua does as well). Random example from the
KOMA-Script manual:
On Thu, 2012-03-22 at 12:58 +0100, Philipp Gesang wrote:
Fyi I just added a couple words to the article:
http://wiki.contextgarden.net/From_LaTeX_to_ConTeXt#Optional_Arguments_and_Setups
please expand as needed!
Thank you.
--
Kip Warner -- Software Engineer
OpenPGP encrypted/signed mail
On Tue, 2012-03-20 at 18:22 -0400, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
Anything else will leave to undersirable behaviour (or segfaults :) ) As I
had said in one of my earlier emails, this is the case for ALL context
macros that take both options and assignments.
Fair enough. I got it to work now with,
On 20-3-2012 01:43, Kip Warner wrote:
On Mon, 2012-03-19 at 22:49 +0100, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 19-3-2012 00:29, Kip Warner wrote:
I've cc'd the luatex user mailing list since this is probably, I
suppose, a luatex issue more than a ConTeXt one.
not that probable
Actually highly probably,
On 20-3-2012 06:49, Kip Warner wrote:
On Tue, 2012-03-20 at 06:46 +0100, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
TeX has it’s problem with certain errors, accept it.
It is not a problem with the program raising an error, it was how it
went about doing it. It should not have to take down the entire
operating
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 9:17 AM, Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl wrote:
On 20-3-2012 06:49, Kip Warner wrote:
On Tue, 2012-03-20 at 06:46 +0100, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
TeX has it’s problem with certain errors, accept it.
It is not a problem with the program raising an error, it was how it
went
On Tue, 2012-03-20 at 09:17 +0100, Hans Hagen wrote:
which is not really a crash of my operating system; there is not much
I
can do about this issue I fear.
Totally up to you. I just wanted to bring it to your attention.
--
Kip Warner -- Software Engineer
OpenPGP encrypted/signed mail
On Tue, 2012-03-20 at 06:46 +0100, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
You can’t have a assignment in both parameters because this would lead
to the same problem as before,
combine both settings in one argument and it works.
I must not be doing it right because the item numbers are gone now and
replaced
On Tue, 20 Mar 2012, Kip Warner wrote:
On Tue, 2012-03-20 at 06:46 +0100, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
You can’t have a assignment in both parameters because this would lead
to the same problem as before,
combine both settings in one argument and it works.
I must not be doing it right because
Am 19.03.2012 um 00:29 schrieb Kip Warner:
On Sun, 2012-03-18 at 16:25 -0700, Kip Warner wrote:
On Sat, 2012-03-17 at 11:21 +0100, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Am 17.03.2012 um 10:21 schrieb luigi scarso:
On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 2:47 AM, Kip Warner k...@thevertigo.com wrote:
Hey list,
Is
On 19-3-2012 00:29, Kip Warner wrote:
I've cc'd the luatex user mailing list since this is probably, I
suppose, a luatex issue more than a ConTeXt one.
not that probable
One other thing that I should have made more clear, this only happens
when I insert the aforementioned line correction
On 19-3-2012 00:25, Kip Warner wrote:
The good news is that this is probably what I need. The bad news is
luatex completely blows itself to pieces, allocating memory until the
system crashes.
Packaging itemizes are on a todo list as I sometimes need it myself, but
it has a low priority
On Mon, 2012-03-19 at 22:49 +0100, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 19-3-2012 00:29, Kip Warner wrote:
I've cc'd the luatex user mailing list since this is probably, I
suppose, a luatex issue more than a ConTeXt one.
not that probable
Actually highly probably, since the seg fault is raised in
On Mon, 2012-03-19 at 22:50 +0100, Hans Hagen wrote:
Packaging itemizes are on a todo list as I sometimes need it myself, but
it has a low priority
Ok, but I thought they were already packaged with context?
--
Kip Warner -- Software Engineer
OpenPGP encrypted/signed mail preferred
On Mon, 2012-03-19 at 09:17 +0100, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Make a example because this works:
\starttext
%\dorecurse{2}{\input tufte\par}
\dorecurse{3}{\input tufte\par}
\startitemize[before={\startlinecorrection[blank]},after=
\stoplinecorrection]
\dorecurse{4}{\startitem \input
Am 20.03.2012 um 02:04 schrieb Kip Warner:
On Mon, 2012-03-19 at 09:17 +0100, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Make a example because this works:
\starttext
%\dorecurse{2}{\input tufte\par}
\dorecurse{3}{\input tufte\par}
\startitemize[before={\startlinecorrection[blank]},after=
On Tue, 2012-03-20 at 06:22 +0100, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
The problem is the empty second argument.
\startitemize[before=\startlinecorrection,after=\stoplinecorrection][]
When you pass two arguments with \startitemize the first argument os for
keywords (e.g. packed or fit)
and second
Am 20.03.2012 um 06:31 schrieb Kip Warner:
On Tue, 2012-03-20 at 06:22 +0100, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
The problem is the empty second argument.
\startitemize[before=\startlinecorrection,after=\stoplinecorrection][]
When you pass two arguments with \startitemize the first argument os for
On Tue, 2012-03-20 at 06:46 +0100, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
TeX has it’s problem with certain errors, accept it.
It is not a problem with the program raising an error, it was how it
went about doing it. It should not have to take down the entire
operating system to indicate to the user that
On Sat, 2012-03-17 at 11:21 +0100, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Am 17.03.2012 um 10:21 schrieb luigi scarso:
On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 2:47 AM, Kip Warner k...@thevertigo.com wrote:
Hey list,
Is there any way to hint to ConTeXt that the contents of a \startitemize
\stopitemize pair should
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 12:25 AM, Kip Warner k...@thevertigo.com wrote:
On Sat, 2012-03-17 at 11:21 +0100, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Am 17.03.2012 um 10:21 schrieb luigi scarso:
On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 2:47 AM, Kip Warner k...@thevertigo.com wrote:
Hey list,
Is there any way to hint to
On Sun, 2012-03-18 at 16:25 -0700, Kip Warner wrote:
On Sat, 2012-03-17 at 11:21 +0100, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Am 17.03.2012 um 10:21 schrieb luigi scarso:
On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 2:47 AM, Kip Warner k...@thevertigo.com wrote:
Hey list,
Is there any way to hint to ConTeXt that
On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 2:47 AM, Kip Warner k...@thevertigo.com wrote:
Hey list,
Is there any way to hint to ConTeXt that the contents of a \startitemize
\stopitemize pair should try to be all on the same page?
plain old tex
\vbox{%
\startitemize
\stopitemize%
}
?
--
luigi
Am 17.03.2012 um 10:21 schrieb luigi scarso:
On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 2:47 AM, Kip Warner k...@thevertigo.com wrote:
Hey list,
Is there any way to hint to ConTeXt that the contents of a \startitemize
\stopitemize pair should try to be all on the same page?
plain old tex
\vbox{%
32 matches
Mail list logo
