luigi scarso wrote:
On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 6:30 PM, Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl wrote:
forget about metafun in plain ... it cooperates with mkiv and it's very
unlikely that i'll ever make it generic
ok , but this also doesn't work
\pdfoutput=1
\setmplibformat{plain}
\mplibcode
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 9:08 AM, Taco Hoekwater t...@elvenkind.com wrote:
luigi scarso wrote:
On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 6:30 PM, Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl wrote:
forget about metafun in plain ... it cooperates with mkiv and it's very
unlikely that i'll ever make it generic
ok , but this also
luigi scarso wrote:
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 9:08 AM, Taco Hoekwater t...@elvenkind.com wrote:
luigi scarso wrote:
On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 6:30 PM, Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl wrote:
forget about metafun in plain ... it cooperates with mkiv and it's very
unlikely that i'll ever make it generic
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 10:47 AM, Taco Hoekwater t...@elvenkind.com wrote:
luigi scarso wrote:
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 9:08 AM, Taco Hoekwater t...@elvenkind.com wrote:
luigi scarso wrote:
On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 6:30 PM, Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl wrote:
forget about metafun in plain ... it
luigi scarso wrote:
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 9:08 AM, Taco Hoekwater t...@elvenkind.com wrote:
luigi scarso wrote:
On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 6:30 PM, Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl wrote:
forget about metafun in plain ... it cooperates with mkiv and it's very
unlikely that i'll ever make it generic
luigi scarso wrote:
OK -- I understand this.
Any plan to implement btex...etex in mplib ?
Not btex ... etex, no.
Maybe something new will appear in the long run, maybe not.
Best wishes,
Taco
___
If your question
luigi scarso wrote:
OK -- I understand this.
Any plan to implement btex...etex in mplib ?
Not btex ... etex, no.
Maybe something new will appear in the long run, maybe not.
Best wishes,
Taco
well, you can set up some kind of mechanism
that eventually produces a picture that mp can
2009/10/26 luigi scarso luigi.sca...@gmail.com:
luigi scarso wrote:
OK -- I understand this.
Any plan to implement btex...etex in mplib ?
Not btex ... etex, no.
Maybe something new will appear in the long run, maybe not.
Best wishes,
Taco
well, you can set up some kind of mechanism
that
luigi scarso wrote:
I'm experimenting with
luatex-plain in minimals, cfr.
label(textext(Foo),(0bp,0bp));
textext is a mkiv feature
Hans
-
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 4:54 PM, Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl wrote:
luigi scarso wrote:
I'm experimenting with
luatex-plain in minimals, cfr.
label(textext(Foo),(0bp,0bp));
textext is a mkiv feature
not a metafun macro ?
Anyway, this also doesn't work
%luatex-test-wrong.tex
luigi scarso wrote:
On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 4:54 PM, Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl wrote:
luigi scarso wrote:
I'm experimenting with
luatex-plain in minimals, cfr.
label(textext(Foo),(0bp,0bp));
textext is a mkiv feature
not a metafun macro ?
Anyway, this also doesn't work
11 matches
Mail list logo
