On 2-12-2010 5:02, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 7:58 AM, Hans Hagenpra...@wxs.nl wrote:
I could probably support
\definecolor[xxx][0.5(red,green)]
\definecolor[xxx][0.5(red)]
which looks better than this ! and is less likely to conflict with names as
abc! is a rather value
On Thu, 2 Dec 2010, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 2-12-2010 5:02, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 7:58 AM, Hans Hagenpra...@wxs.nl wrote:
I could probably support
\definecolor[xxx][0.5(red,green)]
\definecolor[xxx][0.5(red)]
which looks better than this ! and is less likely to conflict
On 2-12-2010 12:01, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
Indeed. That is what I meant. I did not know that the metapost like
syntax worked for \colored.
\colored is just a shortcut to \definecolor
-
On 2-12-2010 8:19, Alan BRASLAU wrote:
The next step would be to allow \color[0.5[red,green]] (or
\color[0.5(red,green)]), i.e. such syntax wherever a color can be used.
You can use \definecolor[mycolor][.5(red,green)] in the current beta,
but I wonder if \color[0.5(red,green)] makes much
On Sat, 2010-11-27 at 14:25 +0100, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 27-11-2010 2:16, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 13:29, Hans Hagen wrote:
\starttikzpicture
\node[circle,ball color=darkred] (a) at (0,0,0) {$p_x$};
\stoptikzpicture
I made a workaround in that way, but it's
On 1-12-2010 1:36, Michael Murphy wrote:
On Sat, 2010-11-27 at 14:25 +0100, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 27-11-2010 2:16, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 13:29, Hans Hagen wrote:
\starttikzpicture
\node[circle,ball color=darkred] (a) at (0,0,0) {$p_x$};
\stoptikzpicture
I made a
I'm pretty sure that I never implemented something using a questionmark.
However, we do have:
\definecolor[red-t] [r=1,t=0.5,a=1]
\definecolor[green-t][g=1,t=0.5,a=1]
\defineintermediatecolor[mycolora][0.5,red,green]
\defineintermediatecolor[mycolorb][0.5,red-t,green-t]
\starttext
Am 01.12.2010 um 18:37 schrieb Michael Murphy:
OK, thanks. Last question then: is there a way to redefine standard
colors? Something like:
\redefinecolor[red][r=0,g=1,b=0]
\starttext
\definecolor[test][r=1]\color[test]{red?}
\definecolor[test][g=1]\color[test]{red?}
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 7:58 AM, Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl wrote:
I could probably support
\definecolor[xxx][0.5(red,green)]
\definecolor[xxx][0.5(red)]
which looks better than this ! and is less likely to conflict with names as
abc! is a rather value color name.
That will be a nice feature
On Wednesday 01 December 2010 13:58:23 Hans Hagen wrote:
I could probably support
\definecolor[xxx][0.5(red,green)]
\definecolor[xxx][0.5(red)]
which looks better than this ! and is less likely to conflict with names
as abc! is a rather value color name.
Indeed, a favorite color is
2010/11/26 Mojca Miklavec mojca.miklavec.li...@gmail.com
Dear Till/Christian/Hans,
The following is broken in ConTeXt MKIV (assuming the usage of patched
TikZ to allow running it under MKIV at all), but works fine in ConTeXt
MKII:
\usemodule[tikz]
\starttext
\starttikzpicture
On 27-11-2010 12:04, Vedran Miletić wrote:
2010/11/26 Mojca Miklavecmojca.miklavec.li...@gmail.com
Dear Till/Christian/Hans,
The following is broken in ConTeXt MKIV (assuming the usage of patched
TikZ to allow running it under MKIV at all), but works fine in ConTeXt
MKII:
\usemodule[tikz]
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 13:29, Hans Hagen wrote:
\starttikzpicture
\node[circle,ball color=darkred] (a) at (0,0,0) {$p_x$};
\stoptikzpicture
I made a workaround in that way, but it's still a bug ...
Mojca
___
On 27-11-2010 2:16, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 13:29, Hans Hagen wrote:
\starttikzpicture
\node[circle,ball color=darkred] (a) at (0,0,0) {$p_x$};
\stoptikzpicture
I made a workaround in that way, but it's still a bug ...
I have no clue what the ! does apart from
14 matches
Mail list logo
