Re: [NTG-context] unicode subscripts

2010-05-30 Thread Hans Hagen
On 29-5-2010 6:58, Yury G. Kudryashov wrote: Hi! Unicode subscripts do not work (at least, in math): \starttext $a₀₁₂₃₄₅₆₇₈₉₋₌₊$ \stoptext prints only a. The file char-def.lua contains block like this: [0x2080]={ category=no, description=SUBSCRIPT ZERO, direction=en,

Re: [NTG-context] unicode subscripts

2010-05-30 Thread Yury G. Kudryashov
Hans Hagen wrote: On 29-5-2010 6:58, Yury G. Kudryashov wrote: Hi! Unicode subscripts do not work (at least, in math): P.S.: Superscript digits work. Probably, the font contains ¹ but not ₁. in which case ... do you expect that glyph? or maybe one special for math? and does its size

Re: [NTG-context] unicode subscripts

2010-05-30 Thread Khaled Hosny
On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 03:35:12PM +0200, Hans Hagen wrote: On 29-5-2010 6:58, Yury G. Kudryashov wrote: Hi! Unicode subscripts do not work (at least, in math): \starttext $a₀₁₂₃₄₅₆₇₈₉₋₌₊$ \stoptext prints only a. The file char-def.lua contains block like this: [0x2080]={

Re: [NTG-context] unicode subscripts

2010-05-30 Thread Hans Hagen
On 30-5-2010 5:01, Khaled Hosny wrote: Those characters are not intended for use as real sub/superscripts, they are their for round trip compatibility (AKA the source of all Unicode discrepancies). indeed, which is why using them is on user's own risk Hans

Re: [NTG-context] unicode subscripts

2010-05-30 Thread Hans Hagen
On 30-5-2010 4:52, Yury G. Kudryashov wrote: Hans Hagen wrote: On 29-5-2010 6:58, Yury G. Kudryashov wrote: Hi! Unicode subscripts do not work (at least, in math): P.S.: Superscript digits work. Probably, the font contains ¹ but not ₁. in which case ... do you expect that glyph? or maybe