Re: [NTG-context] Itemize lists run into floats - how to add additional spacing

2018-12-19 Thread Marco Patzer
On Wed, 19 Dec 2018 18:29:33 +0100 Hans Hagen wrote: > \setupfloat >[figure] >[default=left,margin=1cm] Thanks for the eye-opener. I realised I applied the margin on the item group instead of the float. Sometimes it's the simple things… Marco

Re: [NTG-context] Itemize lists run into floats - how to add additional spacing

2018-12-19 Thread Hans Hagen
On 12/19/2018 1:15 PM, Marco Patzer wrote: Hi! The bullet of itemize lists runs into the boxes and caption of floats. How to add spacing so the bullet doesn't touch the float? Example: \setupexternalfigures [location=default] \setupfloat [figure] [default=left] \setupitemize

Re: [NTG-context] Itemize and natural tables

2018-09-25 Thread Wolfgang Schuster
Jan Willem Flamma schrieb am 24.09.18 um 08:48: Thank you, also for the follow up in reporting the bug. I have playing around with \item at various positions but hadn’t considered using \itemtag. As a more general question: My understanding is that in a tabulate environment \NI is short for

Re: [NTG-context] Itemize and natural tables

2018-09-24 Thread Jan Willem Flamma
Thank you, also for the follow up in reporting the bug. I have playing around with \item at various positions but hadn’t considered using \itemtag. As a more general question: My understanding is that in a tabulate environment \NI is short for \NC \itemtag \NC Is that the case as well in a

Re: [NTG-context] Itemize and natural tables

2018-09-23 Thread Wolfgang Schuster
You would use the \itemtag command in the same way as you would do it with tabulate \starttext \startitemize[n] \bTABLE     \bTR         \bTD (\itemtag) Item 1 \eTD     \eTR \eTABLE \stopitemize \stoptext but there is a bug which prevents the item counter to appear in the output (which I

Re: [NTG-context] \itemize unpacked?

2016-12-19 Thread Ulrike Fischer
Am Mon, 19 Dec 2016 14:26:12 +0100 schrieb Procházka Lukáš Ing.: > Hello, > > yes, that's right; but I thought there is an option to "override" the > default/set-up setting - > > - what should "unpacked" do otherwise? Imho while you can use packed locally unpacked is only for global settings.

Re: [NTG-context] \itemize unpacked?

2016-12-19 Thread Thomas A. Schmitz
On 12/19/2016 02:26 PM, Procházka Lukáš Ing. wrote: Also, in my case, there are more \itemize to be packed; and some of them (in the middle of the document) should be "unpacked"; so grouping itemize setting is not very comfortable here. Then the cleanest (and most ConTeXt-like) solution would

Re: [NTG-context] \itemize unpacked?

2016-12-19 Thread Procházka Lukáš Ing .
Hello, yes, that's right; but I thought there is an option to "override" the default/set-up setting - - what should "unpacked" do otherwise? Also, in my case, there are more \itemize to be packed; and some of them (in the middle of the document) should be "unpacked"; so grouping itemize

Re: [NTG-context] \itemize unpacked?

2016-12-19 Thread Herbert Voss
Am 19.12.2016 um 13:26 schrieb Procházka Lukáš Ing.: Hello, I have code that setups \itemize packed. Is it possible to force "unpacked" option back (mentioned here: http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Command/setupitemgroup)? \starttext \startitemize[][] \item 1a \item 1b

Re: [NTG-context] itemize columns transposed

2016-10-11 Thread Mikael P. Sundqvist
On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 11:37 AM, Wolfgang Schuster wrote: > Mikael P. Sundqvist > 11. Oktober 2016 um 11:21 > > Thank you, the notjoinedup works well, but I cannot see any difference > using any of the keys unpacked or notpacked. > > Is there any chance to have the

Re: [NTG-context] itemize columns transposed

2016-10-11 Thread Wolfgang Schuster
Mikael P. Sundqvist 11. Oktober 2016 um 11:21 Thank you, the notjoinedup works well, but I cannot see any difference using any of the keys unpacked or notpacked. Is there any chance to have the before, after and inbetween keys to set the space manually? The before

Re: [NTG-context] itemize columns transposed

2016-10-11 Thread Mikael P. Sundqvist
On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 10:28 AM, Hans Hagen wrote: > On 10/10/2016 10:24 AM, Hans Hagen wrote: > >> \setvalue{\??itemgroupkeyword\v!notpacked}% > > > we already have unpacked > > > - >

Re: [NTG-context] itemize columns transposed

2016-10-10 Thread Hans Hagen
On 10/10/2016 10:24 AM, Hans Hagen wrote: \setvalue{\??itemgroupkeyword\v!notpacked}% we already have unpacked - Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt |

Re: [NTG-context] itemize columns transposed

2016-10-10 Thread Hans Hagen
On 10/2/2016 8:08 PM, Mikael P. Sundqvist wrote: \starttext Some text before. \startitemize[a,horizontal,three][before={\blank[big]},after={\blank[big]}] \startitem $\int_0^2 1+2x\,dx$ \stopitem \startitem $\int_0^{\ln 2} e^s\,ds$ \stopitem \startitem $\int_0^{\ln 2} e^{2s}\,ds$ \stopitem

Re: [NTG-context] itemize columns transposed

2016-10-02 Thread Mikael P. Sundqvist
On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 8:44 AM, Mikael P. Sundqvist wrote: > On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 8:27 AM, Mikael P. Sundqvist wrote: >> On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 11:07 PM, Aditya Mahajan wrote: >>> On Sat, 17 Sep 2016, Mikael P. Sundqvist wrote:

Re: [NTG-context] itemize columns transposed

2016-09-22 Thread Mikael P. Sundqvist
On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 8:27 AM, Mikael P. Sundqvist wrote: > On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 11:07 PM, Aditya Mahajan wrote: >> On Sat, 17 Sep 2016, Mikael P. Sundqvist wrote: >>> >>> >>> Is there a reason why the above does not work using \item, like >>> >>>

Re: [NTG-context] itemize columns transposed

2016-09-18 Thread Mikael P. Sundqvist
On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 11:07 PM, Aditya Mahajan wrote: > On Sat, 17 Sep 2016, Mikael P. Sundqvist wrote: >> >> >> Is there a reason why the above does not work using \item, like >> >> \startitemize[a,horizontal,three] >> \item $\int_0^2 1+2x\,dx$ >> \item $\int_0^{\ln 2}

Re: [NTG-context] itemize columns transposed

2016-09-17 Thread Aditya Mahajan
On Sat, 17 Sep 2016, Mikael P. Sundqvist wrote: Is there a reason why the above does not work using \item, like \startitemize[a,horizontal,three] \item $\int_0^2 1+2x\,dx$ \item $\int_0^{\ln 2} e^s\,ds$ \item $\int_0^{\ln 2} e^{2s}\,ds$ \item $\int_0^{\pi} \sin t\,dt$ \item $\int_0^{2\pi}\sin

Re: [NTG-context] itemize columns transposed

2016-09-17 Thread Mikael P. Sundqvist
On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 2:12 PM, Mikael P. Sundqvist wrote: > On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 1:51 PM, Wolfgang Schuster > wrote: >> Mikael P. Sundqvist >> 17. September 2016 um 08:14 >> Hi! >> >> I wonder if it is possible to automatically have the itemize

Re: [NTG-context] itemize columns transposed

2016-09-17 Thread Mikael P. Sundqvist
On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 1:51 PM, Wolfgang Schuster wrote: > Mikael P. Sundqvist > 17. September 2016 um 08:14 > Hi! > > I wonder if it is possible to automatically have the itemize in > columns and have the order changed (in effect, the whole itemization > should be

Re: [NTG-context] itemize columns transposed

2016-09-17 Thread Wolfgang Schuster
Mikael P. Sundqvist 17. September 2016 um 08:14 Hi! I wonder if it is possible to automatically have the itemize in columns and have the order changed (in effect, the whole itemization should be transposed) so that one gets a b c d e f instead of a c e b d f With

Re: [NTG-context] itemize[n] and dejavu fonts

2015-04-07 Thread Wolfgang Schuster
Am 07.04.2015 um 11:14 schrieb Alan BRASLAU alan.bras...@cea.fr: The list spacing parameters (fit) is not right for numbered itemizations when using the dejavu fonts. MWE: \setupbodyfont [dejavu,10pt] \starttext \startitemize [n] \dorecurse{10}{\startitem X\stopitem} \stoptext

Re: [NTG-context] itemize[n] and dejavu fonts

2015-04-07 Thread Alan BRASLAU
On Tue, 7 Apr 2015 11:46:06 +0200 Wolfgang Schuster schuster.wolfg...@gmail.com wrote: MWE: \setupbodyfont [dejavu,10pt] \starttext \startitemize [n] \dorecurse{10}{\startitem X\stopitem} \stoptext (switching to 100 items is even worse!) You missed the \stopitemize after

Re: [NTG-context] itemize[n] and dejavu fonts

2015-04-07 Thread Wolfgang Schuster
Am 07.04.2015 um 12:29 schrieb Alan BRASLAU alan.bras...@cea.fr: On Tue, 7 Apr 2015 11:46:06 +0200 Wolfgang Schuster schuster.wolfg...@gmail.com wrote: MWE: \setupbodyfont [dejavu,10pt] \starttext \startitemize [n] \dorecurse{10}{\startitem X\stopitem} \stoptext (switching to

Re: [NTG-context] itemize[n] and dejavu fonts

2015-04-07 Thread Alan BRASLAU
On Tue, 7 Apr 2015 12:39:08 +0200 Wolfgang Schuster schuster.wolfg...@gmail.com wrote: Am 07.04.2015 um 12:29 schrieb Alan BRASLAU alan.bras...@cea.fr: On Tue, 7 Apr 2015 11:46:06 +0200 Wolfgang Schuster schuster.wolfg...@gmail.com wrote: MWE: \setupbodyfont [dejavu,10pt]

Re: [NTG-context] itemize[n] and dejavu fonts

2015-04-07 Thread Wolfgang Schuster
Am 07.04.2015 um 13:31 schrieb Alan BRASLAU alan.bras...@cea.fr: On Tue, 7 Apr 2015 12:39:08 +0200 Wolfgang Schuster schuster.wolfg...@gmail.com mailto:schuster.wolfg...@gmail.com wrote: Am 07.04.2015 um 12:29 schrieb Alan BRASLAU alan.bras...@cea.fr: On Tue, 7 Apr 2015 11:46:06

Re: [NTG-context] itemize[n] and dejavu fonts

2015-04-07 Thread Alan BRASLAU
On Tue, 7 Apr 2015 13:37:54 +0200 Wolfgang Schuster schuster.wolfg...@gmail.com wrote: Can you show your output from the example and tell what you expect from the fit option. For example: \setupbodyfont [scola,10pt] \startitemize [n] ... yields a reasonable output: 10. X \setupbodyfont

Re: [NTG-context] Itemize and framed

2014-08-29 Thread Otared Kavian
Hi, It looks fine, but you can as well use \startframedtext, as in: \starttext \definecolor[H1prime][c=0.50, m=0.00, y=1.00, k=0.00] \definecolor[H4][c=0.07, m=0.00, y=0.15, k=0.00] \starttext \startframedtext[ width=\textwidth, corner=06, frame=on,

Re: [NTG-context] Itemize and framed

2014-08-29 Thread Wolfgang Schuster
Am 29.08.2014 um 15:55 schrieb Otared Kavian ota...@gmail.com: Hi, It looks fine, but you can as well use \startframedtext, as in: \starttext \definecolor[H1prime][c=0.50, m=0.00, y=1.00, k=0.00] \definecolor[H4][c=0.07, m=0.00, y=0.15, k=0.00] \starttext \startframedtext[

Re: [NTG-context] Itemize and framed

2014-08-29 Thread Fabrice
Thank you for your answers, I continue to learn. However, the solution should Otared me better because the numbering is less near the edge of the frame. ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please

Re: [NTG-context] Itemize and framed

2014-08-29 Thread Otared Kavian
Hi Fabrice, Actually with both solutions you can control the distance of the framed material to the frame by the key « offset=SomeMeasure » For instance you can say: \startframedtext[ width=\textwidth, offset=.5em, corner=06, frame=on,

Re: [NTG-context] itemize: how to get the first level items indented?

2014-08-20 Thread Gerben Wierda
On 20 Aug 2014, at 01:22, Aditya Mahajan adit...@umich.edu wrote: On Wed, 20 Aug 2014, Gerben Wierda wrote: On 19 Aug 2014, at 16:33, Wolfgang Schuster schuster.wolfg...@gmail.com wrote: Am 19.08.2014 um 16:27 schrieb Gerben Wierda gerben.wie...@rna.nl: I’d like to get

Re: [NTG-context] itemize: how to get the first level items indented?

2014-08-20 Thread Wolfgang Schuster
Am 20.08.2014 um 16:07 schrieb Gerben Wierda gerben.wie...@rna.nl: Thanks. I used \setupitemize[each][margin=standard] and this works. However, I've noticed that the normal pararaph indent is just a little bit more than the itemize margin. The bullets of the list are not aligned

Re: [NTG-context] itemize: how to get the first level items indented?

2014-08-20 Thread Gerben Wierda
On 20 Aug 2014, at 17:23, Wolfgang Schuster schuster.wolfg...@gmail.com wrote: Am 20.08.2014 um 16:07 schrieb Gerben Wierda gerben.wie...@rna.nl: Thanks. I used \setupitemize[each][margin=standard] and this works. However, I've noticed that the normal pararaph indent is just a

Re: [NTG-context] itemize: how to get the first level items indented?

2014-08-20 Thread Wolfgang Schuster
Am 20.08.2014 um 17:32 schrieb Gerben Wierda gerben.wie...@rna.nl: On 20 Aug 2014, at 17:23, Wolfgang Schuster schuster.wolfg...@gmail.com wrote: Am 20.08.2014 um 16:07 schrieb Gerben Wierda gerben.wie...@rna.nl: Thanks. I used \setupitemize[each][margin=standard] and this

Re: [NTG-context] itemize: how to get the first level items indented?

2014-08-20 Thread Gerben Wierda
On 20 Aug 2014, at 17:34, Wolfgang Schuster schuster.wolfg...@gmail.com wrote: Am 20.08.2014 um 17:32 schrieb Gerben Wierda gerben.wie...@rna.nl: On 20 Aug 2014, at 17:23, Wolfgang Schuster schuster.wolfg...@gmail.com wrote: Am 20.08.2014 um 16:07 schrieb Gerben Wierda

Re: [NTG-context] itemize: how to get the first level items indented?

2014-08-20 Thread Wolfgang Schuster
Am 20.08.2014 um 17:53 schrieb Gerben Wierda gerben.wie...@rna.nl: On 20 Aug 2014, at 17:34, Wolfgang Schuster schuster.wolfg...@gmail.com wrote: Am 20.08.2014 um 17:32 schrieb Gerben Wierda gerben.wie...@rna.nl: On 20 Aug 2014, at 17:23, Wolfgang Schuster

Re: [NTG-context] itemize: how to get the first level items indented?

2014-08-20 Thread Gerben Wierda
On 20 Aug 2014, at 18:01, Wolfgang Schuster schuster.wolfg...@gmail.com wrote: Am 20.08.2014 um 17:53 schrieb Gerben Wierda gerben.wie...@rna.nl: On 20 Aug 2014, at 17:34, Wolfgang Schuster schuster.wolfg...@gmail.com wrote: Am 20.08.2014 um 17:32 schrieb Gerben Wierda

Re: [NTG-context] itemize: how to get the first level items indented?

2014-08-20 Thread Wolfgang Schuster
Am 20.08.2014 um 19:01 schrieb Gerben Wierda gerben.wie...@rna.nl: Works ok at first level. Second level doesn't exactly align. But there is some startstopnarrower in play too. I'l try to create a minimal example. The narrower environment does also use font dependent values for the left and

Re: [NTG-context] itemize: how to get the first level items indented?

2014-08-19 Thread Wolfgang Schuster
Am 19.08.2014 um 16:27 schrieb Gerben Wierda gerben.wie...@rna.nl: I’d like to get \startitemize\stopitemize to indent the first level items already with the equal amount of indentation as the start of a paragraph (which is indented). Is there a way to do that? \setupindenting[yes,medium]

Re: [NTG-context] itemize: how to get the first level items indented?

2014-08-19 Thread Gerben Wierda
On 19 Aug 2014, at 16:33, Wolfgang Schuster schuster.wolfg...@gmail.com wrote: Am 19.08.2014 um 16:27 schrieb Gerben Wierda gerben.wie...@rna.nl: I’d like to get \startitemize\stopitemize to indent the first level items already with the equal amount of indentation as the start of a

Re: [NTG-context] itemize: how to get the first level items indented?

2014-08-19 Thread Aditya Mahajan
On Wed, 20 Aug 2014, Gerben Wierda wrote: On 19 Aug 2014, at 16:33, Wolfgang Schuster schuster.wolfg...@gmail.com wrote: Am 19.08.2014 um 16:27 schrieb Gerben Wierda gerben.wie...@rna.nl: I’d like to get \startitemize\stopitemize to indent the first level items already with the equal

Re: [NTG-context] itemize

2013-03-04 Thread Marco Patzer
On 2013–03–04 Meer, H. van der wrote: How does one forces the item nubers to the right. The goal is have the units above each other and not above the tens: Here's an ugly solution using a box. Maybe there's a more clean solution. \setupitemgroup [itemize]

Re: [NTG-context] itemize

2013-03-04 Thread Meer, H. van der
A lucky guess did me look into the code. Whereas I got no results with [align=] it turns out that [itemalign=flushright] does the trick. Spares you the ugly solution. Maybe someone more apt to do things in the contextgarden, will be so kind as put this there. Hans van der Meer On 4 mrt.

Re: [NTG-context] itemize

2013-03-04 Thread Marco Patzer
On 2013–03–04 Meer, H. van der wrote: A lucky guess did me look into the code. Whereas I got no results with [align=] it turns out that [itemalign=flushright] does the trick. Spares you the ugly solution. That's indeed much better :) Maybe someone more apt to do things in the contextgarden,

Re: [NTG-context] itemize behaviour

2012-07-05 Thread Wolfgang Schuster
Am 03.07.2012 um 21:43 schrieb Meer, H. van der: I do not understand the workings of the itemize. What I want is two nested itemlists. The outer one unpacked, the inner one packed. In the inner one the itemlist should be joinedup with the text before it. I do not get this working, see the

Re: [NTG-context] itemize behaviour

2012-07-05 Thread Meer, H. van der
Thanks. Is the [joinedup] deprecated? Or has it another use? Hans van der Meer On 5 jul. 2012, at 20:16, Wolfgang Schuster wrote: You need the “paragraph” option. \starttext \setupitemgroup[itemize][1][4,unpacked] \setupitemgroup[itemize][2][5,packed,paragraph]

Re: [NTG-context] itemize behaviour

2012-07-05 Thread Wolfgang Schuster
Am 05.07.2012 um 21:47 schrieb Meer, H. van der: Thanks. Is the [joinedup] deprecated? Or has it another use? The “joinedup” option works as intended, the problem in your example is that the inner itemgroup acts different for the first item. When you use ”joinedup” context ignores the

Re: [NTG-context] itemize in two columns and pagebreaks

2012-06-30 Thread Marcin Borkowski
Dnia 2012-06-30, o godz. 07:05:36 Otared Kavian ota...@gmail.com napisał(a): Hi, The mechanisms of columns in itemize (which I think is the same as startcolumns) and in simplecolumns are indeed different, as Hans indicated once. The issue you encountered is indeed a bug as you point out:

Re: [NTG-context] itemize in two columns and pagebreaks

2012-06-30 Thread Wolfgang Schuster
Am 29.06.2012 um 23:30 schrieb Marcin Borkowski: Hello, I encountered a weird problem with \startitemize[columns] Namely, sometimes ConTeXt (MkIV) puts a pagebreak before the itemization. I tried to distill the problem to a minimal example, until now without success, but I'll post a

Re: [NTG-context] itemize in two columns and pagebreaks

2012-06-29 Thread Marcin Borkowski
Dnia 2012-06-29, o godz. 23:30:13 Marcin Borkowski mb...@wmi.amu.edu.pl napisał(a): Hello, I encountered a weird problem with \startitemize[columns] Namely, sometimes ConTeXt (MkIV) puts a pagebreak before the itemization. I tried to distill the problem to a minimal example, until

Re: [NTG-context] itemize in two columns and pagebreaks

2012-06-29 Thread Otared Kavian
Hi Marcin, I tested your file and noticed the issue you are reporting. In your case you can use \startsimplecolumns to get rid of the page break (however there is a small problem with the distance between the text and the items): \startchapter[title={Nim-suma liczb całkowitych nieujemnych}]

Re: [NTG-context] itemize in two columns and pagebreaks

2012-06-29 Thread Marcin Borkowski
Dnia 2012-06-30, o godz. 05:05:31 Otared Kavian ota...@gmail.com napisał(a): Hi Marcin, I tested your file and noticed the issue you are reporting. In your case you can use \startsimplecolumns to get rid of the page break (however there is a small problem with the distance between the text

Re: [NTG-context] itemize in two columns and pagebreaks

2012-06-29 Thread Otared Kavian
Hi, The mechanisms of columns in itemize (which I think is the same as startcolumns) and in simplecolumns are indeed different, as Hans indicated once. The issue you encountered is indeed a bug as you point out: once (a few months ago) I had an analogous problem and Wolfgang S. suggested me to

Re: [NTG-context] Itemize without page break

2012-03-22 Thread Mojca Miklavec
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 03:01, Kip Warner wrote: On Tue, 2012-03-20 at 18:22 -0400, Aditya Mahajan wrote: Anything else will leave to undersirable behaviour (or segfaults :) ) As I had said in one of my earlier emails, this is the case for ALL context macros that take both options and

Re: [NTG-context] Itemize without page break

2012-03-22 Thread Hans Hagen
On 22-3-2012 11:38, Mojca Miklavec wrote: - The fact that assignments and simple options have to be separated is not a limitation of TeX, but the way how ConTeXt is programmed. Hans uses a single command that takes all options inside brackets at once that defines (results in) something similar

Re: [NTG-context] Itemize without page break

2012-03-22 Thread Hans Hagen
On 22-3-2012 11:38, Mojca Miklavec wrote: - The fact that assignments and simple options have to be separated is not a limitation of TeX, but the way how ConTeXt is programmed. Hans uses a single command that takes all options inside brackets at once that defines (results in) something similar

Re: [NTG-context] Itemize without page break

2012-03-22 Thread Philipp Gesang
On 2012-03-22 11:38, Mojca Miklavec wrote: On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 03:01, Kip Warner wrote: On Tue, 2012-03-20 at 18:22 -0400, Aditya Mahajan wrote: Anything else will leave to undersirable behaviour (or segfaults :) ) As I had said in one of my earlier emails, this is the case for ALL

Re: [NTG-context] Itemize without page break

2012-03-22 Thread Philipp Gesang
On 2012-03-22 12:21, Philipp Gesang wrote: Therefore the difference to Context deserves mention at least somewhere in http://wiki.contextgarden.net/From_LaTeX_to_ConTeXt which said migrators are most likely to consult first. Fyi I just added a couple words to the article:

Re: [NTG-context] Itemize without page break

2012-03-22 Thread luigi scarso
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 3:01 AM, Kip Warner k...@thevertigo.com wrote: What's probably happening is eventually the system runs out of memory, the swap gets depleted as well, and as a last act of desperation, the kernel finally denies an allocation request to luatex which is pretty rare. The

Re: [NTG-context] Itemize without page break

2012-03-22 Thread luigi scarso
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 1:05 PM, luigi scarso luigi.sca...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 3:01 AM, Kip Warner k...@thevertigo.com wrote: What's probably happening is eventually the system runs out of memory, the swap gets depleted as well, and as a last act of desperation, the kernel

Re: [NTG-context] Itemize without page break

2012-03-22 Thread Kip Warner
On Thu, 2012-03-22 at 11:38 +0100, Mojca Miklavec wrote: - Maybe it could be more explicit, but if you ever take a look at documentation Sorry, but which documentation should one obviously be looking at? The half a dozen PDFs, the several versions of the wiki, the mailing list, one of the

Re: [NTG-context] Itemize without page break

2012-03-22 Thread Kip Warner
On Thu, 2012-03-22 at 12:21 +0100, Philipp Gesang wrote: You’re right, it can cause confusion to people migrating from Latex where package options, afair, allows mixed key-value/list syntax (like e.g. Lua does as well). Random example from the KOMA-Script manual:

Re: [NTG-context] Itemize without page break

2012-03-22 Thread Kip Warner
On Thu, 2012-03-22 at 12:58 +0100, Philipp Gesang wrote: Fyi I just added a couple words to the article: http://wiki.contextgarden.net/From_LaTeX_to_ConTeXt#Optional_Arguments_and_Setups please expand as needed! Thank you. -- Kip Warner -- Software Engineer OpenPGP encrypted/signed mail

Re: [NTG-context] Itemize without page break

2012-03-21 Thread Kip Warner
On Tue, 2012-03-20 at 18:22 -0400, Aditya Mahajan wrote: Anything else will leave to undersirable behaviour (or segfaults :) ) As I had said in one of my earlier emails, this is the case for ALL context macros that take both options and assignments. Fair enough. I got it to work now with,

Re: [NTG-context] Itemize without page break

2012-03-20 Thread Hans Hagen
On 20-3-2012 01:43, Kip Warner wrote: On Mon, 2012-03-19 at 22:49 +0100, Hans Hagen wrote: On 19-3-2012 00:29, Kip Warner wrote: I've cc'd the luatex user mailing list since this is probably, I suppose, a luatex issue more than a ConTeXt one. not that probable Actually highly probably,

Re: [NTG-context] Itemize without page break

2012-03-20 Thread Hans Hagen
On 20-3-2012 06:49, Kip Warner wrote: On Tue, 2012-03-20 at 06:46 +0100, Wolfgang Schuster wrote: TeX has it’s problem with certain errors, accept it. It is not a problem with the program raising an error, it was how it went about doing it. It should not have to take down the entire operating

Re: [NTG-context] Itemize without page break

2012-03-20 Thread luigi scarso
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 9:17 AM, Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl wrote: On 20-3-2012 06:49, Kip Warner wrote: On Tue, 2012-03-20 at 06:46 +0100, Wolfgang Schuster wrote: TeX has it’s problem with certain errors, accept it. It is not a problem with the program raising an error, it was how it went

Re: [NTG-context] Itemize without page break

2012-03-20 Thread Kip Warner
On Tue, 2012-03-20 at 09:17 +0100, Hans Hagen wrote: which is not really a crash of my operating system; there is not much I can do about this issue I fear. Totally up to you. I just wanted to bring it to your attention. -- Kip Warner -- Software Engineer OpenPGP encrypted/signed mail

Re: [NTG-context] Itemize without page break

2012-03-20 Thread Kip Warner
On Tue, 2012-03-20 at 06:46 +0100, Wolfgang Schuster wrote: You can’t have a assignment in both parameters because this would lead to the same problem as before, combine both settings in one argument and it works. I must not be doing it right because the item numbers are gone now and replaced

Re: [NTG-context] Itemize without page break

2012-03-20 Thread Aditya Mahajan
On Tue, 20 Mar 2012, Kip Warner wrote: On Tue, 2012-03-20 at 06:46 +0100, Wolfgang Schuster wrote: You can’t have a assignment in both parameters because this would lead to the same problem as before, combine both settings in one argument and it works. I must not be doing it right because

Re: [NTG-context] Itemize without page break

2012-03-19 Thread Wolfgang Schuster
Am 19.03.2012 um 00:29 schrieb Kip Warner: On Sun, 2012-03-18 at 16:25 -0700, Kip Warner wrote: On Sat, 2012-03-17 at 11:21 +0100, Wolfgang Schuster wrote: Am 17.03.2012 um 10:21 schrieb luigi scarso: On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 2:47 AM, Kip Warner k...@thevertigo.com wrote: Hey list, Is

Re: [NTG-context] Itemize without page break

2012-03-19 Thread Hans Hagen
On 19-3-2012 00:29, Kip Warner wrote: I've cc'd the luatex user mailing list since this is probably, I suppose, a luatex issue more than a ConTeXt one. not that probable One other thing that I should have made more clear, this only happens when I insert the aforementioned line correction

Re: [NTG-context] Itemize without page break

2012-03-19 Thread Hans Hagen
On 19-3-2012 00:25, Kip Warner wrote: The good news is that this is probably what I need. The bad news is luatex completely blows itself to pieces, allocating memory until the system crashes. Packaging itemizes are on a todo list as I sometimes need it myself, but it has a low priority

Re: [NTG-context] Itemize without page break

2012-03-19 Thread Kip Warner
On Mon, 2012-03-19 at 22:49 +0100, Hans Hagen wrote: On 19-3-2012 00:29, Kip Warner wrote: I've cc'd the luatex user mailing list since this is probably, I suppose, a luatex issue more than a ConTeXt one. not that probable Actually highly probably, since the seg fault is raised in

Re: [NTG-context] Itemize without page break

2012-03-19 Thread Kip Warner
On Mon, 2012-03-19 at 22:50 +0100, Hans Hagen wrote: Packaging itemizes are on a todo list as I sometimes need it myself, but it has a low priority Ok, but I thought they were already packaged with context? -- Kip Warner -- Software Engineer OpenPGP encrypted/signed mail preferred

Re: [NTG-context] Itemize without page break

2012-03-19 Thread Kip Warner
On Mon, 2012-03-19 at 09:17 +0100, Wolfgang Schuster wrote: Make a example because this works: \starttext %\dorecurse{2}{\input tufte\par} \dorecurse{3}{\input tufte\par} \startitemize[before={\startlinecorrection[blank]},after= \stoplinecorrection] \dorecurse{4}{\startitem \input

Re: [NTG-context] Itemize without page break

2012-03-19 Thread Wolfgang Schuster
Am 20.03.2012 um 02:04 schrieb Kip Warner: On Mon, 2012-03-19 at 09:17 +0100, Wolfgang Schuster wrote: Make a example because this works: \starttext %\dorecurse{2}{\input tufte\par} \dorecurse{3}{\input tufte\par} \startitemize[before={\startlinecorrection[blank]},after=

Re: [NTG-context] Itemize without page break

2012-03-19 Thread Kip Warner
On Tue, 2012-03-20 at 06:22 +0100, Wolfgang Schuster wrote: The problem is the empty second argument. \startitemize[before=\startlinecorrection,after=\stoplinecorrection][] When you pass two arguments with \startitemize the first argument os for keywords (e.g. packed or fit) and second

Re: [NTG-context] Itemize without page break

2012-03-19 Thread Wolfgang Schuster
Am 20.03.2012 um 06:31 schrieb Kip Warner: On Tue, 2012-03-20 at 06:22 +0100, Wolfgang Schuster wrote: The problem is the empty second argument. \startitemize[before=\startlinecorrection,after=\stoplinecorrection][] When you pass two arguments with \startitemize the first argument os for

Re: [NTG-context] Itemize without page break

2012-03-19 Thread Kip Warner
On Tue, 2012-03-20 at 06:46 +0100, Wolfgang Schuster wrote: TeX has it’s problem with certain errors, accept it. It is not a problem with the program raising an error, it was how it went about doing it. It should not have to take down the entire operating system to indicate to the user that

Re: [NTG-context] Itemize without page break

2012-03-18 Thread Kip Warner
On Sat, 2012-03-17 at 11:21 +0100, Wolfgang Schuster wrote: Am 17.03.2012 um 10:21 schrieb luigi scarso: On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 2:47 AM, Kip Warner k...@thevertigo.com wrote: Hey list, Is there any way to hint to ConTeXt that the contents of a \startitemize \stopitemize pair should

Re: [NTG-context] Itemize without page break

2012-03-18 Thread luigi scarso
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 12:25 AM, Kip Warner k...@thevertigo.com wrote: On Sat, 2012-03-17 at 11:21 +0100, Wolfgang Schuster wrote: Am 17.03.2012 um 10:21 schrieb luigi scarso: On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 2:47 AM, Kip Warner k...@thevertigo.com wrote: Hey list, Is there any way to hint to

Re: [NTG-context] Itemize without page break

2012-03-18 Thread Kip Warner
On Sun, 2012-03-18 at 16:25 -0700, Kip Warner wrote: On Sat, 2012-03-17 at 11:21 +0100, Wolfgang Schuster wrote: Am 17.03.2012 um 10:21 schrieb luigi scarso: On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 2:47 AM, Kip Warner k...@thevertigo.com wrote: Hey list, Is there any way to hint to ConTeXt that

Re: [NTG-context] Itemize without page break

2012-03-17 Thread luigi scarso
On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 2:47 AM, Kip Warner k...@thevertigo.com wrote: Hey list, Is there any way to hint to ConTeXt that the contents of a \startitemize \stopitemize pair should try to be all on the same page? plain old tex \vbox{% \startitemize \stopitemize% } ? -- luigi

Re: [NTG-context] Itemize without page break

2012-03-17 Thread Wolfgang Schuster
Am 17.03.2012 um 10:21 schrieb luigi scarso: On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 2:47 AM, Kip Warner k...@thevertigo.com wrote: Hey list, Is there any way to hint to ConTeXt that the contents of a \startitemize \stopitemize pair should try to be all on the same page? plain old tex \vbox{%

Re: [NTG-context] Itemize Prefixes

2012-03-05 Thread Kip Warner
On Sun, 2012-03-04 at 23:26 -0500, Aditya Mahajan wrote: On Sun, 4 Mar 2012, Kip Warner wrote: Hey list, I'd like an itemized list using the following format... Article I ... Article II ... Article III ... ...and so on. I've tried defining the behaviour with...

Re: [NTG-context] Itemize Prefixes

2012-03-05 Thread Aditya Mahajan
On Mon, 5 Mar 2012, Kip Warner wrote: On Sun, 2012-03-04 at 23:26 -0500, Aditya Mahajan wrote: On Sun, 4 Mar 2012, Kip Warner wrote: Hey list, I'd like an itemized list using the following format... Article I ... Article II ... Article III ... ...and so on. I've tried defining the

Re: [NTG-context] Itemize Prefixes

2012-03-05 Thread Kip Warner
On Mon, 2012-03-05 at 22:10 -0500, Aditya Mahajan wrote: Thanks Aditya. A couple questions for you. \defineitemgroup[article] \setupitemgroup [article] [ left={Article }, stopper=, symbol=R, before=\blank, after=\blank, distance=0.5em, ]

Re: [NTG-context] Itemize Prefixes

2012-03-05 Thread Kip Warner
On Mon, 2012-03-05 at 22:10 -0500, Aditya Mahajan wrote: \starttext \startarticle \item First article \item Second article \stoparticle Again Another thing I just noticed is that using \startarticle[start=20] before an item block doesn't always begin counting at that. On some

Re: [NTG-context] Itemize Prefixes

2012-03-05 Thread Aditya Mahajan
On Mon, 5 Mar 2012, Kip Warner wrote: On Mon, 2012-03-05 at 22:10 -0500, Aditya Mahajan wrote: Thanks Aditya. A couple questions for you. \defineitemgroup[article] \setupitemgroup [article] [ left={Article }, stopper=, symbol=R, before=\blank, after=\blank,

Re: [NTG-context] Itemize Prefixes

2012-03-05 Thread Kip Warner
On Mon, 2012-03-05 at 22:44 -0500, Aditya Mahajan wrote: Thats how itemgroup are configured. You cannot mix assignments (key=value) with options. I don't follow. What is the difference between this, \setupitemgroup [article] [ left={Article }, stopper=, symbol=R,

Re: [NTG-context] Itemize Prefixes

2012-03-05 Thread Aditya Mahajan
On Mon, 5 Mar 2012, Kip Warner wrote: On Mon, 2012-03-05 at 22:44 -0500, Aditya Mahajan wrote: Thats how itemgroup are configured. You cannot mix assignments (key=value) with options. I don't follow. What is the difference between this, \setupitemgroup [article] [ left={Article },

Re: [NTG-context] Itemize Prefixes

2012-03-05 Thread Kip Warner
On Tue, 2012-03-06 at 00:22 -0500, Aditya Mahajan wrote: ConTeXt checks if the argument of \setupitemgroup has an assignment (key=value), then it calls a version of \setparameters; otherwise it calls a version of \processcommalist. So, if you use assignments and options in the same command,

Re: [NTG-context] Itemize Prefixes

2012-03-04 Thread Aditya Mahajan
On Sun, 4 Mar 2012, Kip Warner wrote: Hey list, I'd like an itemized list using the following format... Article I ... Article II ... Article III ... ...and so on. I've tried defining the behaviour with... \defineenumeration[article] [location=top, text=Article, between=\blank,

Re: [NTG-context] itemize and \its

2011-12-29 Thread Hans Hagen
On 29-12-2011 16:11, Herbert Voss wrote: this one also worked some weeks ago: \mainlanguage[de] \starttext \startitemize[8,packed] [width=8em,distance=2em,items=5] \ran {no\hss yes} \its I can not do it without \TeX. \mar{+} I use \TeX\ with other packages. \its I hardly use \TeX. \ran{\hss The

Re: [NTG-context] itemize with conversion

2011-12-29 Thread Hans Hagen
On 29-12-2011 13:55, Herbert Voss wrote: \defineconversion[ordinal][\enordinaldaynumber] use \defineconversion[ordinal][\ordinaldaynumber] instead ... it adapts itself to the current language (I'm cleaning up modules and removing off cases and that was one of them, as it makes no sense to

Re: [NTG-context] itemize

2011-12-18 Thread Hans Hagen
On 18-12-2011 19:18, Aditya Mahajan wrote: Hi, With the latest beta \setupitemize[2][packed,joinedup] gives check missing or ungrouped '=' after 'packed' in line 2 (@@opitemize:2:) fixed in next upload (case _a and _b needs to be swapped) Hans

Re: [NTG-context] Itemize option “text”

2011-12-15 Thread Otared Kavian
On 15 déc. 2011, at 10:38, Andreas Harder wrote: Hi Hans, itemize with option “text” gives me still an error (beta: 15-Dec-2011 09:27). \startitemize[text] \item alpha \item beta \item gamma \stopitemize Regards Andreas Hi Andreas, It is correct that the latest beta has

Re: [NTG-context] Itemize right-aligned

2011-08-22 Thread Wolfgang Schuster
Hi, is it possible to right-align enumerations? Giving something like the following This is the first item * A somewhat longer second item * A short third item * Thanks Erik No but you can use descriptions to get this output: \definedescription [myitem]

  1   2   3   >