Re: [NTG-context] wrong heights in TABLE

2010-03-11 Thread Peter Münster
On Wed, Mar 10 2010, Hans Hagen wrote: \starttext Problem:\blank \bTABLE \bTR \bTH 1. col\eTH \bTH 2. col \eTH \eTR \bTR \bTD 1 row in 1. col \eTD \bTD[nr=2] 2 rows in 2. col \eTD \eTR \bTR \bTD[nr=2] 2 rows in 1. col\eTD

Re: [NTG-context] wrong heights in TABLE

2010-03-11 Thread Hans Hagen
On 11-3-2010 10:31, Peter Münster wrote: On Wed, Mar 10 2010, Hans Hagen wrote: \starttext Problem:\blank \bTABLE \bTR \bTH 1. col\eTH \bTH 2. col \eTH \eTR \bTR \bTD 1 row in 1. col \eTD \bTD[nr=2] 2 rows in 2. col \eTD \eTR \bTR \bTD[nr=2] 2 rows in 1.

Re: [NTG-context] wrong heights in TABLE

2010-03-10 Thread Taco Hoekwater
Peter Münster wrote: TIA for any hint! Cheers, Peter This second example is a broken table specifier when no modes are enabled: it produces and empty row, which is a no-no. Best wishes, Taco ___ If your

Re: [NTG-context] wrong heights in TABLE

2010-03-10 Thread Taco Hoekwater
Peter Münster wrote: Where could be the problem? My guess is: when you have a row that somehow consists only of cells with multiple rowspan specifiers, the height of that row is miscalculated. Best wishes, Taco

Re: [NTG-context] wrong heights in TABLE

2010-03-10 Thread Peter Münster
On Wed, Mar 10 2010, Taco Hoekwater wrote: This second example is a broken table specifier when no modes are enabled: it produces and empty row, which is a no-no. Ok, here an even better and smaller example-test-file: \starttext Problem:\blank \bTABLE \bTR \bTH 1. col\eTH \bTH

Re: [NTG-context] wrong heights in TABLE

2010-03-10 Thread Hans Hagen
On 10-3-2010 9:05, Taco Hoekwater wrote: Peter Münster wrote: TIA for any hint! Cheers, Peter This second example is a broken table specifier when no modes are enabled: it produces and empty row, which is a no-no. indeed, i played with catching it but it's too much work so that has to

Re: [NTG-context] wrong heights in TABLE

2010-03-10 Thread Hans Hagen
On 10-3-2010 9:08, Taco Hoekwater wrote: Peter Münster wrote: Where could be the problem? My guess is: when you have a row that somehow consists only of cells with multiple rowspan specifiers, the height of that row is miscalculated. that's indeed the case and finding a solutions is non

Re: [NTG-context] wrong heights in TABLE

2010-03-10 Thread Hans Hagen
On 10-3-2010 9:32, Peter Münster wrote: On Wed, Mar 10 2010, Taco Hoekwater wrote: This second example is a broken table specifier when no modes are enabled: it produces and empty row, which is a no-no. Ok, here an even better and smaller example-test-file: \starttext Problem:\blank \bTABLE

Re: [NTG-context] wrong heights in TABLE

2010-03-09 Thread Peter Münster
Hello, Here a better minimal example-test-file: \startbuffer \setupTABLE[c][1,2,3][height=4ex] \bTABLE[width=0.2\textwidth] \bTR \bTH 1. col\eTH \bTH 2. col\eTH \doifmode{wa2}{\bTH 3. col\eTH} \eTR \bTR \bTD 1 row in 1. col\eTD \bTD[nr=2] 2 rows in 2. col\eTD \doifmode{wa2}{\bTD\eTD} \eTR \bTR