Vladimir, I am not sure that the settings are incorrect. Why does it
work with MKII then? Also it worked with MKIV before. It broke only
recently.
Can someone please throw light on this? Is the disapperance of the
numbers, as Vladimir suggests, expected behavior of the minimal
example in MKIV.
Am 05.01.2010 um 14:22 schrieb Curiouslearn:
Vladimir, I am not sure that the settings are incorrect. Why does it
work with MKII then? Also it worked with MKIV before. It broke only
recently.
Add 'headalign=flushright'.
Wolfgang
Thanks! That worked great.
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 8:52 AM, Wolfgang Schuster
schuster.wolfg...@googlemail.com wrote:
Am 05.01.2010 um 14:22 schrieb Curiouslearn:
Vladimir, I am not sure that the settings are incorrect. Why does it
work with MKII then? Also it worked with MKIV before. It
Hello.
2010/1/5 Curiouslearn curiousle...@gmail.com:
Vladimir, I am not sure that the settings are incorrect. Why does it
work with MKII then? Also it worked with MKIV before. It broke only
recently.
Sorry, I didn't try to check texexec (MKII) also I just checked context (MKIV).
Can someone
Am 05.01.2010 um 14:56 schrieb Vladimir Lomov:
Vladimir, I am not sure that the settings are incorrect. Why does it
work with MKII then? Also it worked with MKIV before. It broke only
recently.
Add 'headalign=flushright'.
Hm, this gives more unpleasant result for MKIV format but reveals
Hi.
2010/1/5 Wolfgang Schuster schuster.wolfg...@googlemail.com:
Am 05.01.2010 um 14:56 schrieb Vladimir Lomov:
Vladimir, I am not sure that the settings are incorrect. Why does it
work with MKII then? Also it worked with MKIV before. It broke only
recently.
Add 'headalign=flushright'.
Hi.
I'm newbie with ConTeXt but have experience with LaTeX.
2010/1/5 Curiouslearn curiousle...@gmail.com:
Minimal example
\setuppapersize[letter][letter]
\starttext
\defineenumeration[problem][text= ,location=inleft]
\setupenumerations[problem][stopper=)]
\problem
problem 1
\problem
