RE: File copy performance - XP vs Win7

2012-03-07 Thread Ziots, Edward
+, Network + Security Engineer Lifespan Organization ezi...@lifespan.org From: Richard McClary [mailto:richard.mccl...@aspca.org] Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2012 4:05 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: File copy performance - XP vs Win7 It was once about 40 minutes; it's now 90

RE: File copy performance - XP vs Win7

2012-03-07 Thread Richard McClary
. From: Ziots, Edward [mailto:ezi...@lifespan.org] Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2012 7:36 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: File copy performance - XP vs Win7 Pretty easy to find out what is going on if you took a packet-sniff on the XP box and on the Windows 7 box to the endpoint

RE: File copy performance - XP vs Win7

2012-03-07 Thread Ziots, Edward
+ Security Engineer Lifespan Organization ezi...@lifespan.org From: Richard McClary [mailto:richard.mccl...@aspca.org] Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2012 9:16 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: File copy performance - XP vs Win7 Thanks! Problem is, the XP box went up in smoke about 2

RE: File copy performance - XP vs Win7

2012-03-07 Thread Randal, Phil
| Thorn Office Centre | Hereford HR2 6JT Tel: 01432 260415 | Email: phil.ran...@hoopleltd.co.uk From: Ziots, Edward [mailto:ezi...@lifespan.org] Sent: 07 March 2012 13:36 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: File copy performance - XP vs Win7 Pretty easy to find out what is going on if you took

RE: File copy performance - XP vs Win7

2012-03-07 Thread Ziots, Edward
Organization ezi...@lifespan.org From: Randal, Phil [mailto:phil.ran...@hoopleltd.co.uk] Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2012 10:40 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: File copy performance - XP vs Win7 Another possible issue could be this: The SACK option is always set to true even if network

Re: File copy performance - XP vs Win7

2012-03-06 Thread Ben Scott
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 2:08 PM, Richard McClary richard.mccl...@aspca.org wrote: Any ideas as to what might be slowing down the copy process? Insufficient data for a meaningful answer. Start with the nodes involved: AA = database server BB = backup processor CC = old backup storage target

RE: File copy performance - XP vs Win7

2012-03-06 Thread Richard McClary
PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: File copy performance - XP vs Win7 I haven't seen any mention of actual recorded time for the backups involved. How much time did it take before? How much is it taking now? ASB http://XeeMe.com/AndrewBaker Harnessing the Advantages of Technology

RE: File copy performance - XP vs Win7

2012-03-06 Thread Derek Harris
performance - XP vs Win7 Use an app like LAN Speed Testhttp://www.lmgtfy.com/?q=LAN+Speed+Test to manually verify transfer time/speeds. Based on other chatter I have come across, these are likely associated to known issues/settings in Windows 7 that can be disabled. Verify the transfer time