2013 1:50 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Non-corp desktops and RDS
Instead of RDP over VPN, have you looked at RD Gateway? It does require
terminal server licences for the users, but eliminates the kind of issues
you're describing by tunneling only RDP over SSL and nothing
Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, February 15, 2013 2:13 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Non-corp desktops and RDS
I definitely agree, but I was overruled on that...
Kurt
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 7:27 AM, Guyer, Don wrote:
> Best thing to do, if possible and backed
The EX series of Aventail (Was Sonicall, now Dell) is indeed very nice.
I like our a lot.
Kurt
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 7:21 AM, Candee wrote:
> We have just now started looking into this.
> We saw a demo of Aventail, and were quite impressed.
> We have a few more demos set up, but so far this o
I definitely agree, but I was overruled on that...
Kurt
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 7:27 AM, Guyer, Don wrote:
> Best thing to do, if possible and backed by everyone, is to give everyone
> laptops and write up a policy that non-corp owned devices are not supported.
>
> Regards,
>
> Don Guyer
> Cath
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 7:03 AM, Kennedy, Jim
wrote:
> How well is allowing non-corporate assets connect to a RDS session from home
> working for everyone. Using an SSL tunnel here. I am just starting initial
> testing with a few users and it is a nightmare. Wrong Java, toolbars and
> popup bl
n/patched/well maintained machine
> connects and functions perfectly.
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* Andrew S. Baker [mailto:asbz...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Friday, February 15, 2013 11:30 AM
>
> *To:* NT System Admin Issues
> *Subject:* Re: Non-corp desktops and
t: Re: Non-corp desktops and RDS
I would recommend that you take the results of the testing, look at vendors
that will help you with the security of such an approach, and then propose the
full approach (with a suitable timeframe) for approval.
If you're fortunate, they'll approve the p
sues
Subject: RE: Non-corp desktops and RDS
+1!
Once things like PCI compliance require 2-factor authentication, there are
things about company-issued hardware (MAC addresses, installed certificates,
etc) which work as one of the factors. Multiple passwords are NOT multi-factor
for PCI.
-Orig
ot;NT System Admin Issues"
Subject: Re: Non-corp desktops and RDS
Instead of RDP over VPN, have you looked at RD Gateway? It does require
terminal server licences for the users, but eliminates the kind of issues
you're describing by tunneling only RDP over SSL and nothing else.
On Fr
I will give that a try. I have RDS User licenses galore. We use them in labs.
From: Richard Stovall [mailto:rich...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, February 15, 2013 11:18 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Non-corp desktops and RDS
Instead of RDP over VPN, have you looked at RD Gateway? It
[mailto:dgu...@che.org]
Sent: Friday, February 15, 2013 9:28 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Non-corp desktops and RDS
Best thing to do, if possible and backed by everyone, is to give everyone
laptops and write up a policy that non-corp owned devices are not supported.
Regards,
Don
Instead of RDP over VPN, have you looked at RD Gateway? It does require
terminal server licences for the users, but eliminates the kind of issues
you're describing by tunneling only RDP over SSL and nothing else.
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 10:03 AM, Kennedy, Jim wrote:
> How well is allowing non-
Best thing to do, if possible and backed by everyone, is to give everyone
laptops and write up a policy that non-corp owned devices are not supported.
Regards,
Don Guyer
Catholic Health East - Information Technology
Enterprise Directory & Messaging Services
3805 West Chester Pike, Suite 100, New
We have just now started looking into this.
We saw a demo of Aventail, and were quite impressed.
We have a few more demos set up, but so far this one was the only
outstanding one.
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 10:03 AM, Kennedy, Jim wrote:
> How well is allowing non-corporate assets connect to a RDS s
Sounds like a good UAT period is needed to iron out the app inconsistencies.
Its all about the apps. Apps apps apps. If your user base doesn't have
well-defined application needs and they customize their own desktops, then
maybe VDI is more suited than published resources from RDS?
--Origin
15 matches
Mail list logo
