Hi Aditya,
I have rudimentary support for titled theorems and end of proof
markers working. It also takes care of your bug-report.
That's great news! My fingers are itching to test it ;-)
I have patched core-des so that stopper is also honored when number=no
is set.
Does this mean that
On Tue, 6 Mar 2007, Oliver Buerschaper wrote:
Hi Aditya,
I have rudimentary support for titled theorems and end of proof
markers working. It also takes care of your bug-report.
That's great news! My fingers are itching to test it ;-)
I have patched core-des so that stopper is also honored
Hi Oliver,
On Mon, 29 Jan 2007, Oliver Buerschaper wrote:
Hi Aditya, hi Taco,
I would really love to see built-in support for theorems in ConTeXt!
I have rudimentary support for titled theorems and end of proof
markers working. It also takes care of your bug-report.
I have been
On Fri, 19 Jan 2007, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
Aditya Mahajan wrote:
4. The theorem should have a title. The title should be optional.
Is partially implemented
I used to work around that by defining a layer on top of the
enumerations that always define the enumeration's settings
on the fly.
Hi Aditya, hi Taco,
I would really love to see built-in support for theorems in ConTeXt!
I have been typesetting my diploma thesis (in mathematical physics)
with ConTeXt and my experience has been that in some areas ConTeXt
still needs to catch up a bit on LaTeX (especially on the AMS
On Mon, 29 Jan 2007, Oliver Buerschaper wrote:
Hi Aditya, hi Taco,
I would really love to see built-in support for theorems in ConTeXt!
I have been typesetting my diploma thesis (in mathematical physics)
with ConTeXt and my experience has been that in some areas ConTeXt
still needs to
Hi Aditya,
Aditya Mahajan wrote:
4. The theorem should have a title. The title should be optional.
Is partially implemented
I used to work around that by defining a layer on top of the
enumerations that always define the enumeration's settings
on the fly. Quite inefficient, but it worked
On Fri, 19 Jan 2007, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
Hi Aditya,
Aditya Mahajan wrote:
4. The theorem should have a title. The title should be optional.
Is partially implemented
I used to work around that by defining a layer on top of the
enumerations that always define the enumeration's
