On 30 Sep 2010 at 15:25, Carl Houseman wrote:
Well... I want to install the solution on an SBS 2003 server.I wonder
how Mercury and Exchange would get along? (!) Yeah, I think NOT having a
built-in mail server is a plus for this situation.
You didn't mention that in the original mail.
Wowthis thread went off on one.
Not to try and resurrect it or anythingbut I recall that you mentioned
some strange permissions on DCs that could be inherited by the Server
Operators group. Do you have any further details on these - purely out of
interest. I know a few admins who've used
There's no such thing with PCI/PCIe anymore.
Each device driver needs to register interrupt handling code, and these are
chained together.
Cheers
Ken
-Original Message-
From: Sam Cayze [mailto:sam.ca...@rollouts.com]
Sent: Friday, 1 October 2010 3:21 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-11430069
Probably well overdue, in hindsight
--
On two occasions...I have been asked, 'Pray, Mr Babbage, if you put into
the machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?' I am not able
rightly to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could
good choice
Now if you'll excuse me there is a Guinness with my name on it calling me.
WJR
- from my Crackberry.
If you find yourself in a fair fight, your tactics suck.
--
From: Webster
Yeah... Black-listing is a good reason to let someone else do your
mass-mailing for you. Also, would be a good idea to get confirmation from
those that you are going to be sending regular mailings to that they are
willing to accept those regular mailings, otherwise, you'll start getting
spam
It will be interesting to see if this version manages to do what EFI
didn't...
-sc
From: James Rankin [mailto:kz2...@googlemail.com]
Sent: Friday, October 01, 2010 7:00 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: The end of the BIOS is nigh...
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-11430069
It’s all about standards … either it has to emulate BIOS to interface with
existing Operating Systems, or the OS developers have to code future
versions to it and drop any backwards hardware capability. ( or bloat the
os more with dual capability ??? )
Chicken or the Egg ?
Erik Goldoff
On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 6:59 AM, James Rankin kz2...@googlemail.com wrote:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-11430069
We've heard that before. Maybe this time it will come true.
Modern BIOSes usually don't take more than a few seconds to boot, so
that seems like a non-issue. The single
On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 8:58 AM, Erik Goldoff egold...@gmail.com wrote:
It’s all about standards … either it has to emulate BIOS to interface with
existing Operating Systems, or the OS developers have to code future
versions to it and drop any backwards hardware capability. ( or bloat the
os
I am jumping in here late but..
If you cannot restore your data in less than a week, you might as well close.
The current thinking in D/R is that 90% of businesses fail if data cannot be
recovered within 7 days.
The first good thing you came up with is that you need help. Keep in mind most
No more BIOS? That means no more chuckles over Bad or missing keyboard -
press F1 to continue :-(
James Rankin kz2...@googlemail.com wrote on 10/01/2010 05:59:49 AM:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-11430069
Probably well overdue, in hindsight
--
On two occasions...I have been
Love how they capitalize UEFI but not BIOS. Quality.
- Original Message -
From: James Rankin
To: NT System Admin Issues
Sent: Friday, October 01, 2010 6:59 AM
Subject: The end of the BIOS is nigh...
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-11430069
Probably well overdue, in
Perhaps it is BIAS?
James Kerr cluster...@gmail.com wrote on 10/01/2010 08:21:15 AM:
Love how they capitalize UEFI but not BIOS. Quality.
- Original Message -
From: James Rankin
To: NT System Admin Issues
Sent: Friday, October 01, 2010 6:59 AM
Subject: The end of the BIOS is
On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 9:18 AM, richardmccl...@aspca.org wrote:
No more BIOS? That means no more chuckles over Bad or missing keyboard -
press F1 to continue :-(
Oh, I'm sure IBM's implementation of $NEW_THING will retain their
error messages. They've held on for 30 years, why would
I found the picture of the floppy disk quite hilarious.
Shook
From: James Kerr [mailto:cluster...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, October 01, 2010 9:21 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: The end of the BIOS is nigh...
Love how they capitalize UEFI but not BIOS. Quality.
- Original Message
It's all about names and marketing. The underlying and overall function of
the firmware must still be the same. But this is NEW! and You Need It to
be on the cutting edge. It wouldn't have the same promotional value had it
been called BIOS 2.0 or NGBIOS.
For sure, compatibility is a
Had this really been about sales/marketing, of course I would recommend a
3rd party delivery.
But it's not. In case you missed it, it's about sending weekly status to
customers who ask for it. They currently do this with Outlook and a DL.
I'm pushing Groupman to get past the DL-membership limit
I liked the following:
Mr Doran said the creators of the original Bios only expected it to have a
lifetime of about 250,000 machines - a figure that has long been surpassed.
They are as amazed as anyone else that now it is still alive and well in a
lot of systems, he said. It was never really
Ahh...yeah, I missed that part. Still, having automated unsubscribe is a
good idea. :-) Good luck!
-Original Message-
From: Carl Houseman [mailto:c.house...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, October 01, 2010 10:52 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Free/cheap mailing list software -
Windows 2003 SP1
I have a share on my file server called Share1
Under Share1 I have multiple subfolders.
Permissions are not inherited to the subfolders.
How do I prevents users from seeing the subfolders they do nto have
any permissions too..
Currently they get an error saying Access denied
On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 11:01 AM, Andrew S. Baker asbz...@gmail.com wrote:
I liked the following:
Mr Doran said the creators of the original Bios only expected it to have a
lifetime of about 250,000 machines - a figure that has long been surpassed.
They are as amazed as anyone else that now
Like the Y2K issue?
From: Andrew S. Baker [mailto:asbz...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, October 01, 2010 10:01 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: The end of the BIOS is nigh...
I liked the following:
Mr Doran said the creators of the original Bios only expected it
to have a
This should get you going in the right direction...
http://blogs.technet.com/b/filecab/archive/2008/10/09/storage-tips-access-based-enumeration-hidden-secrets-no-pun-intended.aspx
On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 11:33 AM, Phil FromWork philfromw...@gmail.comwrote:
Windows 2003 SP1
I have a share on
Something like that...
*ASB*
* *
On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 11:34 AM, Maglinger, Paul pmaglin...@scvl.comwrote:
Like the Y2K issue?
*From:* Andrew S. Baker [mailto:asbz...@gmail.com]
*Sent:* Friday, October 01, 2010 10:01 AM
*To:* NT System Admin Issues
*Subject:* Re: The end of the
On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 11:34 AM, Maglinger, Paul pmaglin...@scvl.com wrote:
Like the Y2K issue?
It's interesting to note that Y2K bugs keep happening, even in
entirely new code. It's amazing how many programmers just don't
expect users to enter a two-digit year, or assume tm.tm_year is the
The feature you need to work your Google-FU on is called Access Based
Enumeration -
http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserver2003/techinfo/overview/abe.mspx
Paul G.
-Original Message-
From: Phil FromWork [mailto:philfromw...@gmail.com]
Sent: 01 October 2010 16:33
To: NT System Admin
Everybody programming now will be dead in 3000... why should they
bother?
-sc
-Original Message-
From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, October 01, 2010 11:52 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: The end of the BIOS is nigh...
On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at
But how will we pronounce the new acronym?... we're all used to saying
Bye-ohs, what about UEFI??? - perhaps You-fee or how about you-ay-fee
or even you-ee-fee
These things matter!!!
J
Paul G.
From: James Rankin [mailto:kz2...@googlemail.com]
Sent: 01 October 2010 12:00
To: NT
Probably the same thing we call our equipment.
You effing mo... Oh, sorry.
On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 12:30 PM, Paul Gordon paul_gor...@hotmail.comwrote:
But how will we pronounce the new acronym?... we’re all used to saying
“Bye-ohs”, what about UEFI??? – perhaps “You-fee” or how about
Reminds me of a university choral organization to which I belong...
A breathing exercise/warm-up has us going F... S... SH...
repeaditly. All I can think when doing this is, Hey, that's been my
whole afternoon!
Jonathan Link jonathan.l...@gmail.com wrote on 10/01/2010 11:32:43 AM:
Awesome.
Down in the south it's Hey, Bubba. Git to peckin' on that thar F1 key so you
can dun git into th' configurin' screen 'n such
Shook
From: Don Guyer [mailto:don.gu...@prufoxroach.com]
Sent: Friday, October 01, 2010 1:15 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: The end of the BIOS is
However, the universal reply is always Byte me
From: Andy Shook [mailto:andy.sh...@peak10.com]
Sent: Friday, October 01, 2010 12:29 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: The end of the BIOS is nigh...
Awesome.
Down in the south it's Hey, Bubba. Git to peckin' on that thar F1 key
On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 12:10 PM, Steven M. Caesare scaes...@caesare.com wrote:
It's interesting to note that Y2K bugs keep happening, even in
entirely new code. It's amazing how many programmers just don't
expect users to enter a two-digit year, or assume tm.tm_year is the
current year not
You think people will be reading the archives of this list in the around
year 3000?
- Original Message -
From: Ben Scott mailvor...@gmail.com
To: NT System Admin Issues ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Sent: Friday, October 01, 2010 2:01 PM
Subject: Re: The end of the BIOS is
What about the 2038 problem?
On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 2:01 PM, Ben Scott mailvor...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 12:10 PM, Steven M. Caesare scaes...@caesare.com
wrote:
It's interesting to note that Y2K bugs keep happening, even in
entirely new code. It's amazing how many
On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 2:12 PM, Jonathan Link jonathan.l...@gmail.com wrote:
What about the 2038 problem?
That's a somewhat different beast.
Y2K is mainly a human factors problem, as it's humans who like
two-digit years, not computers. (Contrary to popular belief, data
storage capacity was
That's OK, it's all over by 2012.
Don Guyer
Systems Engineer - Information Services
Prudential, Fox Roach/Trident Group
431 W. Lancaster Avenue
Devon, PA 19333
Direct: (610) 993-3299
Fax: (610) 650-5306
don.gu...@prufoxroach.com mailto:don.gu...@prufoxroach.com
From: Jonathan Link
Don't forget 12/21/2012...
From: Jonathan Link [mailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, October 01, 2010 1:13 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: The end of the BIOS is nigh...
What about the 2038 problem?
On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 2:01 PM, Ben Scott mailvor...@gmail.com wrote:
Since no one else has ventured an opinion I will, hesitantly, offer mine.
My thoughts are that you may have had an issue similar to what is discussed
here when a DC is restored from backups, and had a USN rollback.
http://blogs.dirteam.com/blogs/jorge/archive/2006/03/08/597.aspx
Again, only my
I have a client who has been tasked with outbound mail scanning for content.
I was looking at GFI Mail Security, im pretty sure their older version used
to have something where you could stop outbound mail if it had keywords and
that mail would get forwarded to their 'manager' who could then
Transport rules
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa997187(EXCHG.80).aspx
John W. Cook
System Administrator
Partnership For Strong Families
315 SE 2nd Ave
Gainesville, Fl 32601
Cell (352) 215-6944
MCSE, MCP+I, MCTS, CompTIA A+, N+, VSP4, VTSP4
From: Michael B. Smith
I'd have to agree with that.
- WJR
On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 14:39, Level Five - List li...@levelfive.us wrote:
Most reading I have done in the past is to not convert your DC’s on the
fly.. In every migration I have done, I would create a new DC vm, migrate
the roles to it from the physical
We use MessageLabs here
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Friday, October 01, 2010 3:43 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Outbound Email Checking
You can do pretty much any outbound scanning that you want with Exchange
I was more commenting in the laziness of people.
-sc
-Original Message-
From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, October 01, 2010 2:01 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: The end of the BIOS is nigh...
On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 12:10 PM, Steven M. Caesare
Indeed we hate web visitors, especially to our online store! :) Happy Friday!
-Marc
From: Webster [mailto:carlwebs...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2010 10:10 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: eeye eeye eeye oh! (www.eeye.com)
Don't you get it, Marc wants you to stay away
Hi all,
Looking at online backup solutions for a couple of very small
offices. New product field for me. I've been reading docs and specs
and stuff, and come to the conclusion that they all work for the
basics. So, anyone here used *more than one* and care to comment on
strengths of one vs
ProofPoint here. A lot happier with their latest version.
- Sean
On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 11:54 AM, David Mazzaccaro
david.mazzacc...@hudsonmobility.com wrote:
We use MessageLabs here
--
*From:* Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
*Sent:* Friday,
Are you running it your Proofpoint server(s) in a VM or on an appliance?
We're in the process of moving ours to a virtual environment and have had to
make some adaptations to the recommended VM configuration to address
performance issues.
-Malcolm
From: Sean Martin
We've got 4 appliances.
- Sean
On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 1:33 PM, Malcolm Reitz malcolm.re...@live.comwrote:
Are you running it your Proofpoint server(s) in a VM or on an appliance?
We’re in the process of moving ours to a virtual environment and have had to
make some adaptations to the
Ya. Too bad the camcorder wasn't able to catch more if it, but how
tragic...
-sc
-Original Message-
From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, October 01, 2010 5:04 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Tower Climbing
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 11:48 PM, Steven M.
I have used Mozy Pro/Business for a few years. Love it. EMC owns it.
Versioning, great reporting, email alerts, great management portal with
robust policy management, quotas, encryption, throttling, etc. They
even support VSS, SQL, and Exchange.
Their new software enables a local copy to be
I've used the Microsoft's Mesh for my wife's system. It works great and has
saved her from several issues.
I currently have a Windows Home Server that does the image based backups
every night. I am considering getting an online backup solution for just
that box. Local copies then if I lose that
This was my thought as well. I'd agree with others that it's not worth the risk
using these cloning apps with DCs. The work to do the dcpromo down/up is
trivial. If replication traffic is an issue cook off IFM media from the current
DC and them promote from media on the new box.
Thanks,
Brian
Offhand I don't remember, but, if you go in GPMC and open up the Default Domain
DC policies, you can browse down to computer\windows settings\security
settings\user rights assignment and do browse through there assuming you
haven't twiddled with the defaults.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
If the data isn't too large you can use MS Mesh, I share it with my team
here for all our clients docs/proposals/quotes, then I have one for my
qbooks data that syncs between home, office, laptop so I always have my
latest qbook data. Seems to work well.
A friend of mine uses Skydrive and one of
56 matches
Mail list logo
