Re: [NTG-context] Second derivative ''

2020-03-05 Thread Mikael P. Sundqvist
On Thu, Mar 5, 2020 at 9:09 PM Wolfgang Schuster < wolfgang.schuster.li...@gmail.com> wrote: > Mikael P. Sundqvist schrieb am 05.03.2020 um 20:48: > > Oh, I had not. It looks better with collapsing=1, indeed. A few neq > questions comes to me: > > Does ConTeXt not use the same prime character as

Re: [NTG-context] Second derivative ''

2020-03-05 Thread Wolfgang Schuster
Mikael P. Sundqvist schrieb am 05.03.2020 um 20:48: Oh, I had not. It looks better with collapsing=1, indeed. A few neq questions comes to me: Does ConTeXt not use the same prime character as in TeX/LaTeX? Or has something changed in latin modern? See the attached pdf files (derivatives.pdf

Re: [NTG-context] Second derivative ''

2020-03-05 Thread Mikael P. Sundqvist
On Thu, Mar 5, 2020 at 6:34 PM Hans Hagen wrote: > On 3/5/2020 5:41 PM, Mikael P. Sundqvist wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 5, 2020 at 5:36 PM Aditya Mahajan > > wrote: > > > > On Thu, 5 Mar 2020, Hans Hagen wrote: > > > > > On 3/4/2020 11:44 PM, Weber, Matthias wrote:

Re: [NTG-context] Second derivative ''

2020-03-05 Thread Hans Hagen
On 3/5/2020 5:41 PM, Mikael P. Sundqvist wrote: On Thu, Mar 5, 2020 at 5:36 PM Aditya Mahajan > wrote: On Thu, 5 Mar 2020, Hans Hagen wrote: > On 3/4/2020 11:44 PM, Weber, Matthias wrote: >> Dear List, >> >> \starttext >> \startformula

Re: [NTG-context] Second derivative ''

2020-03-05 Thread Hans Hagen
On 3/5/2020 5:36 PM, Aditya Mahajan wrote: On Thu, 5 Mar 2020, Hans Hagen wrote: On 3/4/2020 11:44 PM, Weber, Matthias wrote: Dear List, \starttext \startformula \left(f\right)'' = f'' \stopformula \stoptext has the second apostrophe set too low. This is in MKIV on ConTeXt live as well

Re: [NTG-context] Second derivative ''

2020-03-05 Thread Mikael P. Sundqvist
On Thu, Mar 5, 2020 at 5:36 PM Aditya Mahajan wrote: > On Thu, 5 Mar 2020, Hans Hagen wrote: > > > On 3/4/2020 11:44 PM, Weber, Matthias wrote: > >> Dear List, > >> > >> \starttext > >> \startformula > >> \left(f\right)'' = f'' > >> \stopformula > >> \stoptext > >> > >> has the second apostrophe

Re: [NTG-context] Second derivative ''

2020-03-05 Thread Aditya Mahajan
On Thu, 5 Mar 2020, Hans Hagen wrote: On 3/4/2020 11:44 PM, Weber, Matthias wrote: Dear List, \starttext \startformula \left(f\right)'' = f'' \stopformula \stoptext has the second apostrophe set too low. This is in MKIV on ConTeXt live as well as in my slightly older version. What is the

Re: [NTG-context] Second derivative ''

2020-03-05 Thread Hans Hagen
On 3/5/2020 10:12 AM, Hans Hagen wrote: On 3/4/2020 11:44 PM, Weber, Matthias wrote: Dear List, \starttext \startformula \left(f\right)'' = f'' \stopformula \stoptext has the second apostrophe set too low. This is in MKIV on ConTeXt live as well as in my slightly older version. What is the

Re: [NTG-context] Second derivative ''

2020-03-05 Thread Hans Hagen
On 3/4/2020 11:44 PM, Weber, Matthias wrote: Dear List, \starttext \startformula \left(f\right)'' = f'' \stopformula \stoptext has the second apostrophe set too low. This is in MKIV on ConTeXt live as well as in my slightly older version. What is the “right” way to typeset a second

Re: [NTG-context] Second derivative ''

2020-03-04 Thread Henri Menke
Looks like the ligature is broken. \starttext \startformula \left(f\right)'' = f'' \stopformula \startformula \left(f\right)″ = f″ \stopformula \stoptext On 3/5/20 11:44 AM, Weber, Matthias wrote: > Dear List, > > \starttext > \startformula > \left(f\right)'' = f'' > \stopformula > \stoptext