Re: [NTG-context] Problems with "mathalign"

2007-02-19 Thread Aditya Mahajan
On Mon, 19 Feb 2007, Wim Neimeijer wrote: > Aditya Mahajan wrote: >>> \startbuffer >>> \placeformula >>> \startformula >>> \startalign[m=2,distance=3cm] >>> \NC a \NC =b >>> \NC A \NC =B \NR[+] >>> \NC c \NC =d >>> \NC C \NC =D \NR[+] >>> \stopalign >>> \stopformula >>> \stopbuffer >>> \ty

Re: [NTG-context] Problems with "mathalign"

2007-02-19 Thread Wim Neimeijer
Aditya Mahajan wrote: \startbuffer \placeformula \startformula \startalign[m=2,distance=3cm] \NC a \NC =b \NC A \NC =B \NR[+] \NC c \NC =d \NC C \NC =D \NR[+] \stopalign \stopformula \stopbuffer \typebuffer \getbuffer I can confirm that there is an extra number. I do not know what

Re: [NTG-context] Problems with "mathalign"

2007-01-03 Thread Taco Hoekwater
Aditya Mahajan wrote: > > > I can confirm that there is an extra number. I do not know what is > causing this. I am not aware of anything in core-mat has changed. There is that extra stuff in \everymathematics. Could that be it? Taco ___ ntg-context

Re: [NTG-context] Problems with "mathalign"

2007-01-03 Thread Aditya Mahajan
On Wed, 3 Jan 2007, Mojca Miklavec wrote: > Hello, > > I wanted to keep Aditya busy now that he finished his wonderful new > module ;), so ... > > > I first wanted to ask how to number subformulas in a certain way, but > that I figured out that numbering is already causing some problems on > it