Re: [NTG-context] has the bidi mechanism been changed?
On 12/14/2015 10:02 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
On 12/11/2015 03:50 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 12/11/2015 10:21 AM, tala...@fastmail.fm wrote:
Has the bidi mechanism (method=one, or method=two, etc.) been changed or
redefined? My RTL brackets and numbers are being inverted. As of the
beta operative in September 2015, these were working.
In the present beta, it reads:
While it should read (notice the ordering of the numbers as well as the
direction of the parentheses):
there is a rtl bug in 0.85 which is fixed in upcoming 0.86
Hans,
I wonder whether this is a related issue to this bug:
\setupinteraction[state=start]
\setupreferencing[left=, right=, interaction=all]
\setupdirections[bidi=on,method=two]
\starttext
\section[sectionone]{Section one}
No text after the first line:\\\about[sectionone]
Misplaced text
\stoptext
Text after \about is misplaced at bottom left only if the reference text
starts a line.
It works fine with stable from 2015.05.18 12:26 (and beta from
2015.09.13 13:31). It works wrong with latest beta from 2015.11.19 19:13.
yes and that is fixed in the next version
Hans
-
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
| www.pragma-pod.nl
-
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___
Re: [NTG-context] has the bidi mechanism been changed?
On 12/11/2015 03:50 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
> On 12/11/2015 10:21 AM, tala...@fastmail.fm wrote:
>> Has the bidi mechanism (method=one, or method=two, etc.) been changed or
>> redefined? My RTL brackets and numbers are being inverted. As of the
>> beta operative in September 2015, these were working.
>>
>> In the present beta, it reads:
>>
>> While it should read (notice the ordering of the numbers as well as the
>> direction of the parentheses):
>
> there is a rtl bug in 0.85 which is fixed in upcoming 0.86
Hans,
I wonder whether this is a related issue to this bug:
\setupinteraction[state=start]
\setupreferencing[left=, right=, interaction=all]
\setupdirections[bidi=on,method=two]
\starttext
\section[sectionone]{Section one}
No text after the first line:\\\about[sectionone]
Misplaced text
\stoptext
Text after \about is misplaced at bottom left only if the reference text
starts a line.
It works fine with stable from 2015.05.18 12:26 (and beta from
2015.09.13 13:31). It works wrong with latest beta from 2015.11.19 19:13.
Many thanks for your help,
Pablo
--
http://www.ousia.tk
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___
Re: [NTG-context] has the bidi mechanism been changed?
On 12/11/2015 10:21 AM, tala...@fastmail.fm wrote: Has the bidi mechanism (method=one, or method=two, etc.) been changed or redefined? My RTL brackets and numbers are being inverted. As of the beta operative in September 2015, these were working. In the present beta, it reads: While it should read (notice the ordering of the numbers as well as the direction of the parentheses): there is a rtl bug in 0.85 which is fixed in upcoming 0.86 Hans - Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl - ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
