On 15-9-2012 20:06, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
On Sat, 15 Sep 2012, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Am 15.09.2012 um 00:06 schrieb Aditya Mahajan adit...@umich.edu:
Thanks for the diagnosis. What will be a good way to fix this? I
think that
Am 15.09.2012 um 00:06 schrieb Aditya Mahajan adit...@umich.edu:
Thanks for the diagnosis. What will be a good way to fix this? I think that
\expanded{\setupcounter[#1][\c!start=\ifx\p_start\empty0\else\number\p_start\fi.,...]}
should work (but I haven't tested it yet).
I would do the
On Sat, 15 Sep 2012, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Am 15.09.2012 um 00:06 schrieb Aditya Mahajan adit...@umich.edu:
Thanks for the diagnosis. What will be a good way to fix this? I think that
\expanded{\setupcounter[#1][\c!start=\ifx\p_start\empty0\else\number\p_start\fi.,...]}
should work (but
On Fri, 14 Sep 2012, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Am 14.09.2012 um 00:36 schrieb Aditya Mahajan adit...@umich.edu:
I have been able to isolate the bug to the update on 2012.07.09; specifically
to this commit.
Hi Aditya,
Yes it is a strange behaviour and it appears only when using mkiv and reversed
itemize, even with
\setuppagenumber[start=12]
instead of
\setupuserpagenumber[start=12]
Also the pagenumber remains unchanged with either of these commands, which
means that it's a bug.
On Thu, 13 Sep 2012, Otared Kavian wrote:
On 13 sept. 2012, at 02:34, Aditya Mahajan adit...@umich.edu wrote:
For some reason, the numbering in itemize is affected by the value of userpage!
\setupuserpagenumber[start=12]
\starttext
\startitemize[n,reverse]
\item One
\item Two
\stopitemize
On Thu, 13 Sep 2012, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
On Thu, 13 Sep 2012, Otared Kavian wrote:
On 13 sept. 2012, at 02:34, Aditya Mahajan adit...@umich.edu wrote:
For some reason, the numbering in itemize is affected by the value of
userpage!
\setupuserpagenumber[start=12]
\starttext
On Thu, 13 Sep 2012, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
On Thu, 13 Sep 2012, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
On Thu, 13 Sep 2012, Otared Kavian wrote:
On 13 sept. 2012, at 02:34, Aditya Mahajan adit...@umich.edu wrote:
For some reason, the numbering in itemize is affected by the value of
userpage!
Am 14.09.2012 um 00:36 schrieb Aditya Mahajan adit...@umich.edu:
I have been able to isolate the bug to the update on 2012.07.09; specifically
to this commit.
What your got is already reversed, isn't it?
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 8:34 AM, Aditya Mahajan adit...@umich.edu wrote:
Hi,
For some reason, the numbering in itemize is affected by the value of
userpage!
\setupuserpagenumber[start=12]
\starttext
\startitemize[n,reverse]
\item One
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 8:34 AM, Aditya Mahajan adit...@umich.edu wrote:
Hi,
For some reason, the numbering in itemize is affected by the value of
userpage!
\setupuserpagenumber[start=12]
\starttext
\startitemize[n,reverse]
\item One
\item Two
\stopitemize
\stoptext
With ConTeXt
11 matches
Mail list logo
