I use them, but my environment is much smaller. We're stuck in the NSA 2XX
range for cost reasons, but I wish I could jump up a notch or two for
performance.
I think the key is what features you'll be using and what throughput the
firewall can manage when using them. IIRC, the big performance
To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: Re: [NTSysADM] Sonic Wall model/sizing
I use them, but my environment is much smaller. We're stuck in the NSA 2XX
range for cost reasons, but I wish I could jump up a notch or two for
performance.
I think the key is what features you'll be using and what
provided earlier?
--
*From:* listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [listsad...@lists.myitforum.com]
on behalf of Richard Stovall [rich...@gmail.com]
*Sent:* Wednesday, November 13, 2013 1:00 PM
*To:* ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com
*Subject:* Re: [NTSysADM] Sonic Wall model
...@lists.myitforum.com]
on behalf of Richard Stovall [rich...@gmail.com]
*Sent:* Wednesday, November 13, 2013 1:00 PM
*To:* ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com
*Subject:* Re: [NTSysADM] Sonic Wall model/sizing
I use them, but my environment is much smaller. We're stuck in the
NSA 2XX range for cost reasons
of Richard Stovall [rich...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2013 1:36 PM
To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: Re: [NTSysADM] Sonic Wall model/sizing
Frankly, no, given your 200Mbps link (that may go up to 500)[1].
See the following for theoretical maximum throughput numbers
...@lists.myitforum.com]
on behalf of Richard Stovall [rich...@gmail.com]
*Sent:* Wednesday, November 13, 2013 1:36 PM
*To:* ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com
*Subject:* Re: [NTSysADM] Sonic Wall model/sizing
Frankly, no, given your 200Mbps link (that may go up to 500)[1].
See the following for theoretical
6 matches
Mail list logo