Re: [NTG-context] Superscript text size
Selon Aditya Mahajan [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Tue, 22 Jan 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Selon Aditya Mahajan [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Mon, 21 Jan 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
The superscript in expressions like $R^N$ seems to be typeset with a
bigger
font
size in ConTeXt than in LaTeX. Is it the wanted behaviour? From the
typographic
point of view, which is the best of the two renderings?
Thanks for your advice,
That should not happen. I cannot see the different from my eyes. Here is
my example. In both cases, bodyfont is 10pt, and scriptsize is 7pt. Do you
see the differece?
ConTeXT:
\setupbodyfont[10pt]
\starttext $R^N$ \stoptext
LaTeX:
\documentclass{minimal}
\usepackage{lmodern}
\begin{document}
$R^N$
\end{document}
As far as my eyes can see, the results are the same with 10pt and 11pt as
document text size, but not with 12pt. Your two examples in 12pt look
different
to me. Am I wrong?
In the latex example, you need to change the document class to article, if
you want 12pt fonts. To my eye, there is no difference between the two.
But pdffonts tells me that latex is using LM Math Italic 8pt while ConTeXt
is using LM Math Italic 9pt. This is not conclusive evidence since the
fonts could be scaled.
Yes, it seemed to me that the font was a bit larger in ConTeXt than in LaTeX, so
9pt vs 8pt seems coherent with that feeling. Of course, I had to zoom to see a
real difference...
In any case, if you want to change ConTeXt's defaults for 12pt, you can
redefine the following
\unprotect
\definebodyfontenvironment
[\!!twelvepoint]
[\s!text=\!!twelvepoint,
\s!script=\!!ninepoint,
\s!scriptscript=\!!sevenpoint,
\c!x=\!!tenpoint,
\c!xx=\!!eightpoint,
\c!big=\!!fourteenpointfour,
\c!small=\!!tenpoint]
\protect
This is just copied from font-ini.tex. You can use 12pt, 11pt etc rather
than the predefined macros if you want.
Thank you for this solution. I'll try it if I don't get used to the ConTeXt
size.
Aditya
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl /
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___
Re: [NTG-context] Superscript text size
On Mon, 21 Jan 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
The superscript in expressions like $R^N$ seems to be typeset with a bigger
font
size in ConTeXt than in LaTeX. Is it the wanted behaviour? From the
typographic
point of view, which is the best of the two renderings?
Thanks for your advice,
That should not happen. I cannot see the different from my eyes. Here is
my example. In both cases, bodyfont is 10pt, and scriptsize is 7pt. Do you
see the differece?
ConTeXT:
\setupbodyfont[10pt]
\starttext $R^N$ \stoptext
LaTeX:
\documentclass{minimal}
\usepackage{lmodern}
\begin{document}
$R^N$
\end{document}
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___
Re: [NTG-context] Superscript text size
Selon Aditya Mahajan [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Mon, 21 Jan 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
The superscript in expressions like $R^N$ seems to be typeset with a bigger
font
size in ConTeXt than in LaTeX. Is it the wanted behaviour? From the
typographic
point of view, which is the best of the two renderings?
Thanks for your advice,
That should not happen. I cannot see the different from my eyes. Here is
my example. In both cases, bodyfont is 10pt, and scriptsize is 7pt. Do you
see the differece?
ConTeXT:
\setupbodyfont[10pt]
\starttext $R^N$ \stoptext
LaTeX:
\documentclass{minimal}
\usepackage{lmodern}
\begin{document}
$R^N$
\end{document}
As far as my eyes can see, the results are the same with 10pt and 11pt as
document text size, but not with 12pt. Your two examples in 12pt look different
to me. Am I wrong?
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl /
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___
Re: [NTG-context] Superscript text size
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: As far as my eyes can see, the results are the same with 10pt and 11pt as document text size, but not with 12pt. Your two examples in 12pt look different to me. Am I wrong? context fonts sizes are not modelled after latex so i can imagine such differences to exist Hans - Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl - ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
Re: [NTG-context] Superscript text size
On Tue, 22 Jan 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Selon Aditya Mahajan [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Mon, 21 Jan 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
The superscript in expressions like $R^N$ seems to be typeset with a bigger
font
size in ConTeXt than in LaTeX. Is it the wanted behaviour? From the
typographic
point of view, which is the best of the two renderings?
Thanks for your advice,
That should not happen. I cannot see the different from my eyes. Here is
my example. In both cases, bodyfont is 10pt, and scriptsize is 7pt. Do you
see the differece?
ConTeXT:
\setupbodyfont[10pt]
\starttext $R^N$ \stoptext
LaTeX:
\documentclass{minimal}
\usepackage{lmodern}
\begin{document}
$R^N$
\end{document}
As far as my eyes can see, the results are the same with 10pt and 11pt as
document text size, but not with 12pt. Your two examples in 12pt look
different
to me. Am I wrong?
In the latex example, you need to change the document class to article, if
you want 12pt fonts. To my eye, there is no difference between the two.
But pdffonts tells me that latex is using LM Math Italic 8pt while ConTeXt
is using LM Math Italic 9pt. This is not conclusive evidence since the
fonts could be scaled.
In any case, if you want to change ConTeXt's defaults for 12pt, you can
redefine the following
\unprotect
\definebodyfontenvironment
[\!!twelvepoint]
[\s!text=\!!twelvepoint,
\s!script=\!!ninepoint,
\s!scriptscript=\!!sevenpoint,
\c!x=\!!tenpoint,
\c!xx=\!!eightpoint,
\c!big=\!!fourteenpointfour,
\c!small=\!!tenpoint]
\protect
This is just copied from font-ini.tex. You can use 12pt, 11pt etc rather
than the predefined macros if you want.
Aditya
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___
