Re: [NTG-context] math signs in itemize

2011-09-26 Thread Wolfgang Schuster
Am 26.09.2011 um 00:23 schrieb Aditya Mahajan: On Mon, 26 Sep 2011, R. Ermers wrote: My one and only math item -- $\frac1{40}$ -- does cause a problem though. Apparently there is no math fallback. Hard to say without an example. Any suggestions? Use text mode fractions!

Re: [NTG-context] math signs in itemize

2011-09-26 Thread Alan Braslau
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 09:34:45AM +0200, Wolfgang Schuster wrote: Any suggestions? Use text mode fractions! \frac{1}{40}. This is still typeset in math mode. A alternative is to write the fraction as “1/40”. ¼÷10, 0.025. How about: \definetypeface [xits] [mm] [math] [xits] [default]

Re: [NTG-context] math signs in itemize

2011-09-26 Thread Wolfgang Schuster
Am 26.09.2011 um 10:49 schrieb Alan Braslau: On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 09:34:45AM +0200, Wolfgang Schuster wrote: Any suggestions? Use text mode fractions! \frac{1}{40}. This is still typeset in math mode. A alternative is to write the fraction as “1/40”. ¼÷10, 0.025.

Re: [NTG-context] math signs in itemize

2011-09-26 Thread Paul Menzel
Am Montag, den 26.09.2011, 11:01 +0200 schrieb Wolfgang Schuster: \definefontfeature[frac][frac=yes,script=latn] \setupbodyfont[cambria] Is there a font in Standalone which can be used to demonstrate the behavior? \starttext 1/40 {\setff{frac}1/40} \m{\frac{1}{40}} With

Re: [NTG-context] math signs in itemize

2011-09-26 Thread Khaled Hosny
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 11:31:09AM +0200, Paul Menzel wrote: Am Montag, den 26.09.2011, 11:01 +0200 schrieb Wolfgang Schuster: \definefontfeature[frac][frac=yes,script=latn] \setupbodyfont[cambria] Is there a font in Standalone which can be used to demonstrate the behavior? XITS, but

Re: [NTG-context] math signs in itemize

2011-09-26 Thread R. Ermers
Thanks all, for your reactions. I tried them all, but the process still stops at the \frac, which I changed now into \frac{1}{40}, whatever I do. The gentium font does not load properly; the file is typeset in Times instead. I get these strange references to gentium instead. Regards, Robert

Re: [NTG-context] math signs in itemize

2011-09-25 Thread Alan Braslau
On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 11:29:32AM +0200, R. Ermers wrote: Dear all, After my update a few days ago I have run into the problem earlier described under the subject new beta (Marco Pessotto). The file processed nicely until then. I use gentium as the main font.

Re: [NTG-context] math signs in itemize

2011-09-25 Thread R. Ermers
Thanks Alan, But I use very, very little math, only once or twice, as in 7$^{th}$, but I could solve that otherwise. My main problem occurs in itemization. Please have a look at this: l.741 \item h et type van de abc abc abc ? ! \textfont0 is undefined (character 8226). Regards,

Re: [NTG-context] math signs in itemize

2011-09-25 Thread Wolfgang Schuster
Am 24.09.2011 um 11:29 schrieb R. Ermers: Dear all, After my update a few days ago I have run into the problem earlier described under the subject new beta (Marco Pessotto). The file processed nicely until then. I use gentium as the main font. \definefont[gentium][Xserif][name:Gentium

Re: [NTG-context] math signs in itemize

2011-09-25 Thread Alan Braslau
On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 01:02:07PM +0200, R. Ermers wrote: But I use very, very little math, only once or twice, as in 7$^{th}$, but I could solve that otherwise. You may want to use 7\high{th}. My main problem occurs in itemization. Please have a look at this: l.741 \item h

Re: [NTG-context] math signs in itemize

2011-09-25 Thread R. Ermers
Thanks for all your replies! I changed the superscript e into \high{e}. There is one other math item: $\frac1{40}$ in the whole text. I am using mkiv. Until the recent update the document (90 pp.) was processed fine. I add a minimal example below. Thanks again for looking into this problem.

Re: [NTG-context] math signs in itemize

2011-09-25 Thread Wolfgang Schuster
Am 25.09.2011 um 15:08 schrieb R. Ermers: Thanks for all your replies! I changed the superscript e into \high{e}. There is one other math item: $\frac1{40}$ in the whole text. I am using mkiv. Until the recent update the document (90 pp.) was processed fine. I add a minimal example

Re: [NTG-context] math signs in itemize

2011-09-25 Thread Aditya Mahajan
On Sun, 25 Sep 2011, Wolfgang Schuster wrote: Am 25.09.2011 um 15:08 schrieb R. Ermers: Thanks for all your replies! I changed the superscript e into \high{e}. There is one other math item: $\frac1{40}$ in the whole text. I am using mkiv. Until the recent update the document (90 pp.) was

Re: [NTG-context] math signs in itemize

2011-09-25 Thread Wolfgang Schuster
Am 25.09.2011 um 20:36 schrieb Aditya Mahajan: On Sun, 25 Sep 2011, Wolfgang Schuster wrote: Am 25.09.2011 um 15:08 schrieb R. Ermers: Thanks for all your replies! I changed the superscript e into \high{e}. There is one other math item: $\frac1{40}$ in the whole text. I am using

Re: [NTG-context] math signs in itemize

2011-09-25 Thread R. Ermers
Thanks for all advices! I solved the problem, at least partially. I now use \usetypescriptfile[type-gentium] For some reason I have to change the signs in the unnumbered lists. My one and only math item -- $\frac1{40}$ -- does cause a problem though. Apparently there is no math fallback. Any

Re: [NTG-context] math signs in itemize

2011-09-25 Thread Aditya Mahajan
On Mon, 26 Sep 2011, R. Ermers wrote: My one and only math item -- $\frac1{40}$ -- does cause a problem though. Apparently there is no math fallback. Hard to say without an example. Any suggestions? Use text mode fractions! \frac{1}{40}. Aditya