Re: Domain controllers, what is supposed to happen.

Even more weird! On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 19:55, Carl Houseman wrote: > I agree.  Unplugging and re-plugging the UTP cable is another choice. > > > > Carl > > > > From: Andrew S. Baker [mailto:asbz...@gmail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2010 9:21 PM > To: NT System Admin Issues > Subject: Re:

Re: Domain controllers, what is supposed to happen.

Weird. On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 18:21, Andrew S. Baker wrote: > It's actually slower to do a release/renew.   I'm still not sure why the > logic for this is so much worse than the other approach. > -ASB: http://XeeSM.com/AndrewBaker > > > On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 8:14 PM, Kurt Buff wrote: >> >> Wo

RE: What is the program?

+1 I have found an occasional app that even admin rights on the program's folders don't work. The latest once was a camera app that did somethign funny with the camera "device". Dave From: John Cook [john.c...@pfsf.org] Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2010 6

RE: Domain controllers, what is supposed to happen.

I agree. Unplugging and re-plugging the UTP cable is another choice. Carl From: Andrew S. Baker [mailto:asbz...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2010 9:21 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Domain controllers, what is supposed to happen. It's actually slower to do a relea

Re: What is the program?

On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 9:52 PM, John Cook wrote: > We've typically found giving them full rights to the > specific program folder works 99% of the time. I don't like to do even that much. Scenario: A1. Luser downloads malware; it compromises program directory A2. Luser complains to admin tha

Re: What is the program?

We've typically found giving them full rights to the specific program folder works 99% of the time. YMMV - Original Message - From: Charlie Kaiser To: NT System Admin Issues Sent: Wed Apr 21 21:33:15 2010 Subject: RE: What is the program? Process monitor or procmon...

Re: What is the program?

On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 9:28 PM, Jon Harris wrote: > I have some applications that claim they need local admin to work ... For that, I would suggest LUA BugLight. It's geared specifically at analyzing what an application does that needs admin rights, and identifying what you need to do to comp

RE: What is the program?

Or you can go and use filemon or regmon also. Z Edward Ziots CISSP,MCSA,MCP+I,Security +,Network +,CCA Network Engineer Lifespan Organization 401-639-3505 ezi...@lifespan.org -Original Message- From: Charlie Kaiser [mailto:charl...@golden-eagle.org] Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2010 9:3

Re: What is the program?

Filemon. The new version is procmon and it's from Sysinternals. -- Sent using BlackBerry From: Jon Harris To: NT System Admin Issues Sent: Wed Apr 21 21:28:54 2010 Subject: What is the program? Okay a bit of old age is hitting me

RE: What is the program?

Process monitor or procmon... *** Charlie Kaiser charl...@golden-eagle.org Kingman, AZ *** > -Original Message- > From: Jon Harris [mailto:jk.har...@gmail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2010 6:29 PM > To: NT System Admin Issues > Subject: What

What is the program?

Okay a bit of old age is hitting me at the moment. What is the program that allows you to watch and application and determine where it is writing to? I have some applications that claim they need local admin to work and the new gig is interested in removing that need. I just can't remember it at

Re: Domain controllers, what is supposed to happen.

It's actually slower to do a release/renew. I'm still not sure why the logic for this is so much worse than the other approach. -ASB: http://XeeSM.com/AndrewBaker On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 8:14 PM, Kurt Buff wrote: > Wouldn't an 'ipconfig /release && ipconfig /renew' do the same thing? > > On

RE: Spontaneous server reboots

Try checking the iLo Logs. It may have an event and error message for your reboots. Michael Walker Senior Network Engineer Citrus Valley Health Partners 140 W. College Street, Covina, CA 91723 Phone/Fax/Pager: (888) 299-6882 mwal...@mail.cvhp.org _

Re: Domain controllers, what is supposed to happen.

Wouldn't an 'ipconfig /release && ipconfig /renew' do the same thing? On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 09:38, Carl Houseman wrote: > When XP is using the secondary DNS and I want it to use the primary which is > now available, I just disable/re-enable the NIC. I believe this holds true > for Vista/7 as we

Re: Printer managment

Don't know about "large" orgs, but my approach would be to 1) Set up new print queues with the names you want, pointing to the machines at their current IP addresses. Don't delete the old queues yet. 2) Get everybody switched over to the new print queues. 3) Set up DHCP reservations for the MACs

Re: WINS (- was RE: Domain controllers, what is supposed to happen.)

I tried removing it on my home network about 12-18 months ago (might even be 24 months) and it was more painful than it was worth. Nothing catastrophic, IIRC, but scripts that depend on the browse list failed. In work environments there are still some apps that support NetBIOS and expect to be ab

RE: McAfee DAT problems

>When has the last time that a virus that any of the AV vendors failed to catch >had as devestating an effect as many organizations as this malignant AV update >did? As I am the only one here now at my org, the last bad Sunbelt dat before I dropped them caused me to redeploy almost every box he

Re: RE: McAfee DAT problems

Perhaps if someone dies because they were not serviced at a hospital in time. Perhaps. I would be surprised if anything happened. OTOH, this could have an Enron-like impact on calls for changing legislation or something. *That* wouldn't surprise me so much. -ASB: http://XeeSM.com/AndrewBaker

RE: McAfee DAT problems

>Given how much AV doesn't catch now, is 24 hrs behind even a choice? It's a conundrum, your kind of screwed one way or the other: Risk an infection or risk an outage. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~

Re: Meet Your New Citrix Technology Professional!

Most excellent... and no surprises here. Congratulations, Carl! -- ME2 On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 11:06 AM, Michael B. Smith wrote: > Carl Webster, a regular poster here, was confirmed today as a member of a > very elite group: a Citrix Technology Professional. > > Carl is extremely active answe

Re: McAfee DAT problems

When has the last time that a virus that any of the AV vendors failed to catch had as devestating an effect as many organizations as this malignant AV update did? And how about 12 hours instead of 24? -ASB: http://XeeSM.com/AndrewBaker On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 6:07 PM, Ziots, Edward wrote: > G

RE: McAfee DAT problems

+1, Yep I am sure they are going to be made very aware, and its going to hurt "a lot" from a financial standpoint and from a reputation standpoint. But until the legal battles are waged and issues resolved, who knows what the true fall-out from items. Z Edward Ziots CISSP,MCSA,MCP+I

Re: UPSes

I feel that there is more parity in quality these days across brands. That makes it easier to choose equipment with the right connectors. -ASB: http://XeeSM.com/AndrewBaker Sent from my Motorola Droid On Apr 21, 2010 11:20 AM, "Angus Scott-Fleming" wrote: [correcting the gag-me-with-a-shovel

RE: RE: McAfee DAT problems

Honestly, this is my personal opinion. I see legal battles over this one coming to pass, and fairly quickly. Z Edward Ziots CISSP,MCSA,MCP+I,Security +,Network +,CCA Network Engineer Lifespan Organization 401-639-3505 ezi...@lifespan.org From: Andrew S. Baker [mailto:asbz...@gmail

Re: RE: McAfee DAT problems

We can only hope that there will be repurcussions for McCrappy, but probably not. Trend had a series of update issues a few years back without any major fallout. -ASB: http://XeeSM.com/AndrewBaker Sent from my Motorola Droid On Apr 21, 2010 5:45 PM, "Walker, Michael" wrote: This was posted a

RE: McAfee DAT problems

Given how much AV doesn't catch now, is 24 hrs behind even a choice? Z Edward Ziots CISSP,MCSA,MCP+I,Security +,Network +,CCA Network Engineer Lifespan Organization 401-639-3505 ezi...@lifespan.org -Original Message- From: Joseph L. Casale [mailto:jcas...@activenetwerx.com] Sent: Wedn

Re: Any C.E.H's on list

Zing! -- ME2 On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 1:28 PM, Joseph Heaton wrote: > Certified Excrement Handler? > > >>> "Ziots, Edward" 4/21/2010 1:20 PM >>> > If there are any C.E.H's on the list that want to talk to me offline > about their experiences accordingly. Next Cert I am going for, along > with

RE: McAfee DAT problems

Thanks My company has made world news. Joy Joy. Not FUNNY J Z Edward Ziots CISSP,MCSA,MCP+I,Security +,Network +,CCA Network Engineer Lifespan Organization 401-639-3505 ezi...@lifespan.org From: Walker, Michael [mailto:mwal...@mail.cvhp.org] Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2010 5

RE: McAfee DAT problems

>This was posted an hour ago - >  >McAfee antivirus program goes berserk, freezes PCs So like McAfee said, I don't see the problem with Hospitals and Cops not having service? This has started to become an epidemic it seems with av vendors and incompetent QA. I remember years ago after that dod

RE: McAfee DAT problems

This was posted an hour ago - McAfee antivirus program goes berserk, freezes PCs By PETER SVENSSON, AP Technology Writer Peter Svensson, Ap Technology Writer - 26 mins ago NEW YORK - Computers in companies, hospitals and schools around the world got stuck repeatedly rebooting themselves Wedne

Re: WINS (- was RE: Domain controllers, what is supposed to happen.)

+1. I've learned the hard-way, that its not worth removing in most circumstances. -- ME2 On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 7:21 AM, Ben Scott wrote: > On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 10:17 AM, Raper, Jonathan - Eagle > wrote: > > Speaking of WINS, if you don’t have any non-windows or pre-w2k clients, > is > >

RE: McAfee DAT problems

I have a feeling they are going to be made 'aware' very soonheh heh Bill Lambert Concuity Phone 847-941-9206 The information contained in this e-mail message, including any attached files, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. If you

RE: McAfee DAT problems

WTH? ''We are not aware of significant impact on consumers and believe we have effectively limited such occurrence,'' the company said in a statement. From: Stu Sjouwerman [mailto:s...@sunbelt-software.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2010 3:39 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subjec

Re: Meet Your New Citrix Technology Professional!

On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 11:06, Michael B. Smith wrote: > Carl Webster, a regular poster here, was confirmed today as a member of a > very elite group: a Citrix Technology Professional. > > Carl is extremely active answering questions regarding Citrix and Remote > Desktop here and on Experts Exch

RE: McAfee DAT problems

We just finished up the cleaning up. Had some issues where this shutdown network connectivity, some where the system wouldn't recognize the USB drive. In those instances we had to boot into safe mode and uninstall all the McCrappy stuff, then reload it with the previous DAT. Geeesh!!!

Re: McAfee DAT problems

FWIW, rebooting the computers in safe mode and copying the files via command line worked for us. We did not stop the services prior to copying the files over and everything is working just fine. On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 1:39 PM, Ziots, Edward wrote: > Don, > > > > These are working pretty well

Re: McAfee DAT problems

So glad that I finished up my migration to Vipre from McAfee last month. My Wednesday has been rather quiet and peaceful. On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 3:38 PM, Stu Sjouwerman wrote: > OUCH. This one is epic and made NT Times: > > > > McAfee Antivirus Program Goes Berserk, Reboots PCs > > > > > h

RE: McAfee DAT problems

Ed, Yeah, we tried this process (or something very similar) and we were unable to paste anything from a CD/DVD or USB stick. System would recognize the media but not allow us to paste. Didn't try command line. I'll forward this on to our Tech Team. Thx!

RE: McAfee DAT problems

Don, These are working pretty well for us, atm., I have verified these on some serious horked up XP boxes, that had their svchost.exe chewed up. 1) Put Extra.dat and svchost.exe from directory to a CD or memory Stick. 2) Boot to safe mode, log on as local administrator, if yo

RE: McAfee DAT problems

OUCH. This one is epic and made NT Times: McAfee Antivirus Program Goes Berserk, Reboots PCs http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2010/04/21/business/AP-US-TEC-McAfee-Antivirus-Flaw.html?src=busln Warm regards, Stu Sjouwerman Co-Founder, Publisher, Sunbelt Media P: +1-727-562-0101 ext 218 F: +

Re: Any C.E.H's on list

Certified Excrement Handler? >>> "Ziots, Edward" 4/21/2010 1:20 PM >>> If there are any C.E.H's on the list that want to talk to me offline about their experiences accordingly. Next Cert I am going for, along with CISM at the end of the year. I would like to get some insight accordingly. Z

RE: McAfee DAT problems

Yeah we are seriously looking on moving away from Mcafee also, I liked what NOD 32 ESET was showing us. Z Edward Ziots CISSP,MCSA,MCP+I,Security +,Network +,CCA Network Engineer Lifespan Organization 401-639-3505 ezi...@lifespan.org From: Raper, Jonathan - Eagle [mailto:jra...@eag

RE: McAfee DAT problems

FYI. The only way we could fix this was to pull the HDD, copy the Extra.DAT and a good copy of svchost.exe onto the HDD, place HDD back in infected machine. The original svchost.exe file was there where it should be, but 0 bytes. None of the instructions to do this while the systems wer

RE: McAfee DAT problems

So glad we moved away from Mcrapfee to Trend last month! Have not regretted it in the least! BTW, thanks to everyone on the list who responded for your insight into McAfee, Norton, Trend, VIPRE, etc about two months ago. Jonathan L. Raper, A+, MCSA, MCSE Technology Coordinator Eagle Physicians

RE: McAfee DAT problems

I would strongly bet that there is some legalese in their software license agreement that says you agree they are not liable for problems like that. It reminds me of a problem years ago with MailEssentials where they sent out a bad signature file that caused every message to be qualified as spam.

Any C.E.H's on list

If there are any C.E.H's on the list that want to talk to me offline about their experiences accordingly. Next Cert I am going for, along with CISM at the end of the year. I would like to get some insight accordingly. Z Edward Ziots CISSP,MCSA,MCP+I,Security +,Network +,CCA Network Engi

RE: McAfee DAT problems

On top of the millions of dollars of downtime they have caused a lot of companies, I am sure the lawsuits and the fallout is going to be equally brutal. Z Edward Ziots CISSP,MCSA,MCP+I,Security +,Network +,CCA Network Engineer Lifespan Organization 401-639-3505 ezi...@lifespan.org

RE: Meet Your New Citrix Technology Professional!

Good job boss, Z Edward Ziots CISSP,MCSA,MCP+I,Security +,Network +,CCA Network Engineer Lifespan Organization 401-639-3505 ezi...@lifespan.org -Original Message- From: Sean Rector [mailto:sean.rec...@vaopera.org] Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2010 3:58 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subje

Re: McAfee DAT problems

That's a serious qa failure. And it's rather annoying that they can't remove the bad dat file from the internet in a timely fashion. -ASB: http://XeeSM.com/AndrewBaker Sent from my Motorola Droid On Apr 21, 2010 11:48 AM, "Erik Goldoff" wrote: Anyone else heard of problems with the latest Mc

RE: Meet Your New Citrix Technology Professional!

Congratulations Carl! Well done! Sean Rector, MCSE -Original Message- From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2010 2:06 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Meet Your New Citrix Technology Professional! Carl Webster, a regular poster here, was

RE: Starting a VM on a Specific VSphere Host

+1 under drs, rules From: John Cook [mailto:john.c...@pfsf.org] Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2010 1:43 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Starting a VM on a Specific VSphere Host It's called Host Affinity and I think it's under HA or DRS settings IIRC. John W. Cook Systems Admin

RE: Meet Your New Citrix Technology Professional!

Congrats and that is one screwed up captcha! John W. Cook Systems Administrator Partnership For Strong Families 315 SE 2nd Ave Gainesville, Fl 32601 Office (352) 393-2741 x320 Cell (352) 215-6944 Fax (352) 393-2746 MCSE, MCTS, MCP+I, A+, N+, VSP4, VTSP4 From: Carl Webster [mailto:carlwebs

RE: Starting a VM on a Specific VSphere Host

It's called Host Affinity and I think it's under HA or DRS settings IIRC. John W. Cook Systems Administrator Partnership For Strong Families 315 SE 2nd Ave Gainesville, Fl 32601 Office (352) 393-2741 x320 Cell (352) 215-6944 Fax (352) 393-2746 MCSE, MCTS, MCP+I, A+, N+, VSP4, VTSP4 From:

RE: Sophos vs. Vipre Enterprise

I've been using Sophos on desktops for 10 years and love it. When I bought it back then Sophos would allow all my employees to have it on their home computers at no additional cost. I'm not sure they offer that anymore though as they have changed their marketing to go through 3rd party partner

RE: Sophos vs. Vipre Enterprise

Jim, We have been running Sophos Enterprise for 6+ years (2500 Clients -Mac and PC) and CounterSpy Enterprise for 3 (1025 PC clients). We use Sophos for active protection and CounterSpy for passive scanning (Defense in Depth!). We have not upgraded to Vipre yet (nor decided if we will at all)

Starting a VM on a Specific VSphere Host

I am not a VSphere person. How do I set a VM to start on a specific host or use a specific host as the preferred host? Thanks Webster ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ ~

Re: Meet Your New Citrix Technology Professional!

Thanks everyone. This is quite an honor. I am deeply honored by the award. Webster On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 11:06 AM, Michael B. Smith wrote: > Carl Webster, a regular poster here, was confirmed today as a member of a > very elite group: a Citrix Technology Professional. > > Carl is extremely

RE: Sophos vs. Vipre Enterprise

Jim, I utilize Vipre internally, but not the Enterprise version, so if you want some honest answers regarding their protection - I can supply Ken _ From: Jim Holmgren [mailto:jholmg...@xlhealth.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2010 3:22 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Sophos vs.

Sophos vs. Vipre Enterprise

Are there any comparisons out there between Sophos and Vipre Enterprise? I see the marketing materials comparing Vipre with Symantec and McAfee. I've already ruled both Symantec and McAfee out those out and I'm down to Sophos, Trend Micro or Vipre. I'd like to hear from any other Sophos customer

RE: Meet Your New Citrix Technology Professional!

> Yup, that captcha I can't even read.. Me either. Must be in Sanskrit or something. Congrats Web, well deserved! From: Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:saber...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2010 11:26 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Meet Your New Citrix Technology Pr

RE: Meet Your New Citrix Technology Professional!

WORST...CAPTCHA... EVER From: tony patton [mailto:tony.pat...@quinn-insurance.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2010 2:15 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Meet Your New Citrix Technology Professional! Done, but that captcha(?) on the citrix forum is

RE: Web filtering solutions

The TMG URL filtering is pretty good, but I doubt it will be any less costly than SmartFilter. There are cloud-based filtering options these days; McAfee offers a SmartFilter cloud and AT&T has one too. -Malcolm -Original Message- From: Joseph Heaton [mailto:jhea...@dfg.ca.gov] Sent: We

RE: square hole cage nuts?

I forgot all about Middle Atlantic! Good company - I've used a ton of their products over the years, particularly when I was doing AV systems integration. They also have 6MM hardware: http://www.middleatlantic.com/rackac/hardware/hrdwr1.htm#cage Jonathan L. Raper, A+, MCSA, MCSE Technology Coo

RE: New Forefront question

Yep, heard about that a few days ago... great news, as we're getting SCCM through our EA, but not OpsMgr. >>> "Rod Trent" 4/21/2010 9:44 AM >>> Forefront and ConfigMgr integration announced today at MMS 2010. From: Justin Thomas [mailto:jat...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2010 12:4

RE: WINS (- was RE: Domain controllers, what is supposed to happen.)

Truthfully, the requirement is that short-name resolution ALWAYS work and there be no name collisions (in the case of multi-domain forests and multiple-segment networks). Now, the officially supported way to provide that is via WINS and there are KBs to that effect. But a properly constructed

Re: WINS (- was RE: Domain controllers, what is supposed to happen.)

Yup. NETBIOS broadcasts can take care of things on simple enough networks. (Like mine.) http://support.microsoft.com/kb/837391 On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 2:19 PM, Carol Fee wrote: > Are you sure ? We are running Exchange 2003 without WINS and no issues.

Re: Meet Your New Citrix Technology Professional!

Yup, that captcha I can't even read.. Congrats Webster!! On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 1:06 PM, Michael B. Smith wrote: > Carl Webster, a regular poster here, was confirmed today as a member of a > very elite group: a Citrix Technology Professional. > > Carl is extremely active answering question

Re: Meet Your New Citrix Technology Professional!

Got it on the second try. On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 2:14 PM, tony patton < tony.pat...@quinn-insurance.com> wrote: > Done, but that captcha(?) on the citrix forum is a c*nt. > > Congrats, Carl :) > > Regards > > Tony Patton > Desktop Operations Cavan > Ext 8078 > Direct Dial 049 435 2878 > email: t

RE: WINS (- was RE: Domain controllers, what is supposed to happen.)

Are you sure ? We are running Exchange 2003 without WINS and no issues. CFee From: Sean Martin [mailto:seanmarti...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2010 12:44 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: WINS (- was RE: Domain controllers, what is supposed to happen.) Exchange 2003 and earli

RE: Spontaneous server reboots

Thanks for the info, Bob. You have been very helpful (as have all the other suggestions from the other posters). I can't swap the power supply until tomorrow evening (different office, 65 miles away). I'm going to try that before ordering the motherboard. Thank you, Kyle B. Plummer From

Re: Meet Your New Citrix Technology Professional!

Done, but that captcha(?) on the citrix forum is a c*nt. Congrats, Carl :) Regards Tony Patton Desktop Operations Cavan Ext 8078 Direct Dial 049 435 2878 email: tony.pat...@quinn-insurance.com From: "Michael B. Smith" To: "NT System Admin Issues" Date: 21/04/2010 19:07 Subject: Meet Your Ne

RE: square hole cage nuts?

I like these better http://www.cdw.com/shop/products/default.aspx?edc=1360250&cm_mmc=ShoppingFeeds-_-GoogleBase-_-NetComm%20Products-_-1360250_Middle%20Atlantic%20CN1032-50%20-%20rack%20nuts_MDA-CN1032-50 John W. Cook Systems Administrator Partnership For Strong Families 315 SE 2nd Ave Gainesville

RE: square hole cage nuts?

http://www.fastenersuperstore.com/nuts/Rack-Mounting-Nuts?gclid=CLLNopGwmKECFQwWswodhWrvNg http://shop.swiksys.com/racks-and-rails/m6-6mm-x-1-0-cage-nuts-washers-and-16mm-5-8-long-rack-screws.html http://www.google.com/products/catalog?hl=en&q=apc+rack+cage+nuts&um=1&ie=UTF-8&cid=1154343304775227

square hole cage nuts?

Anyone know of a decent place I can get cheap cage-nuts/screws for a square-holed server rack? I need about 60-100 of them. Thanks! mail2web.com – What can On Demand Business Solutions do for you? http://link.mail2web.com/Bu

RE: iPhone Issues in the NorthEast

I've been seeing a lot of this in Chicago as well as San Francisco. Thanks, Brian Desmond br...@briandesmond.com c - 312.731.3132 From: Don Guyer [mailto:don.gu...@prufoxroach.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2010 9:17 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: OT: iPhone Issues in the NorthEast A

RE: Web filtering solutions

I highly recommend the St Bernard iPrism appliance. Setup doesn't get much easier than this thing. From: James Rankin [mailto:kz2...@googlemail.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2010 12:19 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Web filtering solutions We are lo

Re: Web filtering solutions

+1 On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 12:42 PM, wrote: > II implemented a Barracuda solution to address SPAM and other "undesired" > information - would recommend this 100% > > -- > *From:* N Parr [mailto:npar...@mortonind.com] > *Sent:* Wednesday, April 21, 2010 1:34 PM > > *

RE: Web filtering solutions

II implemented a Barracuda solution to address SPAM and other "undesired" information - would recommend this 100% _ From: N Parr [mailto:npar...@mortonind.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2010 1:34 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Web filtering solutions We've been using Barra

RE: McAfee DAT problems

: D Erik Goldoff IT Consultant Systems, Networks, & Security ' Security is an ongoing process, not a one time event ! ' From: Don Guyer [mailto:don.gu...@prufoxroach.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2010 1:24 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: McAfee DAT problems Thanks to al

RE: McAfee DAT problems

Actually, the file is at the bottom of this article (it's 6k): https://kc.mcafee.com/corporate/index?page=content&id=KB68780 Don Guyer Systems Engineer - Information Services Prudential, Fox & Roach/Trident Group 431 W. Lancaster Avenue Devon, PA 19333 Direct: (610) 993-3299 Fax: (610

RE: Web filtering solutions

We've been using Barracuda for 4-5 years now and it works great. Integrate it with AD, setup group access and forget. From: James Rankin [mailto:kz2...@googlemail.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2010 11:19 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Web filtering solu

RE: McAfee DAT problems

At the end of the article previously posted: http://community.mcafee.com/thread/24056?tstart=0 It's really slow for me, guess everyone and their Grandma is downloading it. J Don Guyer Systems Engineer - Information Services Prudential, Fox & Roach/Trident Group 431 W. Lancaster A

RE: McAfee DAT problems

Thanks to all for bringing this to light. Because of this list, we avoided a possible disaster. Kudos! Don Guyer Systems Engineer - Information Services Prudential, Fox & Roach/Trident Group 431 W. Lancaster Avenue Devon, PA 19333 Direct: (610) 993-3299 Fax: (610) 650-5306 don.gu...@

RE: McAfee DAT problems

Got the link to the extra.dat? What version is your Mcafee saying. 5958 or 5960? Z Edward Ziots CISSP,MCSA,MCP+I,Security +,Network +,CCA Network Engineer Lifespan Organization 401-639-3505 ezi...@lifespan.org From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:pmaglin...@scvl.com] Sent: Wednesday

RE: McAfee DAT problems

So...does anyone know what TIME McAfee releases patches? We update daily at 1am and did NOT get this DAT that was released today... From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:pmaglin...@scvl.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2010 10:09 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: McAfee DAT problems McAfee has a

RE: Spontaneous server reboots

No, it was the only one on the 1500. 1 Dell 6400 + ext DAT drive was the full load on it. From: Kyle Plummer [mailto:kplum...@nje.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2010 9:38 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Spontaneous server reboots Did you have other servers hooked up to the same

RE: McAfee DAT problems

McAfee has an EXTRA.DAT file out now that will fix it. This is the process: To apply the extra.DAT locally: 1. Click Start, Run, type services.msc and click OK. 2. Right-click the McAfee McShield service and select Stop. 3. Copy the extra.DAT file to the following location:

Re: McAfee DAT problems

We're experiencing the issue on some of our XP machines. Suggestions from McAfee's Forum for PCs continually rebooting (haven't tested this yet). run shutdown -a from command line access the VirusScan Console, select Tools, Rollback DATs http://community.mcafee.com/thread/24056?tstart=0 On Wed

RE: McAfee DAT problems

Confirmed, this is causing widespread issues, XP and Windows 2000, We are disabling all Mcafee Services, by setting the registry keys start type to 0x4, and uninstalling Mcafee, and removing the the dat from the repository. Z Edward Ziots CISSP,MCSA,MCP+I,Security +,Network +,CCA Ne

RE: McAfee DAT problems

Yes, We have verified that McAFEE dat 5958 is bad, do not deploy this DAT to your systems( Windows 2000/XP). Z Edward Ziots CISSP,MCSA,MCP+I,Security +,Network +,CCA Network Engineer Lifespan Organization 401-639-3505 ezi...@lifespan.org From: Erik Goldoff [mailto:egold...@gm

RE: Web filtering solutions

My previous company, I set up an IPrism appliance and it worked very well. Support is great, and it's fairly easy to configure and administer. Jay Dale I.T. Manager, 3GiG Mobile: 713.299.2541 Email: jay.d...@3-gig.com Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail, including

FTP/Outlook Integration

Looking for a solution that will easily integrate Outlook email with our own FTP/SSH file storage. Found this: http://encryptomatic.com/outdisk/ Exactly what I need, however their software was REALLY buggy, and their support staff doesn't get back to me.

RE: VIPRE Enterprise Console 4.0.4283 Firewall Issues

Dennis, support has been trying to reach you. This is easily resolved. Feel free to email me directly as well. Alex From: Dennis Krebs [mailto:dennis.kr...@advancedav.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2010 10:57 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: VIPRE Enterprise Console 4.0.4283 Firewall Iss

RE: New Forefront question

Forefront and ConfigMgr integration announced today at MMS 2010. From: Justin Thomas [mailto:jat...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2010 12:42 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: New Forefront question yes and yes. It's been a couple of years now, but we used SCCM to push out

Re: WINS (- was RE: Domain controllers, what is supposed to happen.)

Exchange 2003 and earlier versions depend on NetBIOS. WINs is recommended to provide such. Other applications may also have similar dependencies. - Sean On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 6:43 AM, Ben Scott wrote: > On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 10:29 AM, Sherry Abercrombie > wrote: > > Turn it off and then se

Re: Web filtering solutions

Microsoft Threat Management Gateway is the new name for ISA... could look at that. >>> James Rankin 4/21/2010 9:19 AM >>> We are looking to cut costs at the minute and the issue of our web filtering solution has come up. Currently we use WebSense Enterprise in a mixed Citrix / Xen / VMWare View

RE: Domain controllers, what is supposed to happen.

I didn't know it had been replaced. Cool. Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: Carl Houseman [mailto:c.house...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2010 12:38 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Domain controllers, what is supposed

Re: New Forefront question

yes and yes. It's been a couple of years now, but we used SCCM to push out NoNav, and Forefront installed through WSUS and GP. We couldn't get real tight integration of the whole thing, so some folks were running both for a period of time. With all of that I suspect we visited at least 10% of the m

RE: McAfee DAT problems

Ouch … Erik Goldoff IT Consultant Systems, Networks, & Security ' Security is an ongoing process, not a one time event ! ' From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:pmaglin...@scvl.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2010 12:33 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: McAfee DAT problems This is

RE: Domain controllers, what is supposed to happen.

When XP is using the secondary DNS and I want it to use the primary which is now available, I just disable/re-enable the NIC. I believe this holds true for Vista/7 as well. If the primary was working and then becomes unavailable, I find that it will keep trying it, timeout (30 seconds), then us

  1   2   >