Re: [NTG-context] Some update woes on Linux

2007-11-12 Thread Jeff Smith
On Nov 10, 2007 9:23 PM, Mojca Miklavec [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Of course not :)

 You can say (features=default is optional)
 \definefontsynonym[SomeFont][name:Font Name][features=default]
 which means that XeTeX will call the font
 \font\somefont=FontName;mapping=tex-text,... (tex-text is
 implied by features=default)

 Back in January and before one achived the same by saying
 \definefontsynonym[SomeFont]['Font Name;mapping=tex-text'][encoding=uc]
 Now encoding=uc is not needed any more since it's implied when one
 runs XeTeX or LuaTeX. To be honest, it's not completely clear to me
 what should happen with type-xtx typescripts (how to remove uc
 encoding from there).

 The other possibility is to say
 \definefontsynonym[SomeFont][file:lmroman12-regular][features=default]
 which means that XeTeX will load the font lmroman12-regular.otf from
 texmf tree, the equivalent in plain XeTeX being
 \font\somefont=[lmroman12-regular];mapping=tex-text,...

 When there is neither file: nor name: prefix
 (\definefontsynonym[SomeFont][lmr12]), it means that XeTeX will try to
 load a font in this order
 - lmr12 (good old tfm fonts)
 - lmr12
 - [lmr12]
 (the order might change)

Hmmm.. must I use \setupbodyfont as well when using the
\definefontsynonym method? Because those alternative methods don't
work.
This works:

\definetypeface[corps][rm][Xserif][Garamond Premier Pro]
\setupbodyfont[corps,12pt]

But not this:

\definefontsynonym[corps][name:Garamond Premier Pro][features=default]
 or
\definefontsynonym[corps][file:GaramondPremrPro.][features=default]
 or
\definefontsynonym[corps][Garamond Premier Pro][features=default]

I see the default Times font instead (it compiles ok).

Jeff
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___


Re: [NTG-context] Some update woes on Linux

2007-11-10 Thread Taco Hoekwater
Jeff Smith wrote:
 Hi again,
 
 Sorry for the delay, I was taken with real life worries for a bit.
 
 So, I realized I did have some leftovers from an earlier installation
 attempt. I cleaned everything and reinstalled TeXLive from the CD,
 from scratch. I will wait a bit before updating ConTeXt again, because
 right now I just want to access my system fonts (I'm on Linux) with
 XeTeX and I can't seem to manage to do that anymore. Everything else
 works. Now I just can't remember what I did back on Ubuntu
 Edgy/Feisty. When I run:
 
 fc-list
 
 I do see my fonts listed (after a fc-cache -f). What do I need more?

I guess you have to setup OSFONTDIR (in texmf.cnf).

Best wishes,
Taco


___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___


Re: [NTG-context] Some update woes on Linux

2007-11-10 Thread Mojca Miklavec
On 11/9/07, Jeff Smith wrote:
 Hi again,

 Sorry for the delay, I was taken with real life worries for a bit.

 So, I realized I did have some leftovers from an earlier installation
 attempt. I cleaned everything and reinstalled TeXLive from the CD,
 from scratch. I will wait a bit before updating ConTeXt again, because
 right now I just want to access my system fonts (I'm on Linux) with
 XeTeX and I can't seem to manage to do that anymore. Everything else
 works. Now I just can't remember what I did back on Ubuntu
 Edgy/Feisty. When I run:

 fc-list

 I do see my fonts listed (after a fc-cache -f). What do I need more?

You can either use

\definetypeface[MyFace][rm][Xserif][Font Name]
\setupbodyfont[MyFace,12pt]

or prepare some more complex typescript examples. Note that if you
want to use automatic mapping from --/--- to endash/emdashes, syntax
has changed a bit since January until now.

Can you send examples that don't work any more (I could imagine that
you were using the new syntax (file: or name: prefix) which wasn't
available ack in January).

Mojca
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___


Re: [NTG-context] Some update woes on Linux

2007-11-10 Thread John Culleton
On Saturday 10 November 2007 06:07:39 am Mojca Miklavec wrote:
 On 11/9/07, Jeff Smith wrote:
  Hi again,
When I run:
 
  fc-list
 
  I do see my fonts listed (after a fc-cache -f). What do I need more?

 You can either use

 \definetypeface[MyFace][rm][Xserif][Font Name]
 \setupbodyfont[MyFace,12pt]


Ah, interesting.  And what exactly is the content of Font Name?  for example 
if fc-list displays:
Bitstream Charter:style=Regular

does that whole string go into the space for Font Name?

Here is a more complex example:
DejaVu Sans,DejaVu Sans Condensed:style=Condensed Bold Oblique,Bold Oblique

I assume, perhaps wrongly, that this is in lieu of creating a typescript.

The whole subject raises interesting possibilities for straying off the 
traditional TeX reservation as far as font selection is concerned. 

I use the TeXLive distro, but with pdftex updated to 
pdfTeX 3.141592-1.40.5-2.2 (Web2C 7.5.6)


-- 
John Culleton
Precision Typesetting
Able Indexers and Typesetters
http://wexfordpress.com
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___


Re: [NTG-context] Some update woes on Linux

2007-11-10 Thread Wolfgang Schuster
On Sat, 10 Nov 2007 09:24:32 -0500
John Culleton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 On Saturday 10 November 2007 06:07:39 am Mojca Miklavec wrote:
  On 11/9/07, Jeff Smith wrote:
   Hi again,
 When I run:
  
   fc-list
  
   I do see my fonts listed (after a fc-cache -f). What do I need more?
 
  You can either use
 
  \definetypeface[MyFace][rm][Xserif][Font Name]
  \setupbodyfont[MyFace,12pt]
 
 
 Ah, interesting.  And what exactly is the content of Font Name?  for example 
 if fc-list displays:
 Bitstream Charter:style=Regular

The font name is Bitstream Charter, the style entry is only needed
for italic or bold style and you can write Bitstream Charter/I for
italic or Bitstream Charter/B for the bold style.

 does that whole string go into the space for Font Name?
 
 Here is a more complex example:
 DejaVu Sans,DejaVu Sans Condensed:style=Condensed Bold Oblique,Bold Oblique

I would say you can write DejaVu Sans for the normal version and
DejaVu Sans Condensed for the narrow version.

Choosing the bold and italic styles should be possible with the feature
tags in ConTeXt but I never tried the new font setups for XeTeX in
ConTeXt.

 I assume, perhaps wrongly, that this is in lieu of creating a typescript.
 
 The whole subject raises interesting possibilities for straying off the 
 traditional TeX reservation as far as font selection is concerned. 
 
 I use the TeXLive distro, but with pdftex updated to 
 pdfTeX 3.141592-1.40.5-2.2 (Web2C 7.5.6)

Wolfgang
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___


Re: [NTG-context] Some update woes on Linux

2007-11-10 Thread Mojca Miklavec
On 11/10/07, John Culleton wrote:
 On Saturday 10 November 2007 06:07:39 am Mojca Miklavec wrote:
  On 11/9/07, Jeff Smith wrote:
   Hi again,
 When I run:
  
   fc-list
  
   I do see my fonts listed (after a fc-cache -f). What do I need more?
 
  You can either use
 
  \definetypeface[MyFace][rm][Xserif][Font Name]
  \setupbodyfont[MyFace,12pt]
 

 Ah, interesting.  And what exactly is the content of Font Name?  for example
 if fc-list displays:
 Bitstream Charter:style=Regular

 does that whole string go into the space for Font Name?

Unless it's broken this should work:
\definetypeface[MyFace][rm][Xserif][Bitstream Charter]

 Here is a more complex example:
 DejaVu Sans,DejaVu Sans Condensed:style=Condensed Bold Oblique,Bold Oblique

 I assume, perhaps wrongly, that this is in lieu of creating a typescript.

I don't know how it works in that case, I should test. Xserif uses
/B, /I and /BI to get \bf, \it and \bi working. I have no idea
how XeTeX handles condensed bold oblique, but I would guess that you
can provide
\definetypeface[MyFace][rm][Xserif][DejaVu Sans Condensed]

 The whole subject raises interesting possibilities for straying off the
 traditional TeX reservation as far as font selection is concerned.

 I use the TeXLive distro, but with pdftex updated to
 pdfTeX 3.141592-1.40.5-2.2 (Web2C 7.5.6)

But you need XeTeX for that.

Mojca
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___


Re: [NTG-context] Some update woes on Linux

2007-11-10 Thread Jeff Smith
On Nov 10, 2007 6:07 AM, Mojca Miklavec [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 You can either use

 \definetypeface[MyFace][rm][Xserif][Font Name]
 \setupbodyfont[MyFace,12pt]

 or prepare some more complex typescript examples. Note that if you
 want to use automatic mapping from --/--- to endash/emdashes, syntax
 has changed a bit since January until now.

 Can you send examples that don't work any more (I could imagine that
 you were using the new syntax (file: or name: prefix) which wasn't
 available ack in January).

Wow. I'm the worst ConTeXt user ever. I've asked for help several
times now it's mostly been because I was too careless. In this case,
my document had no \setupbodyfont. I've always used the Xserif way.
*reddens in shame* :-(

That being said, I'm interested to know more about the new sytax. Is
it documented anywhere?

Thanks, and sorry!
Jeff
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___


Re: [NTG-context] Some update woes on Linux

2007-11-10 Thread Mojca Miklavec
On 11/10/07, Jeff Smith wrote:
 On Nov 10, 2007 6:07 AM, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
  You can either use
 
  \definetypeface[MyFace][rm][Xserif][Font Name]
  \setupbodyfont[MyFace,12pt]
 
  or prepare some more complex typescript examples. Note that if you
  want to use automatic mapping from --/--- to endash/emdashes, syntax
  has changed a bit since January until now.
 
  Can you send examples that don't work any more (I could imagine that
  you were using the new syntax (file: or name: prefix) which wasn't
  available ack in January).

 Wow. I'm the worst ConTeXt user ever. I've asked for help several
 times now it's mostly been because I was too careless. In this case,
 my document had no \setupbodyfont. I've always used the Xserif way.
 *reddens in shame* :-(

 That being said, I'm interested to know more about the new sytax. Is
 it documented anywhere?

Of course not :)

You can say (features=default is optional)
\definefontsynonym[SomeFont][name:Font Name][features=default]
which means that XeTeX will call the font
\font\somefont=FontName;mapping=tex-text,... (tex-text is
implied by features=default)

Back in January and before one achived the same by saying
\definefontsynonym[SomeFont]['Font Name;mapping=tex-text'][encoding=uc]
Now encoding=uc is not needed any more since it's implied when one
runs XeTeX or LuaTeX. To be honest, it's not completely clear to me
what should happen with type-xtx typescripts (how to remove uc
encoding from there).

The other possibility is to say
\definefontsynonym[SomeFont][file:lmroman12-regular][features=default]
which means that XeTeX will load the font lmroman12-regular.otf from
texmf tree, the equivalent in plain XeTeX being
\font\somefont=[lmroman12-regular];mapping=tex-text,...

When there is neither file: nor name: prefix
(\definefontsynonym[SomeFont][lmr12]), it means that XeTeX will try to
load a font in this order
- lmr12 (good old tfm fonts)
- lmr12
- [lmr12]
(the order might change)

Mojca
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___


Re: [NTG-context] Some update woes on Linux

2007-11-10 Thread Arthur Reutenauer
 When there is neither file: nor name: prefix
 (\definefontsynonym[SomeFont][lmr12]), it means that XeTeX will try to
 load a font in this order
 - lmr12 (good old tfm fonts)
 - lmr12
 - [lmr12]

  The last two items meaning, respectively:

  • lmr12 Try and load the *font name* lmr12 as an installed font
(first string in the output of fc-list, Display Name in Apple
Fontbook, etc.)—This is the recommended option in XeteX, by the way
  • [lmr12] Try and load the *file name* lmr12 from the texmf tree (as
looked up by the kpathsea library)
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___


Re: [NTG-context] Some update woes on Linux

2007-11-09 Thread Jeff Smith
Hi again,

Sorry for the delay, I was taken with real life worries for a bit.

So, I realized I did have some leftovers from an earlier installation
attempt. I cleaned everything and reinstalled TeXLive from the CD,
from scratch. I will wait a bit before updating ConTeXt again, because
right now I just want to access my system fonts (I'm on Linux) with
XeTeX and I can't seem to manage to do that anymore. Everything else
works. Now I just can't remember what I did back on Ubuntu
Edgy/Feisty. When I run:

fc-list

I do see my fonts listed (after a fc-cache -f). What do I need more?

Thanks for all the help!
Jeff
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___


Re: [NTG-context] Some update woes on Linux

2007-11-07 Thread Martin Schröder
2007/11/7, Jeff Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
 When I run texexec from inside my editor (Winefish), it still reports
 the bad format files like I said earlier. I have no idea how that can
 happen. Linux is really making me feel stupid (my switch from

You probably got new formats in ~/.texlive2007/texmf-var and have old
formats still under /var, and the editor only sees the formats under
/var. But this shouldn't happen. You restarted your editor? :-)
Check the output of texconfig conf.

Best
   Martin
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___


Re: [NTG-context] Some update woes on Linux

2007-11-06 Thread Arthur Reutenauer
 texexec --make --all

  texexec --xtx --make --all

  Otherwise you generate the formats for pdfTeX.

Arthur
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___


Re: [NTG-context] Some update woes on Linux

2007-11-06 Thread Jeff Smith
On Nov 6, 2007 4:59 PM, Arthur Reutenauer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  texexec --make --all

   texexec --xtx --make --all

While I could have sworn this simple blunder of mine was the correct
explanation for my problems, it turns out it's not. I still get the
same error!

Jeff
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___


Re: [NTG-context] Some update woes on Linux

2007-11-06 Thread Mojca Miklavec
Hello,

Most things seem to be fine, you only forgot to run
texexec --xtx --make --all
to make the XeTeX-specific format.

Mojca

On 11/6/07, Jeff Smith wrote:
 Hi all,

 After searching the archives and reading the wikis, I'm still at loss
 on this one. :(

 I installed TexLive 2007 on Ubuntu Gutsy through the repository
 package. All went well.

 However, given that I have to use XeTeX and that the ConTeXt that was
 installed with the package dates from May 2007, which is between
 January and 08.29, to be sure everything was okay I updated ConTeXt.

 I did it manually because ctxtools didn't work. A problem with the
 paths. First red flag, but I went on manually.

 I got the newest cont-tmf.zip and unzipped it in /usr/share/texmf and
 regenerated the formats by doing:

 texexec --make --all

 To check I had the correct version, I ran, on the commandline, these two:

 texexec --check

 and:

 ctxtools --contextversion

 Both gave me 2007.09.28 16:52, which seems quite correct.

 However, when I try to compile a document (with the --xtx option), I
 get the following error:

 ConTeXt  ver: 2007.04.17 12:51 MKII  fmt: 2007.11.5  int: english/english

 language: language en is active
 system  : cont-new loaded
 (/usr/share/texmf/tex/context/base/cont-new.tex

 FatalError  : Your format does not match the base files!

 FormatVersion   : 2007.04.17 12:51 MKII
 FilesVersion: 2007.09.28 16:52

 Clearly, there is something I must do that I don't know about or that
 I haven't found anywhere. Anyone can help? I figure it's simple -- and
 with all those numerous update questions around, I'm still stumped.

 Many thanks in advance for any help.
 Cheers!
 Jeff Smith
 ___
 If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
 Wiki!

 maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
 webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
 archive  : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
 wiki : http://contextgarden.net
 ___

___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___


Re: [NTG-context] Some update woes on Linux

2007-11-06 Thread Jeff Smith
On Nov 6, 2007 5:07 PM, Mojca Miklavec [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hello,

 Most things seem to be fine, you only forgot to run
 texexec --xtx --make --all
 to make the XeTeX-specific format.

 Mojca

Uhm, while I first reported it didn't work, it probably has, but my
installation behaves strangely and I really cannot understand why.
When I run texexec from the command line, it works -- to a point,
meaning that the error I reported does not occur (there is another one
though).

When I run texexec from inside my editor (Winefish), it still reports
the bad format files like I said earlier. I have no idea how that can
happen. Linux is really making me feel stupid (my switch from Windows
is relatively recent).

That being said, if we continue on with my running texexec from the
commandline, as I said above, something else happens.:

** WARNING ** This .map file looks like a dvips format fontmap file.
** WARNING ** -- Current input buffer is: lmbsy5
LMMathSymbols5-BoldItalicenclmmathsy ReEncodeFont
lm-mathsy.enc  lmbsy5.pfb
** WARNING ** -- Reading fontmap file stopped at: file=lm-math.map, line=7.
** WARNING ** This .map file looks like a dvips format fontmap file.
** WARNING ** -- Current input buffer is: rm-lmb10 LMRoman10-Demi
enclmrm ReEncodeFont lm-rm.enc lmb10.pfb
** WARNING ** -- Reading fontmap file stopped at: file=lm-rm.map, line=7.

Also, it seems I can't access my system fonts. But I did run fc-cache
-f (-v). Is there something else to do? When I run fc-list, I do see
my system fonts that I should be able to use...

Thanks for all the help!
Jeff
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___


Re: [NTG-context] Some update woes on Linux

2007-11-06 Thread Mojca Miklavec
On 11/7/07, Jeff Smith wrote:
 On Nov 6, 2007 5:07 PM, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
  Hello,
 
  Most things seem to be fine, you only forgot to run
  texexec --xtx --make --all
  to make the XeTeX-specific format.
 
  Mojca

 Uhm, while I first reported it didn't work, it probably has, but my
 installation behaves strangely and I really cannot understand why.
 When I run texexec from the command line, it works -- to a point,
 meaning that the error I reported does not occur (there is another one
 though).

 When I run texexec from inside my editor (Winefish), it still reports
 the bad format files like I said earlier. I have no idea how that can
 happen. Linux is really making me feel stupid (my switch from Windows
 is relatively recent).

 That being said, if we continue on with my running texexec from the
 commandline, as I said above, something else happens.:

 ** WARNING ** This .map file looks like a dvips format fontmap file.
 ** WARNING ** -- Current input buffer is: lmbsy5
 LMMathSymbols5-BoldItalicenclmmathsy ReEncodeFont
 lm-mathsy.enc  lmbsy5.pfb
 ** WARNING ** -- Reading fontmap file stopped at: file=lm-math.map, line=7.
 ** WARNING ** This .map file looks like a dvips format fontmap file.
 ** WARNING ** -- Current input buffer is: rm-lmb10 LMRoman10-Demi
 enclmrm ReEncodeFont lm-rm.enc lmb10.pfb
 ** WARNING ** -- Reading fontmap file stopped at: file=lm-rm.map, line=7.

 Also, it seems I can't access my system fonts. But I did run fc-cache
 -f (-v). Is there something else to do? When I run fc-list, I do see
 my system fonts that I should be able to use...

That's a well-known error. (To be completely honest, I'm not sure if
those files are needed at all and when/why they're needed.)

You need these files:
http://minimals.contextgarden.net/fonts/common/fonts/map/dvipdfm/
which can be also fetched with
rsync -rvzctl
rsync://contextgarden.net/minimals/fonts/common/fonts/map/dvipdfm .
You need to put them to [texmf]/fonts/map/dvipdfm and run mktexlsr.

I have no idea about the other error (different behaviour in shell 
in text editor). How did you install TeX? Do you have any TeX-related
environmental variables?

Mojca
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___