Re: [NTG-context] Testing TeX Live 2012

2012-05-22 Thread Taco Hoekwater
On 05/22/2012 10:31 AM, Marco Pessotto wrote: Marco Pessotto writes: I'm attaching the original file and image. Let me know if you want me to try to bisect it until I get a minimal file (which could take a while). The second (different) crash happens with this other (much shorter) file. Pleas

Re: [NTG-context] Testing TeX Live 2012

2012-05-22 Thread Taco Hoekwater
On 05/21/2012 09:22 PM, Marco Pessotto wrote: Marco Pessotto writes: Checked out, compiled and tested. And it works (of course :-). I spoke too early. I have at least three issues with images. Thanks, I am on it. But I will need source files and images, if at all possible. Backtraces are

Re: [NTG-context] Testing TeX Live 2012

2012-05-21 Thread Henning Hraban Ramm
Am 2012-05-21 um 21:22 schrieb Marco Pessotto: First case: failing, but no crash. % minimal \starttext \externalfigure[cow] \stoptext % stop Did you try to set a size like \externalfigure[cow][width=\textwidth] ? It’s still a bug, but that works for me (setting the size in \setupexternalfig

Re: [NTG-context] Testing TeX Live 2012

2012-05-21 Thread Marco Pessotto
Marco Pessotto writes: > Checked out, compiled and tested. And it works (of course :-). I spoke too early. I have at least three issues with images. First case: failing, but no crash. % minimal \starttext \externalfigure[cow] \stoptext % stop The second and the third case are under the foll

Re: [NTG-context] Testing TeX Live 2012

2012-05-21 Thread Marco Pessotto
Taco Hoekwater writes: > On 05/18/2012 08:20 PM, Marco Pessotto wrote: >> Mojca Miklavec writes: >> >>> You can try to checkout revision 26300 from TeX Live repository. That >>> should give you a good reference. >>> http://tug.org/svn/texlive?view=revision&revision=26301 >>> [...] >>> If yo

Re: [NTG-context] Testing TeX Live 2012

2012-05-21 Thread Taco Hoekwater
On 05/18/2012 08:20 PM, Marco Pessotto wrote: Mojca Miklavec writes: You can try to checkout revision 26300 from TeX Live repository. That should give you a good reference. http://tug.org/svn/texlive?view=revision&revision=26301 [...] If you could also try to build revision 26300 with deb

Re: [NTG-context] Testing TeX Live 2012

2012-05-18 Thread Marco Pessotto
Mojca Miklavec writes: > You can try to checkout revision 26300 from TeX Live repository. That > should give you a good reference. > http://tug.org/svn/texlive?view=revision&revision=26301 > [...] > If you could also try to build revision 26300 with debugging symbols > (and possibly try to up

Re: [NTG-context] Testing TeX Live 2012

2012-05-18 Thread Mojca Miklavec
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 6:56 PM, Marco Pessotto wrote: > Taco Hoekwater writes: > >> I guessed as much. Unfortunately, as I cannot reproduce the bug, this is >> where it ends for me. Perhaps Hartmut has a 32-bit system somewhere (CC). >> >> Best wishes, >> Taco >> >> PS Hartmut: full thread is her

Re: [NTG-context] Testing TeX Live 2012

2012-05-18 Thread Marco Pessotto
Taco Hoekwater writes: > I guessed as much. Unfortunately, as I cannot reproduce the bug, this is > where it ends for me. Perhaps Hartmut has a 32-bit system somewhere (CC). > > Best wishes, > Taco > > PS Hartmut: full thread is here: > http://archive.contextgarden.net/message/20120516.012657.49e

Re: [NTG-context] Testing TeX Live 2012

2012-05-18 Thread Taco Hoekwater
On 05/18/2012 02:49 PM, Marco Pessotto wrote: Taco Hoekwater writes: On 05/17/2012 07:31 PM, Marco Pessotto wrote: Anyway, I think I got the backtrace: Nice backtrace. You could try to print these in the debugger (gdb) p static_pdf (gdb) p static_pdf->posstruct (gdb) p *static_p

Re: [NTG-context] Testing TeX Live 2012

2012-05-18 Thread Marco Pessotto
Taco Hoekwater writes: > On 05/17/2012 07:31 PM, Marco Pessotto wrote: >> >> Anyway, I think I got the backtrace: > > Nice backtrace. > > You could try to print these in the debugger > > (gdb) p static_pdf > (gdb) p static_pdf->posstruct > (gdb) p *static_pdf->posstruct > > you should get s

Re: [NTG-context] Testing TeX Live 2012

2012-05-18 Thread Taco Hoekwater
On 05/17/2012 07:31 PM, Marco Pessotto wrote: Anyway, I think I got the backtrace: Nice backtrace. Starting program: /media/data/melmoth/progetti/texlive2012/bin/i386-linux/luatex --fmt="/media/data/melmoth/progetti/texlive2012/texmf-var/luatex-cache/context/2448223e6631addb83df348d74153606

Re: [NTG-context] Testing TeX Live 2012

2012-05-17 Thread luigi scarso
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 7:01 PM, luigi scarso wrote: > On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 6:25 PM, Marco Pessotto wrote: >> Mojca Miklavec writes: >> >>> (But that luatex is probably stripped.) >> >> So the next question is: how can I build luatex from those sources with >> the debug symbols? > Try > build

Re: [NTG-context] Testing TeX Live 2012

2012-05-17 Thread Marco Pessotto
Mojca Miklavec writes: > On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 6:25 PM, Marco Pessotto wrote: >> The following message is a courtesy copy of an article >> that has been posted to gmane.comp.tex.context as well. Gmane today hates me... >> Mojca Miklavec writes: >> >>> (But that luatex is probably stripped.

Re: [NTG-context] Testing TeX Live 2012

2012-05-17 Thread luigi scarso
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 6:25 PM, Marco Pessotto wrote: > Mojca Miklavec writes: > >> (But that luatex is probably stripped.) > > So the next question is: how can I build luatex from those sources with > the debug symbols? Try build.sh --nostrip BTW last revision is ok # context test.tex mtx-

Re: [NTG-context] Testing TeX Live 2012

2012-05-17 Thread Marco Pessotto
Mojca Miklavec writes: > (But that luatex is probably stripped.) So the next question is: how can I build luatex from those sources with the debug symbols? -- Marco ___ If your question is of interest to others a

Re: [NTG-context] Testing TeX Live 2012

2012-05-17 Thread luigi scarso
same problem here with latest tl2012-pretest # context test mtx-context | run 1: luatex --fmt="/media/LaCie/opt/luatex/texlive/2012/texmf-var/luatex-cache/context/2448223e6631addb83df348d74153606/formats/cont-en" --lua="/media/LaCie/opt/luatex/texlive/2012/texmf-var/luatex-cache/context/24482

Re: [NTG-context] Testing TeX Live 2012

2012-05-17 Thread Marco Pessotto
Mojca Miklavec writes: > On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 2:37 PM, Marco Pessotto wrote: >> Hans Hagen writes: >> >>> On 16-5-2012 21:02, Marco Pessotto wrote: >>> mtx-context | fatal error: no return code, message: luatex: execution interrupted[21:00] >>> >>> looks like a crashing luatex >> >>

Re: [NTG-context] Testing TeX Live 2012

2012-05-17 Thread Mojca Miklavec
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 2:37 PM, Marco Pessotto wrote: > Hans Hagen writes: > >> On 16-5-2012 21:02, Marco Pessotto wrote: >> >>> mtx-context | fatal error: no return code, message: luatex: execution >>> interrupted[21:00] >> >> looks like a crashing luatex > > I forgot to report the architecture

Re: [NTG-context] Testing TeX Live 2012

2012-05-17 Thread Mojca Miklavec
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 2:00 PM, Hans Hagen wrote: > On 16-5-2012 21:02, Marco Pessotto wrote: > >> mtx-context     | fatal error: no return code, message: luatex: execution >> interrupted[21:00] > > > looks like a crashing luatex The weird part is that it works the first time and only the second

Re: [NTG-context] Testing TeX Live 2012

2012-05-17 Thread Marco Pessotto
Hans Hagen writes: > On 16-5-2012 21:02, Marco Pessotto wrote: > >> mtx-context | fatal error: no return code, message: luatex: execution >> interrupted[21:00] > > looks like a crashing luatex I forgot to report the architecture and the platform, which is Gnu/Linux i386, Debian stable. If you s

Re: [NTG-context] Testing TeX Live 2012

2012-05-17 Thread Hans Hagen
On 16-5-2012 21:02, Marco Pessotto wrote: mtx-context | fatal error: no return code, message: luatex: execution interrupted[21:00] looks like a crashing luatex - Hans Hagen | PRAGMA

Re: [NTG-context] Testing TeX Live 2012

2012-05-17 Thread Marco Pessotto
Mojca Miklavec writes: > Dear ConTeXt users, > > TeX Live 2012 is going to be released soon. After the first successful > year of ConTeXt in TeX Live, it would be great to get enough testers > before the release (to make sure that it works flawlessly) and to get > rid of as many bugs as possible.