On Sat, Jul 24, 2004 at 11:36:03AM +0200, Vit Zyka wrote:
Furthermore, the shading variants for linear_shade do not correspond
with those listed in the metafun manual, page 180. Variant 2 is missing
and behaves like variant 3 should.
Not so exactly. The today reality is a bit richer than
Eckhart Guthöhrlein wrote:
On Sat, Jul 24, 2004 at 11:36:03AM +0200, Vit Zyka wrote:
Furthermore, the shading variants for linear_shade do not correspond
with those listed in the metafun manual, page 180. Variant 2 is missing
and behaves like variant 3 should.
Not so exactly. The today
On Tue, Jul 27, 2004 at 01:37:06PM +0200, Hans Hagen wrote:
But anyway, transparency is ignored when using shading. Is there any
possibility to achieve a gradient from, i.e., completely transparent to
completely intransparent white?
no(t yet), i dunno if pdf supports that -)
That's
Eckhart Guthöhrlein wrote:
On Tue, Jul 27, 2004 at 01:37:06PM +0200, Hans Hagen wrote:
But anyway, transparency is ignored when using shading. Is there any
possibility to achieve a gradient from, i.e., completely transparent to
completely intransparent white?
no(t yet), i dunno if pdf
Furthermore, the shading variants for linear_shade do not correspond
with those listed in the metafun manual, page 180. Variant 2 is missing
and behaves like variant 3 should.
Not so exactly. The today reality is a bit richer than that in the
Metafun manual. One can choose from 8 directions:
