On 5/18/06, Taco Hoekwater <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > What about a new pdftex primitive: \pdfimagepixel, which would force
> > using a unit. Then the above would be done by \pdfimagepixel=1bp
>
> You can (as always) propose it on the pdftex list, but i personally
> do not see the point. Bear i
Sanjoy Mahajan wrote:
>>>{\pdfimageresolution=72 \externalfigure[ch01dia1.png]}
>
>>when you set pdfimageresolution there isn't any unit either, the
>>unit is implicit
It is defined to be an integer number of pixels per inch, in the
pdftex manual.
> What about a new pdftex primitive: \pdfimagepi
>> {\pdfimageresolution=72 \externalfigure[ch01dia1.png]}
> when you set pdfimageresolution there isn't any unit either, the
> unit is implicit
What about a new pdftex primitive: \pdfimagepixel, which would force
using a unit. Then the above would be done by \pdfimagepixel=1bp
This subject is d
On Thu, 18 May 2006 17:28:42 +0200, Taco Hoekwater <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> nico wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I have some troubles with a PNG image, that is not correctly rendered by
>> context (too small). The difference I've found with another correctly
>> displayed image is that the file does n
nico wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have some troubles with a PNG image, that is not correctly rendered by
> context (too small). The difference I've found with another correctly
> displayed image is that the file does not contain any resolution unit (but
> a pixels/inch default seems reasonable).
