Yue Wang wrote:
LuaTools | running command: luatex --ini --lua=cont-en.luc
Jikes, I am afraid luatools is too new now: this needs the luatex trunk,
not beta-0.20.0 :-(
___
If your question is of interest to others
On Jan 28, 2008 1:11 PM, Yue Wang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I see the Jan 26 version of context so I just want to upgrade my system.
As what I did before, go to http://minimals.contextgarden.net/ and
download the file, unzip it and run.
after rsync, it cannot generate the mkiv format
You need a very recent luatex from the SVN trunk (revision = 979).
Arthur
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl /
Yue Wang wrote:
Hi,
I see the Jan 26 version of context so I just want to upgrade my system.
As what I did before, go to http://minimals.contextgarden.net/ and
download the file, unzip it and run.
after rsync, it cannot generate the mkiv format (other formats are fine)
I run Debian on x86
Yue Wang wrote:
Hi,
I see the Jan 26 version of context so I just want to upgrade my system.
As what I did before, go to http://minimals.contextgarden.net/ and
download the file, unzip it and run.
after rsync, it cannot generate the mkiv format (other formats are fine)
I run Debian on x86
On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 1:36 AM, Mojca Miklavec
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 28, 2008 5:02 PM, Arthur Reutenauer wrote:
You need a very recent luatex from the SVN trunk (revision = 979).
Should I update binaries to the latest SVN version of LuaTeX? (for the
platforms I have access
On Jan 28, 2008 6:43 PM, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
Mojca Miklavec wrote:
On Jan 28, 2008 5:02 PM, Arthur Reutenauer wrote:
You need a very recent luatex from the SVN trunk (revision = 979).
Should I update binaries to the latest SVN version of LuaTeX? (for the
platforms I have access to,
Taco Hoekwater wrote:
Mojca Miklavec wrote:
On Jan 28, 2008 5:02 PM, Arthur Reutenauer wrote:
You need a very recent luatex from the SVN trunk (revision = 979).
Should I update binaries to the latest SVN version of LuaTeX? (for the
platforms I have access to, i.e. mac intel, linux 32
Mojca Miklavec wrote:
On Jan 28, 2008 5:02 PM, Arthur Reutenauer wrote:
You need a very recent luatex from the SVN trunk (revision = 979).
Should I update binaries to the latest SVN version of LuaTeX? (for the
platforms I have access to, i.e. mac intel, linux 32 akira's windows
bin)
You
On Jan 28, 2008, at 5:38 PM, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
Jikes, I am afraid luatools is too new now: this needs the luatex
trunk,
not beta-0.20.0 :-(
Well, I can confirm that things work with a fresh svn checkout and the
latest current. Funny, Taco and Hans racing each other :-)
All best
But luatools should be patched as well. Passing an argument completely
coverd in quotes is not right, even if it accidentally does work with
the latest binary.
That's what I thought, too. Thanks for confirming it.
Arthur
Mojca Miklavec wrote:
On Jan 28, 2008 5:02 PM, Arthur Reutenauer wrote:
You need a very recent luatex from the SVN trunk (revision = 979).
Should I update binaries to the latest SVN version of LuaTeX? (for the
platforms I have access to, i.e. mac intel, linux 32 akira's windows
bin)
yes
12 matches
Mail list logo
