Thanks guys makes sense
Cheers
Graeme
On Wed, 13 Sep 2017 at 00:23, Kurt Buff wrote:
> +1
> - create a directory at the root, and share that, not the root.
> - Remove the NTFS permissions for Users from the root, and assign it to
> the directory, with Read-Only (this
We use Kaspersky for our AV needs, and to be honest, it's worked out
well for us. It's certainly caught things that McAfee, our previous AV
solution, didn't. However, they have this slight problem with being a
covert arm of the Russian government, apparently ..
So we need to drop them, as the
As I've recommended Kaspersky for about a decade now, I'm interested in knowing
your source. :-)
I know that the USA is less and less happy with Russia... But I've not found
anything that even seems official...
-Original Message-
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com
Years ago I stopped using Symantec and MacAfee because both were resource hogs,
missed stuff, and put all kind of shims into the OS making it a rebuild every
time I had to upgrade them. Both were pains. I was happier with ESET but cost
got too high for management and they wanted to go back to
Looks like the WH's cybersecurity dude announced it.
http://www.businessinsider.com/kaspersky-is-being-banned-across-the-us-government-by-trump-2017-9
-Original Message-
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Michael B. Smith
Sent:
But he doesn't say anything is wrong.
It's just another step in the increasing tension between Russia and the USA as
far as I can see.
-Original Message-
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Kennedy, Jim
Sent: Thursday, September 14,
So we are taking a page from the Russian playbook. As Eugene Kaspersky tweeted
in response to the DHS directive. “I guess this explains it all “Guilty ‘til
proven innocent, jailed ‘til you clear your name” Welcome to 21st century.”
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com
I have no issues with Kaspersky and would have no problem keeping it in my
environment.
That said, I currently use Webroot in ours, which is about 1k users with some
laptops around the country and world like yours and its ok. I dont like the
management of it and its a little buggy at times
Here we go, DHS announcement.
https://www.dhs.gov/news/2017/09/13/dhs-statement-issuance-binding-operational-directive-17-01
-Original Message-
From: Kennedy, Jim
Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2017 2:26 PM
To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [NTSysADM] Dropping Kaspersky Av,
Ohoh.
Yea, I totally agree with that. The concern seems to be 'a relationship between
Kaspersky and the Russia Gov.'.
The same of which could be said of many US Tech firms.
-Original Message-
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of
That's because no one has figured how to say "I love you" in Russian.
Webster
-Original Message-
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Michael B. Smith
Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2017 1:35 PM
To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com
Just playing devil's advocate here - are you required by regulation to actually
use AV?
Because I think it's had its day. App management and other tech are arguably so
much better, and have much less of a resource footprint.
-Original Message-
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com
Yep they all suck and they will all disappoint you. I use Symantec Cloud
because it's cheap and stays out of the way, catches the random thing but
nothing to write home about.
Sophos' Intercept anti-Ransomware tech seems interesting, have a client
using it but haven't gone in depth.
On Thu, Sep
I believe that's a political decision, not backed by any technical detail.
Kurt
On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 11:26 AM, Kennedy, Jim
wrote:
> Looks like the WH's cybersecurity dude announced it.
>
>
14 matches
Mail list logo