Monday, July 5, 2004 Nikolai Weibull wrote: > * Giuseppe Bilotta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [Jul 05, 2004 14:00]: >> Weird indeed. I'm not using the latest ConTeXt. (Actually I'm >> quite back with the updates ... gotta get down to it.) I'll see >> if upgrading gives me the same problem and in case get a fix.
> OK. I'm now using ConTeXt ver: 2004.6.30 fmt: 2004.7.27 int: english mes: english and your example \usemodule[nath] \starttext $a, b, \dots, n$ \[ a=b, \dots c=d \dots \] \stoptext uses, in order, \ldots, \ldots, \cdots which sounds like the correct behaviour to me. The engine is This is pdfeTeX, Version 3.141592-1.20a-rc4-2.1 (MiKTeX 2.4) >> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] command \string\over } >> >> {No more a valid command. Replace {A \over B} with \frac A >> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] command \string\atop } >> >> {No more a valid command. Use array [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] command \string\choose } >> >> {No more a valid command. Replace {A \choose B} with \binom A >> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> > Ah, of course... >> > nikolai >> >> It works like that? Excellent. > It seems I spoke too soon. It does in fact not work. [EMAIL PROTECTED] can't be > put like that inside the if-statement. A suggestion would be to re-work > the whole section and instead make it > \appendtoks > [EMAIL PROTECTED] command \string\over } > {No more a valid command. Replace {A \string\over B} with \string\frac A B.}} > [EMAIL PROTECTED] command \string\atop } > {No more a valid command. Use array instead.}} > [EMAIL PROTECTED] command \string\choose } > {No more a valid command. Replace {A \string\choose B} > with \string\binom A B. >>> }} > \to\everymath > but I don't know if that's a good solution. It forces you to use > \string\over in the second argument to [EMAIL PROTECTED] which I don't understand > why, but otherwise TeX runs out of stack space. I suppose it's being > expanded even though it shouldn't be. > nikolai Also, I'm not sure that will work with text inside math. Can you design a small test case that uses \over (directly or indirectly) in normal text and in some \text inside a math environment so that I can see what solution works fine? In the meantime, I'm thinking along the lines of something like \def\over{% [EMAIL PROTECTED] command \string\over } {No more a valid command. Replace {A \over B} with \frac A B.}% \let\next\relax [EMAIL PROTECTED] \def\atop{% [EMAIL PROTECTED] command \string\atop } {No more a valid command. Use array instead.}% \let\next\relax [EMAIL PROTECTED] \def\choose{% [EMAIL PROTECTED] command \string\choose } {No more a valid command. Replace {A \choose B} with \binom A B.}% \lext\next\relax [EMAIL PROTECTED] which should be robust enough. Can you try it in the context where my previous solution busted? -- Giuseppe "Oblomov" Bilotta _______________________________________________ ntg-context mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context