Re: [NTG-context] wrong xml char handling

2016-02-10 Thread Hans Hagen

On 2/10/2016 3:38 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:

On 02/10/2016 01:51 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:

On 2/10/2016 12:19 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:

[...]
Sorry for sounding impatient, but since next beta may take longer to be
released (because of columnsets), would it be possible to have a patch
to use latest released beta?


patch involves more than one line in a few files


OK, this is fine for me. I only asked because I thought it was a simple
replacement.


fwiw: here we never used the latest beta in critical workflows unless
tested beforehand (so we always lag a few betas behind)


Many thanks for the advice.

My workflow isn’t really critical. Sorry, but I’m afraid I don’t earn a
living (or even make money) with ConTeXt.

I think it makes sense that I work with latest beta. This is the only
way I can reasonably test it, so I may report issues that will benefit
every ConTeXt user (including myself :-)).

But, please, let me know whehter my previous assumption is wrong.


sounds ok to me but then you have to wait till i update (one of these days)

Hans

-
  Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
  Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
  tel: 038 477 53 69 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl
-
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___

Re: [NTG-context] wrong xml char handling

2016-02-10 Thread Pablo Rodriguez
On 02/10/2016 01:51 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
> On 2/10/2016 12:19 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
>> [...]
>> Sorry for sounding impatient, but since next beta may take longer to be
>> released (because of columnsets), would it be possible to have a patch
>> to use latest released beta?
> 
> patch involves more than one line in a few files

OK, this is fine for me. I only asked because I thought it was a simple
replacement.

> fwiw: here we never used the latest beta in critical workflows unless 
> tested beforehand (so we always lag a few betas behind)

Many thanks for the advice.

My workflow isn’t really critical. Sorry, but I’m afraid I don’t earn a
living (or even make money) with ConTeXt.

I think it makes sense that I work with latest beta. This is the only
way I can reasonably test it, so I may report issues that will benefit
every ConTeXt user (including myself :-)).

But, please, let me know whehter my previous assumption is wrong.

Many thanks for your help,

Pablo
-- 
http://www.ousia.tk
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___

Re: [NTG-context] wrong xml char handling

2016-02-10 Thread Pablo Rodriguez
On 02/09/2016 06:02 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
> On 2/9/2016 11:36 AM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
>> [...]
>> Output with latest beta:
>>
>>  Link: http://a.b/c\Ux {23}d
>>
>> Output with beta from 2016.01.14 09:55;
>>
>>  Link: http://a.b/c#d
>>
>> I guess this is a bug. Could anyone else confirm this?
> 
> fixed in next beta

Many thanks for the fix. Hans.

Sorry for sounding impatient, but since next beta may take longer to be
released (because of columnsets), would it be possible to have a patch
to use latest released beta?

Many thanks for your help,

Pablo
-- 
http://www.ousia.tk
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___

Re: [NTG-context] wrong xml char handling

2016-02-10 Thread Hans Hagen

On 2/10/2016 12:19 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:

On 02/09/2016 06:02 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:

On 2/9/2016 11:36 AM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:

[...]
Output with latest beta:

  Link: http://a.b/c\Ux {23}d

Output with beta from 2016.01.14 09:55;

  Link: http://a.b/c#d

I guess this is a bug. Could anyone else confirm this?


fixed in next beta


Many thanks for the fix. Hans.

Sorry for sounding impatient, but since next beta may take longer to be
released (because of columnsets), would it be possible to have a patch
to use latest released beta?


patch involves more than one line in a few files

fwiw: here we never used the latest beta in critical workflows unless 
tested beforehand (so we always lag a few betas behind)


-
  Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
  Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
  tel: 038 477 53 69 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl
-
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___

Re: [NTG-context] wrong xml char handling

2016-02-09 Thread Hans Hagen

On 2/9/2016 11:36 AM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:

Dear list,

I’m afraid there may be a bug in betas from February (including the
latest one from 2016.02.08 15:35):

 \startbuffer[demo]
 
  Link: http://a.b/c#d;>http://a.b/c#d
 
 \stopbuffer

 \starttext

 \startxmlsetups xml:initialize
  \xmlsetsetup{#1}{p|doc|a}{xml:*}
  \xmlsetsetup{\xmldocument}{span[@label]}{xml:logo}
 \stopxmlsetups

 \xmlregistersetup{xml:initialize}

 \startxmlsetups xml:doc
  \xmlflush{#1}
 \stopxmlsetups

 \startxmlsetups xml:p
  \xmlflush{#1}\par
 \stopxmlsetups

 \startxmlsetups xml:a
 \mypersonalurl{\xmlflush{#1}}
 \stopxmlsetups

 \def\mypersonalurl#1{\bgroup\tt\goto{%
 \hyphenatedurl{#1}}[url(#1)]\egroup}%
 \unexpanded\def\href#1#2{\goto{#2} [url(#1)]}

 \xmlprocessbuffer{main}{demo}{}

 \stoptext

Output with latest beta:

 Link: http://a.b/c\Ux {23}d

Output with beta from 2016.01.14 09:55;

 Link: http://a.b/c#d

I guess this is a bug. Could anyone else confirm this?


fixed in next beta

-
  Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
  Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
  tel: 038 477 53 69 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl
-
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___