After using latest code from git, the problem is indeed solved! Thanks a lot Alfredo!
On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 1:43 AM, Alfredo Cardigliano <cardigli...@ntop.org> wrote: > Hi Amir > the commit below should solve your issue, please pull latest code from git > > Alfredo > > > https://github.com/ntop/PF_RING/commit/b67a6f46a06e68f2bb6cc53e9d452cc2cbe5f18f > > On 12 May 2015, at 12:15, Amir Kaduri <akadur...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Alfredo, > > The application itself is one of the example application provided by > pf_ring itself called "pfcount". > Here is a decription of he steps done: > Download pf_ring 6.0.3 and compile it 64bit (including drivers' > PF_RING_aware subdirectory). > (need to fix a small bug in pfcount.c by adding "break;" at line 799, so > that it will be possible to use the option "-u"). > On production env, suppose current working directory is PF_RING's source > root. > > From this point, the commands are: > rmmod ixgbe > rmmod pf_ring > insmod ./kernel/pf_ring.ko > insmod ./drivers/PF_RING_aware/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe-3.22.3-zc/src/ixgbe.ko > ./userland/examples/pfcount -i eth3 -w 1 -m -v 1 -u 1 > > You can replay the following pcap that contains 344 packets: > > https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B10Ms5GOXgCxS0dxR3lTZUoyRHZyUlpoemJfT0k2cS1QRGFr/view?usp=sharing > > You should see that "pfcount" stops showing packets from this pcap (since > the hash filter is applied), but on the other hand, it shows the following > message (especially the first one): > 13:02:28.616480105 [RX][if_index=29][00:30:05:4B:19:2C -> > 00:01:02:03:04:05] [vlan 12] [IPv4][10.12.150.231:2489 -> 10.61.12.31:139] > [l3_proto=TCP][hash=340372828][tos=0][tcp_seq_num=3256921511] > [caplen=128][len=242][parsed_header_len=0][eth_offset=0][l3_offset=18][l4_offset=38][payload_offset=58] > > pfring_add_hash_filtering_rule(1) failed > > This error message indicates that pfring_add_hash_filtering_rule() > returned failure in userland. > Note that despite the returned error in userland, the hash rule has been > added successfully in the kernel. > > Thanks, > Amir > > On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 8:02 PM, Alfredo Cardigliano <cardigli...@ntop.org > > wrote: > >> Hi Amir >> could you provide a sample application, or a code snippet, we can use to >> reproduce the issue? >> >> Thank you >> Alfredo >> >> > On 11 May 2015, at 10:52, Amir Kaduri <akadur...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> > Hi, >> > >> > I'm experiencing a possible bug in the API >> pfring_handle_hash_filtering_rule(), when adding a rule. >> > The API return -1 (failure) although the hash rule has been added >> successfully. >> > I experience it in versions 6.0.2 and 6.0.3. >> > In version 6.0.1 it works fine. >> > Can anyone please confirm that there is a bug? >> > If yes, can I have a patch for it, or even a quick-and-dirty >> explanation on how to solve it? >> > >> > Thanks, >> > Amir > >
_______________________________________________ Ntop-misc mailing list Ntop-misc@listgateway.unipi.it http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop-misc
