Re: [NTG-context] luatex-plain metapost

2009-10-26 Thread Taco Hoekwater
luigi scarso wrote: On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 6:30 PM, Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl wrote: forget about metafun in plain ... it cooperates with mkiv and it's very unlikely that i'll ever make it generic ok , but this also doesn't work \pdfoutput=1 \setmplibformat{plain} \mplibcode

Re: [NTG-context] luatex-plain metapost

2009-10-26 Thread luigi scarso
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 9:08 AM, Taco Hoekwater t...@elvenkind.com wrote: luigi scarso wrote: On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 6:30 PM, Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl wrote: forget about metafun in plain ... it cooperates with mkiv and it's very unlikely that i'll ever make it generic ok , but this also

Re: [NTG-context] luatex-plain metapost

2009-10-26 Thread Taco Hoekwater
luigi scarso wrote: On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 9:08 AM, Taco Hoekwater t...@elvenkind.com wrote: luigi scarso wrote: On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 6:30 PM, Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl wrote: forget about metafun in plain ... it cooperates with mkiv and it's very unlikely that i'll ever make it generic

Re: [NTG-context] luatex-plain metapost

2009-10-26 Thread luigi scarso
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 10:47 AM, Taco Hoekwater t...@elvenkind.com wrote: luigi scarso wrote: On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 9:08 AM, Taco Hoekwater t...@elvenkind.com wrote: luigi scarso wrote: On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 6:30 PM, Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl wrote: forget about metafun in plain ... it

Re: [NTG-context] luatex-plain metapost

2009-10-26 Thread Hans Hagen
luigi scarso wrote: On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 9:08 AM, Taco Hoekwater t...@elvenkind.com wrote: luigi scarso wrote: On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 6:30 PM, Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl wrote: forget about metafun in plain ... it cooperates with mkiv and it's very unlikely that i'll ever make it generic

Re: [NTG-context] luatex-plain metapost

2009-10-26 Thread Taco Hoekwater
luigi scarso wrote: OK -- I understand this. Any plan to implement btex...etex in mplib ? Not btex ... etex, no. Maybe something new will appear in the long run, maybe not. Best wishes, Taco ___ If your question

Re: [NTG-context] luatex-plain metapost

2009-10-26 Thread luigi scarso
luigi scarso wrote: OK -- I understand this. Any plan to implement btex...etex in mplib ? Not btex ... etex, no. Maybe something new will appear in the long run, maybe not. Best wishes, Taco well, you can set up some kind of mechanism that eventually produces a picture that mp can

Re: [NTG-context] luatex-plain metapost

2009-10-26 Thread Dohyun Kim
2009/10/26 luigi scarso luigi.sca...@gmail.com: luigi scarso wrote: OK -- I understand this. Any plan to implement btex...etex in mplib ? Not btex ... etex, no. Maybe something new will appear in the long run, maybe not. Best wishes, Taco well, you can set up some kind of mechanism that

Re: [NTG-context] luatex-plain metapost

2009-10-25 Thread Hans Hagen
luigi scarso wrote: I'm experimenting with luatex-plain in minimals, cfr. label(textext(Foo),(0bp,0bp)); textext is a mkiv feature Hans - Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE

Re: [NTG-context] luatex-plain metapost

2009-10-25 Thread luigi scarso
On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 4:54 PM, Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl wrote: luigi scarso wrote: I'm experimenting with luatex-plain in minimals, cfr.        label(textext(Foo),(0bp,0bp)); textext is a mkiv feature not a metafun macro ? Anyway, this also doesn't work %luatex-test-wrong.tex

Re: [NTG-context] luatex-plain metapost

2009-10-25 Thread Hans Hagen
luigi scarso wrote: On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 4:54 PM, Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl wrote: luigi scarso wrote: I'm experimenting with luatex-plain in minimals, cfr. label(textext(Foo),(0bp,0bp)); textext is a mkiv feature not a metafun macro ? Anyway, this also doesn't work

Re: [NTG-context] luatex-plain metapost

2009-10-25 Thread luigi scarso
On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 6:30 PM, Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl wrote: forget about metafun in plain ... it cooperates with mkiv and it's very unlikely that i'll ever make it generic ok , but this also doesn't work \pdfoutput=1 \setmplibformat{plain} \mplibcode beginfig(1) ; draw