Couldn’t get it to run on Windows and our certificate for the domain is on the
Apache server anyway. So I thought I would just add an alias for TSWeb in the
Apache configuration and give it a go.
From: Tom Miller [mailto:tmil...@hnncsb.org]
Sent: Saturday 24 July 2010 22:26
To: NT System
You couldn’t get it to run on Windows? You were asked whether you had a
certificate installed on the Windows server (and have configured IIS to use
that certificate). You never got around to answering that question…
As Tom has mentioned, you are in a non-supported configuration. Why not try to
Obviously not a high priority with them, unfortunately. Not until we have
more competition, perhaps
-ASB: http://XeeSM.com/AndrewBaker
Sent from my Motorola Droid
On Jul 25, 2010 10:09 PM, Steven M. Caesare scaes...@caesare.com wrote:
It’s still broken. They need to fix it.
-sc
From:
It will reset the AD Restore Mode password. You can then boot the machine into
AD restore mode. Then create a task/service that runs as LocalSystem that can
reset one of the Domain Administrator passwords.
Cheers
Ken
-Original Message-
From: David Elebute
As long as you properly attribute them, there's no problem :)
-ASB: http://XeeSM.com/AndrewBaker
Sent from my Motorola Droid
On Jul 21, 2010 1:39 PM, Free, Bob r...@pge.com wrote:
Indeed, that is why some folks referred to lophtcrack as password auditing
software vs a password cracking
Anyone having issue with Vipre false positives on their Windows 2008 servers?
Last weekend, Friday night's scan reported a virus on each of my 2008 servers.
The Sunbelt team investigated and it was a false positive. Same thing this
weekend, and again a false positive. I have a third I'm
You are not alone...
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 8:40 AM, Tom Miller tmil...@hnncsb.org wrote:
Anyone having issue with Vipre false positives on their Windows 2008
servers? Last weekend, Friday night's scan reported a virus on each of my
2008 servers. The Sunbelt team investigated and it was a
Same here
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 7:43 AM, Richard Stovall rich...@gmail.com wrote:
You are not alone...
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 8:40 AM, Tom Miller tmil...@hnncsb.org wrote:
Anyone having issue with Vipre false positives on their Windows 2008
servers? Last weekend, Friday night's scan
These should have been addressed in def version 6636. If not please let us know
right away.
Thanks,
Jeff Cain - supp...@sunbeltsoftware.commailto:supp...@sunbeltsoftware.com
Technical Support Analyst
Sunbelt Software, part of the GFI Software family
Working on the second on this weekend now Jeff. Here are sample
details:
Machine: RVSDWIN (10.40.1.9)
User:
Scan Date:7/26/2010 6:28 AM
Software Version: 4.0.3275
ThreatDB Version: 6640
Policy: Servers
I need to tuck this one away for the next... what is it called?
Va-ca-tion? Right along with Clubber Lang's instructions for removing
yourself from the Exchange list. Priceless...
From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:scaes...@caesare.com]
Sent: Saturday, July 24, 2010 8:40 AM
To: NT System Admin
Open letter to Adobe, condensed version:
Dear Adobe:
Foxit Reader
From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:scaes...@caesare.com]
Sent: Sunday, July 25, 2010 12:25 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Open letter to Adobe
Dear Adobe-
You suck.
Allow me to expand: Your
Indeed. :)
-ASB: http://XeeSM.com/AndrewBaker
On Sat, Jul 24, 2010 at 9:40 AM, Steven M. Caesare scaes...@caesare.comwrote:
Best. OoO. Reply. Ever.
-sc
*From:* Brumbaugh, Luke [mailto:luke.brumba...@butlerschein.com]
*Sent:* Friday, July 23, 2010 3:53 PM
*To:* NT System Admin
I got notifications for .lnk files that are harmless. L I'm not particularly
worried about it, but I think Vipre is a little *too* cautious on .lnk
files.
John-AldrichTile-Tools
From: Eric Wittersheim [mailto:eric.wittersh...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, July 26, 2010 9:01 AM
To: NT System
Everyone,
AV Lab is aware of the FPs and they should be resolved late this
morning.
Thanks,
Jeff Cain – supp...@sunbeltsoftware.commailto:supp...@sunbeltsoftware.com
Technical Support Analyst
Sunbelt Software, part of the GFI Software family
Smart cards are optional for DirectAccess, not required. What I was trying
(poorly) to say was that Microsoft's internal implementation of DirectAccess is
set up to require smart card authentication (e.g. MSFT employees must use smart
cards). Our DirectAccess implementation currently does not
Fwiw, there is a very serious zero day .lnk exploit going around.
http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9179339/Windows_shortcut_attack_code_goes_public
Apparently our heuristics were a little too aggressive...
Alex
From: John Aldrich
I've lost thos directions, could you repost for my edification? :-)
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 9:29 AM, Maglinger, Paul pmaglin...@scvl.comwrote:
I need to tuck this one away for the next… what is it called?
Va-ca-tion? Right along with Clubber Lang’s instructions for removing
yourself from
Oh man, that was awesome.
If you have saved away... either please re-post, or send me a copy!
-sc
From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:pmaglin...@scvl.com]
Sent: Monday, July 26, 2010 9:29 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Anyone using Forefront UAG and Direct Access
I need to
Back by popular request:
You need to unsubscribe. Here's how:
First, ask your Internet Provider to mail you an Unsubscribing Kit.
Then follow these directions.
The kit will most likely be the standard no-fault type. Depending on
requirements, System A and/or System B can be used. When operating
QIK
Stream live from your phone, view live from their web site. Save and
publish to wherever later. Free
From: Erik Goldoff [mailto:egold...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, July 24, 2010 4:33 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: OT : Streaming Video Site for
For those who want a decent, small and fast alternative to Reader, may I
suggest Evince.
http://projects.gnome.org/evince/
There is a windows version, and it has been an excellent little PDF reader, and
a good alternative for the old Foxit Reader alternative that has gone to bloat.
Only
On 26 Jul 2010 at 10:09, John Aldrich wrote:
I got notifications for .lnk files that are harmless. L I´m not
particularly worried about it, but I think Vipre is a little *too* cautious
on .lnk files.
Agree.
I'll bet none of these is a real exploit.
= Included Stuff Follows
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/sysinternals/bb842062.aspx
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/sysinternals/bb842062.aspxAnd it looks
very good. Now captures sent/received stats.
-ASB: http://XeeSM.com/AndrewBaker
Exploiting Technology for Business Advantage...
~ Finally, powerful endpoint
Foxit is still a pretty good alternative for me...
-ASB: http://XeeSM.com/AndrewBaker
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 11:29 AM, Matthew W. Ross
mr...@ephrataschools.orgwrote:
For those who want a decent, small and fast alternative to Reader, may I
suggest Evince.
http://projects.gnome.org/evince/
This does make some sense. The issue with VOIP might well be a problem
at some point - we have a Shoretel system, and it's desired at some
point to have remote folks use a soft phone remotely. I don't know if
it uses IPv4 only, or if it can use v6, or even if it uses SIP for its
native
Thanks, but from my phone is not the primary choice, I’d like to use a
wireless IP camera, that can be mounted in a location to provide best
angle/shot.
Erik Goldoff
IT Consultant
Systems, Networks, Security
' Security is an ongoing process, not a one time event ! '
From: N Parr
How does ustream.tv recognize the difference between a wireless and wired IP
camera? As far as the application is concerned, it's just an IP address.
Carl
From: Erik Goldoff [mailto:egold...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, July 26, 2010 12:31 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OT :
Ustream *doesn’t* recognize any IP camera, it recognizes a direct attached
USB camera only ( I haven’t tried firewire, but same limitation on camera
location I’d suppose )
Erik Goldoff
IT Consultant
Systems, Networks, Security
' Security is an ongoing process, not a one time event ! '
Fail
Const HOSTING_OU = OU=Users,OU=Main,dc=myinternaldomain,dc=org
I've tried variations too, like just OU=Users, OU=Main
Looks like it's failing on this line:
Set objRoot = GetObject (LDAP://RootDSE)
strDomainDN = objRoot.Get (defaultNamingContext)
Going back to just main (not OU=Main,
On 26 Jul 2010 at 12:15, Andrew S. Baker wrote:
Foxit is still a pretty good alternative for me...
And here's my Foxit-NoAds.reg:
= Included Stuff Follows =
Windows Registry Editor Version 5.00
[HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Foxit Software\Foxit Reader\MainFrame]
OK, so you want to emulate a webcam with an IP camera. Google for use IP
camera with x substituting Skype or Messenger or some other frequently
webcam'd application.
Carl
From: Erik Goldoff [mailto:egold...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, July 26, 2010 12:55 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
http://isc.sans.edu/diary.html?storyid=9268
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
We've brought up a 2008R2 domain in our lab, to simulate our production
environment. The first user account created was my boss creating his account,
setting it as a God account, with memberships in all the high level admin
groups (Domain Admins, Enterprise Admins, etc.)
When he uses this
HOSTING_OU is used here:
Set objContainer = GetObject (LDAP://OU= HOSTING_OU , strDomainDN)
So it shortcuts the OU for the most specific OU. If your primary OU is Main and
the sub-OU is SubOU, then set
Const HOSTING_OU = SubOU,OU=Main
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
Now that is a nice improvement! Thanks for the heads up.
From: Andrew S. Baker [mailto:asbz...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, July 26, 2010 9:12 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Cc: ADMIN_MISC; COMPUTING
Subject: TCPVIEW has been updated
Indeed... thanks Kurt!
-Original Message-
From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, July 26, 2010 1:22 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: This might prove useful
http://isc.sans.edu/diary.html?storyid=9268
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource
Agreed! The videos are informative as well.
--
richard
Steven M. Caesare scaes...@caesare.com wrote on 07/26/2010 02:26:17
PM:
Indeed... thanks Kurt!
-Original Message-
From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, July 26, 2010 1:22 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
I'm decommissioning some servers, and to ease the transition, since we have
some old code that is hardcoded with old server names, I'm going through the
motions of setting up CNAME DNS records to point any queries to the old server
to the new server, set up the key in
I take it that it would be too difficult to have your developers go back and do
away with the hardcoded names?
Phillip Partipilo p...@psnet.com 7/26/2010 12:31 PM
I'm decommissioning some servers, and to ease the transition, since we have
some old code that is hardcoded with old server names,
Thanks !
Erik Goldoff
IT Consultant
Systems, Networks, Security
' Security is an ongoing process, not a one time event ! '
-Original Message-
From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, July 26, 2010 1:22 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: This might prove
I've got a huge (50+ page) word document that I created by exporting from a
PDF and now it's too big (17+ megs) for one of my users who I exported it
for. It keeps locking up his computer, apparently due to the file size.
Anyone know how to make multiple smaller documents from a single Word
Other than opening the original and saving portions of it to new docs,
sorry, nope.
From: John Aldrich [mailto:jaldr...@blueridgecarpet.com]
Sent: Monday, July 26, 2010 2:47 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Split Word document by page number
I've got a huge (50+ page) word document
What Version of Office do they have? I have found this problem is less in
2007/2010. Just save it as a Docx and some of the time is solves the problem.
From: Kim Longenbaugh [mailto:k...@colonialsavings.com]
Sent: Monday, July 26, 2010 2:50 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Split Word
Unfortunately, the user has Office 2000, ( I think.it's not 2007, and I
don't think it's XP/2003.)
John-AldrichTile-Tools
From: Terry Dickson [mailto:te...@treasurer.state.ks.us]
Sent: Monday, July 26, 2010 3:53 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Split Word document by page number
What did you use to create the PDF? Does this doc have any pictures or
images?
What is the user using to read the PDF?
-ASB: http://XeeSM.com/AndrewBaker
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 3:55 PM, John Aldrich
jaldr...@blueridgecarpet.comwrote:
Unfortunately, the user has Office 2000, ( I think…it’s
We're trying to become NSF1000 certified. Part of that involves filling out
a bunch of paperwork. This is one of those files that needs to be filled out
and it's more of a template that we need to modify to fit our organization
than just a straight form. He was trying to use Adobe Acrobat (I think
What OS? I had to do this about a year ago on a 2003 Server and I did not
have to use the setspn tool that I recall. I did have to create a string
value at HKLM\System\CurrentControlSet\Services\lanmanserver\parameters
called OptionalNames, and put the secondary names there (each on its own
Perhaps I should note that I was only moving file shares and no Kerberized
services.
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 4:08 PM, Richard Stovall rich...@gmail.com wrote:
What OS? I had to do this about a year ago on a 2003 Server and I did not
have to use the setspn tool that I recall. I did have to
Ok. I went to an online service to convert the PDF to a word document.
Zamzar was no help. They converted it to an image file. J I found another
place, pdftoword.com that did a good job of converting the file and it
appears to work on the user's PC. I logged into their PC from remote and
You can try this I know it works in 2007 and 2003. Back up the word document
first. Open in your Word 2007, then go to open new and choose new from
existing document. It should open another copy but much smaller in size. Save
as doc and then have your user try and open that one.
Robert
From:
Your machine wouldn't happen to be a domain controller, would it?
See the last 4 comments to a very interesting article.
http://blogs.technet.com/b/askds/archive/2008/05/29/kerberos-authentication-problems-service-principal-name-spn-issues-part-1.aspx
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 3:31 PM, Phillip
Richard,
That is exactly what we had to do for a migration to make Kerberos work and
stay working for 3 months while the vendor upgraded some software code. Worked
great.
Its primary use is for renaming domain controllers, during the process netdom
will copy the old name of the server into
Since you could open it without problems, did you try saving it as a 2007
doc, and them saving it back as a 2003 file? I'll bet that would have been
easier...
-ASB: http://XeeSM.com/AndrewBaker
Sent from my Motorola Droid
On Jul 26, 2010 4:26 PM, John Aldrich jaldr...@blueridgecarpet.com
That's another old school trick brought you by Office 4.x and the myriad of
slightly compatible competing apps back in the day.
-ASB: http://XeeSM.com/AndrewBaker
Sent from my Motorola Droid
On Jul 26, 2010 4:28 PM, Robert LeBlanc robert.lebl...@aanmpc.com wrote:
You can try this I know it
55 matches
Mail list logo
